Wikipedia:Requests for investigation/Archives/2005/04 (1)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox warning yellow.svg This is a discussion archive created in April 2005, though the comments contained may not have been posted on this date. Please do not post any new comments on this page. See current discussion, or the archives index.


Note that this page only partially covers the month of April; see the Archives index for other archives.

April 14


Clarknova (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log)

  • Has vandalized the Sandbox with the text "Political Piggy" numerous times today. After I asked him to stop, he vandalized my User page with the same message. Zscout370 23:20, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

User:Tj raza

User:Calles loco and User:Sla boy and User:Tj raza are all the same person. - Ken Bogan 22:54, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC) Tj raza (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log)

  • Vandalized the user page of Ken Bogan with the autofelatio image and his talk page with random garbage. Zscout370 22:48, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Tj raza put the {{test4}} template on my talk page. - Ken Bogan 22:54, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • I know this vandal personally and have met him and seen him with my own eyes. He was a Mexican-American gangster in Compton, California and was a neighbor of mine before he moved somewhere else. He wants to get some revenge by vandalizing my user page. See my talk page for the whole story - Ken Bogan 22:54, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

User:Sla boy

Sla boy (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log)


User:Calles loco

Calles loco (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log) aka Birthday Vandal

  • (talk · contributions)
    • Has made 15 defacements to articles since March 2005 and has stepped up activity today to 3 in one day. Has had 2 warnings on his /her user talk page , a test1 on 3 march and a test3 on 14 march. Lumos3 21:12, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • (talk · contributions)
    • This user makes many subtle changes to existing pages, usually modifying birth dates. A random sample of talk pages indicates that most of these changes are incorrect. This has also been posted to RC Patrol, but this IP may merit blocking, as he/she has been warned several times on the User:Talk page.

Feco 21:04, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • (talk · contributions)
    • This user has made numerous (20+) vandalism edits, and recieved his final warning on March 31, and he vandalized an article again today. Recommend a block.Bonus Onus 19:07, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)


  • User:SPUI (talk - contributions)
    • Repeated vandalism of Template:Not notable after being warned on his userpage to stop. Firebug 15:52, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • This is a content dispute. If you want to make a template that only you have control over, create it in your userspace. I will not revert it any more because of the Three Revert Rule. --SPUI (talk) 15:56, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
        • This is not a content dispute. The entire purpose of the template is to indicate non-notability. SPUI continues to remove the text and replace it with text saying the opposite of the template's intended purpose. If someone blanked Template:POV and replaced it with a statement saying that the article was completely neutral and factual, that would clearly constitute vandalism. This is no different. Furthermore, SPUI's claims that he would stop reverting are a lie. He has continued to re-vandalize the template. As a member of the extreme inclusionist faction, he feels that everything deserves to be included in Wikipedia, and he feels entitled to vandalize anything he wants to get his way. Firebug 17:23, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The issue seems to be resolved, with Firebug moving the template to his userspace. See Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:Not_notable. TIMBO (T A L K) 16:47, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • I have tagged the template for speedy deletion - not because of User:SPUI's vandalism, but rather because of technical arguments made by User:Radiant! and various others that it unnecessarily loads the server. Both the template and the redirect may now be deleted. Firebug 05:54, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • (talk · contributions)
    • Same old story. Anon user creates nonsense article Das Reich, I flag it as speedy, user removes flag, I reflag it and leave a comment on his talk page, user vandalises my talk page, I revert it, I report him here. JIP | Talk 13:17, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC) (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log)

  • Vandal edits to a number of Arthur Miller related articles, has been warned, but likely to need a block! Jschwa1 11:51, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC) (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log)

Numerous userids

Many userids, which I've presumed to be User:JoeM, have been vandalizing my userpage, User talk:Grunt, Howard Dean, and other articles. See the last three names on User:JoeM. Am going to bed now, so I will not be able to watch for this person. Meelar (talk) 07:01, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)

  • User:
    • Vandalized my user page, twice. User:Joy_Stovall has already warned him twice. Zscout370 03:20, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)


  • User:DrZoidberg
    • Keeps on dumping code into the Sandbox, though it is not for the Weeine Hunt Jr's this time around. I strongly suggest this user should be blocked for a little bit for constant vandalism of the Sandbox. Zscout370 02:43, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • How is this vandalism? Isn't the whole point of the Sandbox that new editors can freely make changes there without having to worry about messing up something important? Firebug 11:34, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • The Sandbox is used for editing, but not for dumping over 130k of code and other stuff inside the Sandbox. Zscout370 16:49, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
        • Note: this user put this into the Sandbox "Everyone is stupid except me." See [3] Zscout370 22:32, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Captain_FREEDOM (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log)

