Wikipedia:Reference desk archive/Mathematics/2006 August 27

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
< August 26 Mathematics desk archive August 28 >
Humanities Science Mathematics Computing/IT Language Miscellaneous Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions at one of the pages linked to above.


Linear Differential Equation[edit]


I know how to solve linear differential equations, but the y3 on the right side has totally confused me. Here y=y(x).--Patchouli 08:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

See the section "Linear differential equations with variable coefficients" on Linear differential equation. That has the method for solving such a DE. Dysprosia 09:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
I had looked at that already. It doesn't help me eliminate y3.--Patchouli 09:07, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
That's not a linear differential equation because of the y3 term. Did you try separation of variables? We have an article about it (see separation of variables), but you're probably better of looking it up in a textbook or lecture notes. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:22, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Oh, whoops. Dysprosia 11:37, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


You should have directed me to Bernoulli differential equation.


.

Equation

Integrating factor is .

u=1+c×e2×x.

--Patchouli 09:38, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

While that method works here, so does separation of variables, which in this case is quite easy:
--LambiamTalk 10:31, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I wasn't thinking of partial fractions for integrating::.

Your solution is imaginative.--Patchouli 11:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Continuous functions[edit]

I was recently reading a (non-WP) article that uses the notation with and k an integer to denote some sort of continuity. The paper failed to describe the meaning of this notation. From the context, it was clear that it was kind-of-like viz. the set of k-times differentiable functions. For a while, I thought this might refer to Sobolev space, but the condition makes this seem unlikely. Any hints about what this notation might be? FWIW, this is a survey article, so the author was clearly assuming that this is a basic notation. FWIW, this is the article: Potential theory, the notation shows up just a little more than 1/3 of the way in. Its mostly just plain-old stock, ordinary integrals and derivatives on plain-old flat space, nothing fancy, nothing topological, or otherwise whiz-bang, nothing beyond multivariate calculus. linas 15:31, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Could it be functions with Holder continuous k-th derivative? See Holder condition (Igny 16:16, 27 August 2006 (UTC))
Why yes, of course, that's exactly it. Thanks. linas 03:05, 28 August 2006 (UTC)