See above for a prior discussion on this – the question is whether there should be this subsection in Controversies when there is already a full section on this event (2017 purge). Tarafa15 (talk) 15:46, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Should content about an EDM proposal to rename Holocaust Memorial Day be relevant enough to be included on this page? RevertBob (talk) 13:43, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
There is persistent speculation, frequently manifested in news and popular culture, that Prince Harry is the child of James Hewitt, with whom his mother had a relationship. Should his article include this facet of his public image? If so, in what form? Nstouski (talk) 18:49, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, this image is awful and very poorly reflects the image of the subject. in violation of MOS:IMAGELEAD and wp:blp please see the awful photo here, Doria_Ragland#/media/File:Doria_Ragland.png it was claimed in the previous discussion that the photo is better than nothing, is that the wikipedia policy way? Govindaharihari (talk) 19:52, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Requesting comment please so that the article can be edited if needed to be in a place that people agree the close connection disclaimer currently at the top can be removed. My impression is that User:JJMC89 wants it to be reviewed for neutrality. Thanks! Pianolover1979 (talk) 00:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
(1) Should this sentence remain in the Brett Kavanaugh article:
Between September 10 and 16, 2018, Kavanaugh had the highest opposition (42%) of any of the eleven Supreme Court nominees Gallup has polled about since Robert Bork in 1987.[1][2]
(2) Should this sentence remain in the Brett Kavanaugh article:
A YouGov/The Economist poll on September 23–25 found 55% of Republicans thought he should be confirmed even if the allegations of sexual assault were true, compared to 28% of the whole sample and 13% of Democrats.[3]
This edit introduced the phrase promotes political violence into the description of Proud Boys in first sentence of the lede, and into the infobox under 'type'.
This RFC does not contest the following lede text which was present in both versions:
The organization glorifies violence, and members participate in violence at events it attends
Two questions:
Should promotes political violence be included in the infobox
Should promotes political violence be included in the lede. If so, where.
Is it appropriate to include material regarding a company's political donations under a CEO's tenure on his BLP? This was previously discussed here, but no consensus was reached.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 01:58, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Background: The most recent infobox RfC on this talk page concluded with 70% support for some kind of infobox, but with 17% in favour of only a default-collapsed infobox, it was ultimately closed as no consensus. The closer suggested a future RfC on the inclusion of a collapsible infobox as a possible next step. This option has recently been brought up again by Willydrach in the section above where it was decided that an RfC was the next step. Let's try and have a civil RfC on this so we can establish the consensus on whether a collapsible infobox can serve as a compromise.
Question: Should a collapsible infobox be added to this page?
Should the opening sentence of this biography describe Louis Farrakhan, in Wikipedia's voice, as an antisemite (in addition to being an American religious leader, black nationalist, activist, and social commentator), or is that an opinion best attributed to its sources elsewhere in the lead section? — Malik ShabazzTalk/Stalk 02:33, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Should Leo Tolstoy's pronunciation of his own name ("Lyov" per Lectures on Russian Literature by Vladimir Nabokov) be included in the article in the lead or as a footnote? It's a very uncommon transliteration of the Russian name Lev, especially in connection to Tolstoy who has been widely known by the names Lev and Leo in Russia and worldwide, with few sources referring to him as "Lyov" as I showed on the talk page. The user who brought it up insists it should go in the lead even before the Lev name, while I agree to leave it as a footnote like in the Russian version of the article, without additional changes to his birth/native name and further clarifications. AveTory (talk) 18:46, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.