April 13 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log)

  • Vandalising user pages, has been warned and continues. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 22:51, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC) (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log)

  • Vandalising user pages and articles, has been warned and continues. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 22:51, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC) (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log)

  • Vandalising user pages and articles, has been warned and continues. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 22:51, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Constant vandalism of George Washington user was warned twice. Three strikes. -- oo64eva (AJ) (U | T | C) @ 21:34, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)





Inserts spam links unrelated to topic for blackhat search engine optimization

Oliver North Sockpuppets


Other IPs used:


Like I said below, he's back! But yes, despite the fact that the user that was vandalized is a vandal himself, that's still no excuse to vandalize HIS page. -- 01:02, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • User:Natalinaspmf, it would be preferable if you cease removing content from vandals' user pages. Please use the talk pages instead. Some members of the Wikipedia community consider it vandalism. Andrew pmk 02:45, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

April 12

Wikipedia is Marxism

Yep... he's back! -- 00:33, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC) *User: is also Wikipedia is Marxism, since he edited the pages dealing with him. Zscout370 01:25, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

    • No I am not Wikipedia is Marxism. I just noticed the vandalism to his user page and decided to revert it. - 01:38, 13 Apr 2005
      • Report removed. My sincere apologies. Zscout370 01:36, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)


He's been banned for 24 days. -- user:zanimum
IMO, his username also violates the username policy against sexual references. Firebug 00:07, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Intentionally falsifying information in articles, adding profanity/nonsense, etc.

Nonsense warning at User talk:

  • I've looked around and have no idea what policy would recommend for this situation, so I decided to put it here. There is a nonsense warning on page User talk:, but this appears to be a wiki-internal IP which is assigned to incoming visitors. So I suspect the warning is being shown to many visitors, whether they edited anything or not. The warning was added by Viriditas, but I have no specific reason to believe the intent was vandalism. Policy advice is welcome. CoyneT 21:07, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC) Talk
    • Don't worry, Wikipedia uses the external IP. The message will not be displayed to anyone. --cesarb 00:16, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC) &

Vandalizing the University of Georgia page and the page of other universities in Georgia, including Southern Polytechnic State University. I suspect I'm putting myself up for vandalism, but I can defeat some lowlife. User:Atrivedi.

Vanalized various pages such as teletubbies, The Wiggles, and lesbian. User was warned and vandalized my user page. - oo64eva (AJ) 17:47, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)


  • Paranoid (talk · contributions)
    • In Bondage Fairies (history · watch) article, the user keeps a false external link to the hentai series. Instead there's a link to an Internet dating site or a porn site.
      • The link works fine for me -- but I'm on a Mac, perhaps there's some sneaky popup there. Otherwise, this is a content dispute, not vandalism. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 16:59, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC),,,

  • (talk · contributions)
    • Many contributions; earlier contributions seem legitimate but in early April '05 have begun to become nasty and/or vandalism
    • Blocked for 3 days

  • (talk · contributions)
    • See the user contributions page; there are repeated incidents of vandalism over a period of several weeks.
      • Warned on talk page. Thue | talk 13:43, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC) aka Rodger the Rapist

I'm also bumping this to the top of current alerts, since the vandal is active today.

User:Dirtbike & User:

Dirtbike (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log) (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log)

  • Continues to add DRQ, which is a self describe advert for a Detroit radio station, after multiple deletes and request not to create vandalism. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 03:51, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Abusing Lupang Hinirang --Jondel 01:56, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC) and and

April 11

User:Le Migou

Le Migou (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log); seems to be a bot adding nasty pics to people's talk pages - needs to be banned permanently immediately. --tomf688(talk) 17:20, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)

    • Check the history on my talk page if you want evdince - (Erebus555 19:46, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC))

Katie Couric (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log), (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log), etc.

Since February 13, IPs in the 168.253 range have vandalized Katie Couric with various disparaging remarks (lately the target has been reverting Katie's status as "journalist" to something like "entertainer" and "infotainer" [8], [9], earlier vandalisms include remarking how "annoying" it is that she drops the "g" off the end of words [10], [11]). At this point, the IP is the only person editing the article on a semi-daily basis. I'm considering protecting the page, as it's fairly uncontroversial and no one would be dying to edit it. In the meantime, what else can we do? Mike H 16:04, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)

  • While the last two of these edits violate NPOV, I'm not sure they qualify as simple vandalism. Has the user been advised of appropriate NPOV policy? Firebug 17:40, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Repeatedly adding it back for two months "without realizing" WHY their edits were being reverted moves from "clueless newbie" territory and counts as vandalism to me. Check the edit history; this person obviously knows what he's doing if he keeps doing it. Mike H 19:30, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)



  • Unixan
    • On the article The Night of the Long Knives [12]: the content is now "he Night of the Long Bananas. BANANAS ROCK!"

  • (talk · contributions)
    • 9 edits in the past three days, each one of them reverted. Annoying, because some of the edits were not obviously wrong (e.g. changing a year given in an existing article). Tries to push some obscure person. Vandalized my user page after having his article put on VfD. Has been warned. Blanked VfD page. Rl 07:24, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • He's been warned and hasn't edited since, let's wait things out. Mgm|(talk) 10:12, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
    • Correction: He blanked the VfD page half a day after the warning. I did follow the usual procedure. That said, I'm okay with waiting it out. Rl 10:49, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC) and Wikipedia is Communism

He's BAAAAAACKKKK! This time he's going by the name Wikipedia is Marxism. He's made changes to several pages already. One of them (obviously) is Marxism.-- 00:28, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Feco 02:52, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Repeatedly adding defamatory text to Nerd, Pope John Paul II, Autoerotic asphyxiation -- Dcfleck 02:38, 2005 Apr 11 (UTC)


Orange Death aka The Pokemon Vandal


April 10



  • Pashtun (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log)
    • We have one person, mostly editing as an anon, clearly having exceeded 3RR, warring with four of us who are trying to defend what is clearly the consensus version of this article. The insertions are clearly non-encyclopedic; I can't protect it, because I've contributed to the article. PLEASE someone protect this page, this has been going on over 24 hours! -- Jmabel | Talk 21:03, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)

User:Wikipedia is Communism


I reverted the edit of on Prince William because of vandalism. Afterwards probably the same editor but different ip vandalized my user page, and then under vandalized my project. This editor appears to be from the UK. User then decided to vandalize Child abuse and was reverted by Joy Stovall. then retaliated and vandalized User:Joy Stovall's user page. oo64eva (AJ) 20:55, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • User: also vandalized my userpage [15]. Not sure what I reverted of his, but it must've been something. I've been watching RC this afternoon. Katefan0 21:07, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)



Pavel Vozenilek

Newgrounds (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log) (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log) (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log) (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log) (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log) (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log)

April 9 has been actively vandalizing the Paul Wolfowitz page by replacing its content with mocking term about the person like academic cheesecake. Several uses reverted the mess that had created. Could you please block the user? The username itself signifies his/her intent; he/she has no interest in adding anything constructive to the page aboutPaul Wolfowitz. Thanks. Rananim 22:40, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia is Communism

User:Wikipedia Is Communism has been acivelyt vandalising pages, replacing all content with the hammer and sickle image. I'm currently reverting their mess. Please block them. The username itself signifies their intent; they have no interest in doing anything constructive here. Jez 22:22, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

He is blocked indefinitely since 22:16 UTC. Lupo 22:25, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)


User:LibraryLion, talk, Contributions has twice vandalsised User:SqueakBox here and here, --SqueakBox 20:48, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)

HatDood is a persistent vandal of Javier Solana. Has attacked that and my user page just now, and again, needs blocking urgently, Here and here--SqueakBox 17:44, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)

Blocked for 24 hours. Antandrus 22:33, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Reincarnated as a couple of other IPs, this time with Bellsouth (, On his way to being blocked again. Antandrus 01:45, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

C-list actor

  • C-list actor (talk · contributions) has been using sockpuppets on VfDs all day. Was blocked by Brian0918 but sockpuppets are still active. The sockpuppets usernames are easily identifyable: A1, B2, C3, E5, F6, G7, H8, I9, J10, down to Z26. D4 is not a sockpuppet of this user, due to it being a registered account beforehand. Examples of sockpuppeting can be seen on the VfD for Goomba. The sockpuppets have not been blocked and continue to disrupt VfD affairs. Username suggests connection to B-movie bandit. Hedley 03:24, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

April 8



    • For the past several days has been vandalizing a variety of articles. and (and now Dark-Shadow)


    • The activity of this user seems to consist exclusively of adding probable-spam external links to pages. In many or all cases, the added links appear to point to commercially-operated sites of little educational value, although the added links are relevant to the subject matter of the affected pages. No explanation appears to ever be provided about why the links were inserted. The most recent example was the digital photography page, which has had the same dubious external link added to it twice in recent days (both reverted by me). Many other such examples (often, but not always, followed by rapid reverts) can be found in the user's contribution history. Cat5nap 19:42, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Same user has also beem spamming money- and finance-related articles. The links are loosely topical but still inappropriate. Feco 17:52, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • (talk · contributions)
    • Please can somebody block this user as soon as possible. Is repeatedly adding pages with "You Hitler loving bastards!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" and "I'll dismemeber your fucking balls from your fucking dick and use it to beat you and your fucking friends." Has been block before --Bucephalus 17:38, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Agwiii has been reported to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive742#Legal threats. This is the second time in 3 days he has falsely accused me here of vandalism. there is no evidence, --SqueakBox 16:15, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)

Lotsofissues 13:25, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • (talk · contributions)
    • Vandalised Platform game by replacing entire contents with hammer-and-sickle logo. After I reverted the vandalism, he vandalised my talk page the same way. I reverted it too. This user was previously reported as a vandal on April 5, so I think it's time to block him now. JIP | Talk 11:07, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • (talk · contributions)
    • Repeatedly vandalising various pages this morning alone. Numerous changes of links to contain homophobia. Reverting these changes is growing tiresome. I suggest at least a few days ban to get the message home.

  • (talk · contributions)
    • Repeatedly vandalising Parkour, regularly, over a period of several months. Numerous changes of links to contain homophobia, changing links to '' and removal of important links (eg. Parkour Worldwide Association). Reverting these changes is growing tiresome. Regardless of how 'useful' this user's changes elsewhere are, I suggest at least a few days ban to get the message home. That or Parkour is locked. There have been very few useful changes recently.
    • This vandalism still continues. --Lucien 00:51, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC) vel "Arturas"

  • (talk · contributions)
  • (talk · contributions)
  • (talk · contributions)
    • vandalised Vilna Gaon (history · watch)
    • Since the end of March this vandal repeatedly changes the above pages, refuses or ignores any discussion, stubbornly removes contents to suit his POV/taste/ideas, attempts to offend other wikipedians calling them nazis, directing to gas chambers and such, removes parts of others discussions (that he does not participate in) from talk pages. Has been warned a couple of times and obviously does this on purpose.
    • The vandal uses randomly assigned addresses from the range. Several of these addresses have been blocked by individual administrators but this does not seem to be any effective measure in this case. I suggest blocking the whole range for a longer period (one or two weeks for start). None of these addresses has been used by any other user and for any other purpose than vandalizing the above pages, so the risk of any collateral damage is minimal compared to the time that people have wasted for this guy so far.
    • Please help in an effective way. Wojsyl 18:01, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Repeated anon vandalism on Lithuania and Vilnius pages. Few registered users try to keep reverting pages... --Monkbel 17:05, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support. Note this is not only 192 - he uses the 193,194 and 195 ranges as well. I try to revert when I can but he is dedicated. Note 2 - he also vandalises Polish-Lithuanian_Commonwealth. Note 3 - I am an admin, but since the vandal uses such wide IPs I believe range block is the only thing I can do - but blocking so many adressess...I have never done it before, I'd appreciate advice here. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:27, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Support. I ignored the guy calling me a Nazi, a Polish chauvinist, a Slavic pig and even tried to ignore his remarks that Slavs should be sent to gas chambers, but to no effect, there's no way we could force this person to be cooperative. I'm afraid there's no other option but to block his IP and wait 'til he grows up. Halibutt 19:50, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
    • Support I support a block on 85.206.19?.* . Yes it's a large address block, but have we seen any useful contributions from the block. Has anyone done any reverse DNS on this to see where these IP's are coming from? Klonimus 06:55, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • Actually this should not be 85.206.19?.* but (note the 22 bit netmask), which makes together only about 1000 addresses. They belong to, a Lithuanian provider, I don't expect that temporary block could make any harm at all, as we've not seen any other activities from these addresses than the recent vandalism. OTOH, the vandal keeps down today, so maybe this will not be necessary at all ? Wojsyl 12:09, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
        • My experience is in being an IRC ChanOp, and so blocks are expressed as 85.206.19?.* using ?/* as wildcards. It's the same thing. Klonimus 04:28, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • He's back again. Two of the pages had been protected. Wojsyl 09:11, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Feco 08:13, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Adding people's names as being a meaning of Homosexuality. Also vandalising Papal articles. Hedley 02:27, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

April 7

  • This user has made several malicious edits recently. Usually other have already caught them. Most recent was article on spiders. All up to this time have now been found and corrected. P0M 19:07, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC) (also known as


Changing Sikkim to offensive picture. Jimaginator 13:36, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)

    • Several other articles too. Was on a real binge this morning.

April 6

Reclasifying things, without knowing what they are. SHould be blocked.--Jirate 19:46, 2005 Apr 6 (UTC)

  • This includes adding Category:Transport in Merseyside to the Wirral Railway article. I don't see how this counts as vandalism, though deleting it without explanation except for an edit summary accusing the anon editor of vandalism comes close. It certainly doesn't constute a blocking offence, nor even an entry here. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 20:57, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • No. The consensus of other editors is that the anon is acting in good faith. Of course, whether the anon's categorisation is the best scheme or not is up for (polite) debate. Irate should assume good faith and avoid biting the newbies. (He would also be better off spending his time mounting a defence for his Arbitration case, rather than making his situation worse by continuing to call editors "scum"). — Matt Crypto 23:34, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Creates vandlism pages, add nonsense to some pages, has also added typos. Been warned & blocked before. Now warned again, has no effect. Solver 18:38, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Blocked for 24 hours by me. I speedy deleted half a dozen of his nonsense pages. jni 18:47, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)



  • vandal | User:Lmcs
    • Haven't used this page before, so I hope this is a proper citation. The fellow has created a string of "funny" articles, usually involving adolescent visions of sex, his buddies as authors and/or characters in the stories, and overall continued non-productive, destructive edits. The user has been warned twice. His contributions include Dubensmelf and Back chair. He has persisted over 5 days in thinking himself immune. Geogre 16:22, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Bludngutz (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log) (talk · contribs) is vandalizing a series of articles on Biology, Anthropology and related science issues -- replacing each article with long rambling material about fossils all being of the same age. When I tried to revert Anthropology, the system would only let me preview the change. But, others came to the rescue. All articles reverted. WBardwin 08:46, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)


The_Matrix (history · watch)

This article has been repeatedly, anonymously vandalized with the rationale of "This was a stub that was voted on by the wikipedia community to be merged and re-directed to here." (regarding the reference to Matrixism). While that was true, the reference was given a factual edit and in fact remains in the present version of the article. Constant, unwarranted, anonymous reversions of good-faith edits constitute vandalism and should be treated as such.

List_of_religions (history · watch)

Constantly adds "Matrixism" to all categories. There is no clear evidence "Matrixism" is a real religion. Wikipedia is not advertisement.

Vandal using dynamic IP and constantly changing IP's to hide his trail. History shows that this vandal is responsible for most work on the now-deleted article Matrixism, indicating probable use of Wikipedia for self-promotion and promotion of supposed "Matrixism" religion.

Philwelch 05:55, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

April 5

  • (talk · contributions)
    • Adding spam linking to '' to various pages related to Game Shows. --Kyrin\talk 22:47, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
      • I'm keeping an eye on them, but they seem to have stopped as soon as I mentioned that they might be blocked.-gadfium 22:52, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)


  • Clout (talk · contributions)
    • This user has created a nonsense/vanity article (Clout three times today. It has been speedily deleted twice. The third time, the user had opened an account , and I moved the page to his User page (unfortunately I've just noticed that someone slapped a VfD notice on it while i was moving it; I'll go there now). Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:30, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

--Kyrin\talk 20:59, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)

Continuously recovers an old version of the article [José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero]. More information in Talk:José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero/Dispute.

Inserted the same obscenities into the Howard Dean article as yesterday's vandal (but from a different IP address).


Doopokko 07:20, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Doopokko 07:22, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

April 4

  • (talk · contributions)
    • Repeatedly vandalising Parkour over a period of several months. Numerous changes of links to contain homophobia, changing links to '' and removal of important links (eg. Parkour Worldwide Association). Reverting these changes is growing tiresome.


      • Blocked for one week after several warnings. Very likely previously vandalizing as User:Gumba gumba andy 21:50, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Isn't gumba gumba really really cool? ♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫_♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫󰌛♫♫♫♫♫♫5;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&#983♫♫♫♫♫♫ϙ♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫𘀟♫♫♫♫♫♫&5;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&#983#9835;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫̓♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫𘗻♫♫♫♫♫�♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫ ♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫#9835;♫♫♫♫♫&#983♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫5;♫♫♫♫♫♫&#♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫9835;♫♫♫♫♫&#9835♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫;♫♫♫♫♫♫&#9♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫835;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫𘈓♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫Χ♫♫♫♫♫♫&835;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&#9#9835;♫♫♫♫♫󰌛♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫_♫♫♫♫♫♫̓♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫𘗻♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&##9835;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&9835;♫♫♫♫♫&#9835#9835;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&;♫♫♫♫♫♫&#9#9835;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&835;♫♫♫♫♫♫#9835;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&♫♫♫♫♫♫&#98#9835;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&35;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&#983#9835;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&5;♫♫♫♫♫♫&##9835;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&9835;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫Χ♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫𘈓♫♫♫♫♫♫35;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&#98♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&#9835#9835;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&;♫♫♫♫♫♫&#9#9835;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&835;♫♫♫♫♫♫#9835;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&♫♫♫♫♫♫&#98#9835;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&35;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫𘀟♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫ϙ♫♫♫♫♫♫#♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫󱪋♫♫♫♫♫󰇯♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫b♫♫♫♫♫♫Χ♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫𘈓♫♫♫♫♫♫35;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&#98♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫ ♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫�♫♫♫♫♫♫;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&#9835♫♫♫♫♫♫b♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫󰇯♫♫♫♫♫♫&;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&#9835#9835;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫&#;♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫�♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫



  • Netoholic (talk · contributions)
    • This user is in arbitration, and is going out in style, making destructive edits to a number of pages. Case in point:
    • Template:Divbox -- tagging structural template, causing chain-reaction disruption in several places on which disputed template appears.
Please note the issue is not the nomination for deletion of the template, or initial placing {tfd} on template, or hostile tone. Tag moved to talk page and TfD process continues. User reverted tag to template itself, re-creating disruption; user warned; user reverted again. Another user (User:Susvolans) repaired vandalism; user warned again. User reverted again and asked to be listed here. Please see Talk for explanation and demonstration of template vandalism.
User has repeated this pattern of attack on at least five templates. — XiongXiong2char.pngtalk 20:53, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC)

Additional request from another user: please do not mark the article as protected at this time; responsible users are in the middle of significant improvements. —Brent Dax 19:06, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • (talk · contributions)
  • User has vandalised at least 4 different articles in the past several minutes; contiues after warning. Zizzybaluba 17:54, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • He's now making death threats on the talk page. - Lucky 6.9 18:05, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • Can somebody please block this user. Vandalism and making threats against other users --Bucephalus 18:10, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Fifteen vandalized articles plus the talk page just today. - Lucky 6.9 18:12, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Warned using {{subst:test2}} --Tony Sidaway|Talk 15:33, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

-- P Ingerson 10:43, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

--grin 10:07, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC)

--Peter McGinley 8:53, 4th April 2005 (UTC)

--Ixfd64 07:21, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC)

==== IP ====
* {{subst:user | IP or username}}
** [[Hair root sheath cell of Henle's layer]] This is a really weird article...I'm not sure if this is vandalism or not but someone should check it out.



Falun Gong vandals (69.158.18*.*) (Women's cycling vandal)

April 3 22:20, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Flarn2005 and KOMBA


Continues to vandalize John Paul II, Led Zeppelin, and other articles despite repeated reverts and warnings.

- Reporter: User:Markl222 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Suck my Sock

  • Suck my Sock! (talk contribs)
    • See contributions. Adding many many articles with large picture of a sock. Needs blocking immediately. The JPS 19:46, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

See contrib list

Continues to vandalize User:Anilocra, been rv'ed many times. Block requested. Solver 15:40, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Blocked for 24 hours. Carbonite | Talk 15:47, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Just before being blocked, they logged in as User:Musichopper (the name of the site they've been spamming) and stuck an abusive threat to vandalise on my talk page. Anilocra 16:04, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This IP has continued to vandalize the article on Pope John Paul II. When an anonymous user reverted the edits, he/she posted a Port Scan (NMAP) of that IP to the article. Damicatz 14:21, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC) et al.

Vandalising Whirlpool (web site).

Silenceisfoo 11:21, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Warned most recent vandal. Will wait to see what happens next. Mgm|(talk) 14:13, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)



    • This IP is up to 4 edits now, all racist vandalism of this same article. I think it's time to stand him in the corner for 24 hours. Firebug 10:57, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Both John Paul II and Pope, but especially the former are being attacked by multiple vandalisers right now, --SqueakBox 01:01, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)

The Farts of Jesus

  • The Farts of Jesus (talk · contributions)
    • Vandalized several user pages. JYolkowski 00:54, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • Appears to have been handled: 00:54, 3 Apr 2005, Nunh-huh blocked The Farts of Jesus (expires indefinite) (contribs) (inappropriate user name)

April 2

  • (talk · contributions)
    • Keeps adding a reference to a fake character "Deviler" in the Alien experiment (Lilo & Stitch) article. Numerous reverts have been - made, but the reference keeps being added by the same user. :( We've explained the reverts on the edit summaries, on the talk pages and even on the user's talk page.
    • Also adds erroneous info to Thomas the Tank Engine related article (see user's contribution page).
    • Has just added the same erroneous info to almost all the Thomas the Tank Engine related articles. Its taken me a good 30 minutes to revert all of them. I'll mention this at WP:AN/I also. Thryduulf 23:04, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

User:Archeos ;  ;

  • (talk · contributions)
    • This user needs to be blocked because I kept reverting him/her at the new Garbage album Bleed Like Me. So do these other users at the history of the page, see here. -- Mike Garcia 00:50, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • This user keeps changing the information to correctly state that Bleed Like Me will be released by Warner Bros on April 11th 2005, except in North America, where it will be released on April 12th 2005. For some reason, Mike keeps on reverting this to state that it it will be released in Europe on April 11th and the USA on April 12th. While this is technically correct, User:'s revision is more correct as it accounts for all of the world. ~~
    • Page protected due to content dispute. Please only use this page for listing VANDALISM. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 14:20, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

April 1



  • Brian0918 (talk · contributions)
    • Numerous & persistant graphical page defacing.
      • Please sign reports. Brian was warned his April Fool's jokes were disruptive and has since stopped. All edits reverted. Mgm|(talk) 21:49, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)

Vandalized Idiot, Perfect, Cannabis, Alien, Gay and Biologist. Taco Deposit | Talk-o to Taco 20:37, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)

  • (talk · contributions)
    • User is back, vandalising Girls Aloud again. Been blocked before, perhaps again? -Kbdank71 17:57, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • Blocked, increased length by 24 hours (is now at 96h). Mgm|(talk) 21:54, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
    • Back again, has reports of vandalism from today and yesterday on their user page. 96h seems unreasonably lenient to me, but what do I know.

  • (talk · contributions)
    • Either conscious vandalism or just spam-gone-badder - adds necktie-related spam link to related articles (like Silk and Bowtie). Trying to open the link made my Firefox go crazy. Blockable? / Uppland 17:34, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)



  • [31]
    • has been adding photo of the Ramones to various pages.

-Casito 04:05, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia wide issue

  • Article Discussion Edit this page + History Move Watch

I just noticed the top items have been replaced with new terms, is this wikipedia wide wandalims or not? Or is it a twisted April fools joke that I do not appriciate.

  • Article Groupthink Censor + History Teleport Stalk

--Cool Cat My Talk 07:03, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

    • I think it was an April Fools joke. I appreciated it, at least. JIP | Talk 06:49, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

User:G Rider


  • DreamGuy (talk · contributions)
    • Patricia Cornwell (history · watch) DreamGuy is deleting notice of a clear NPOV violation. He's also making false statements now to attack me, really sounds like he's on Patricia Cornwell's payroll. To repeat: The "Patricia Cornwell" page has been hijacked for criminal and propaganda purposes False statements have been inserted regarding current felony crimes involving Cornwell - this is actually a new felony crime of "obstruction of justice" using Wikipedia. The real facts of Cornwell's life of many scandals are systematically deleted/omitted. A large part of the page is devoted now to a libelous, deceptive, highly personal attack on Cornwell's biographer. Seems like people on Cornwell's payroll have been trying to use Wikipedia as their tool. The page needs major re-work after Cornwell's agents are ejected.Drlsachs 21:17, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I can't find any evidence of the allegations you made. Please discuss content disputes with DreamGuy himself or go through proper dispute resolution. Mgm|(talk) 08:34, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)



  • User had repeatedly inserted links to the Maoist International Movement Movie Reviews for about a dozen movies on those pages. After removing the links for being non-notable, spam and POV, the User simply reverted them all back in. So far, three seperate users have called him on it and asked him to stop and he simply continues to revert, crossing the line into vandalism. He has stopped for the time being, but has stopped before only to revert all the pages again a few hours later. --TheGrza 03:42, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)

Short-term memory again! Pleas block him!--Ot 16:35, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Blocked for 24 hours. Phils 22:06, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Whodidit, later logged in as =gk=boy

  • (talk · contribs)
    • Vandalised and blanked Windows XP, and its talk page (death threat). Now logged in as User:=gk=boy. --RobertG 10:46, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Had a go at my user page, too - presumably in retaliation for my reverting. Can someone else deal with this? --RobertG 11:39, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) (talk · contribs) 09:32, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) and

April 24



Since Loshvosh valdalized this page a total of 4 times, I ask that his IP be blocked. CoolFox 02:48, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)

Ruy Lopez

My "vandalism" is a reversion I did on History of Japan, actually the one reversion to the one edit I ever did on that page. The sentence had said "U.S. objectives were to transform Japan into a more democratic country that would never again be a military threat; later, in the face of the Cold War and the Korean War, Japan came to be seen as a crucial ally." which I felt was a little POV so I changed it to "U.S. objectives were to ensure that Japan would become an ally and an anti-communist capitalist country." Curps reverted my edit, and I reverted it back because what Curps said made little sense. This is the best example Vozenilek can find for his attempt to call me a vandal. I should note that this wasn't discussed back and forth on that page or elsewhere, he just saw that revert and decided to list me here. Whatever. This is nonsensical and he's already taken up five minutes more of my life than he deserves to. Ruy Lopez 03:08, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I am much more arguing about your style of edits which is POV vandalism by definition. I for example do not like that you started on reverting my changes w/o giving explanation. I for example know something about Prague Spring yet you obviously have formed opinion once forever. Pavel Vozenilek 04:07, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • (talk · contribs)
    • Constantly recreates the speedied nonsense article R0xes, which consists of rants like "DONT DELETE THIS" and "i am so 1337." The first time I speedied the article, he deleted the speedy tag. sɪzlæk [ +t, +c ] 23:13, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)

Antaeus FeIdspar (talk · contribs)

Antaeus FeIdspar (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log) (note that this is an attempt to impersonate Antaeus Feldspar (talk · contribs); vandal has capital I instead of lower-case L in username) is probably the same person as (talk · contribs) and (talk · contribs), given that their first edit was to revert the article to which almost all of 227/229's edits have been made. The second was to create a fake "personal bio" for purposes of harassment. Please block this impersonating vandal quickly. -- Antaeus Feldspar 16:38, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Jagginess (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log) created racist rant Wikipedia Sucks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (which I have marked as a Speedy) TigerShark 15:03, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Yeah, Jagginess has been making some confusing edits, introducing poor grammar into articles like Linux, Linux distribution, and JavaScript. A few people explained that his changes were being reverted due to his grammar, then I guess he blew up and flamed User:Smyth pretty harshly. Funny thing is he was talking about how Americans can't speak English correctly, of all things. I guess he wrote the article at that time too. Hope he doesn't return. Rhobite 03:10, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)

Queentumi (talk · contribs) / (talk · contribs)

Assuming these are the same person - both users have been vandalising Names of God, Anton, Texas, and Anton adding non-verifiable nonsense about the word being "a mid western slave name for the Egyptian God Aten." Also added the Resurgence of antonarian monotheistic concepts, page, which I've put up for speedy deletion. --Dcfleck 12:55, 2005 Apr 24 (UTC) (talk · contribs)

Blocked for 12 hours. SlimVirgin (talk) 10:45, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
Great job. Thanks SV. Svest 11:16, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
Gee, with all she's done, I think we need to consider giving SV some sort of "most trolls stomped" award! Master Thief Garrett 11:22, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

User:Moral Clarity

  • Moral Clarity (talk · contributions)
    • An exterem POV vandal, has been warned, continues, it is someones sockpuppett, seen the userpage before, but i cant find whos it is. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 08:37, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Appears to be a sockpuppet of//current sock to Cap. Freedom. They've got the same "what America mus conquer" page. I can't tell, but has Cap. Freedom been banned or warned yet? Master Thief Garrett 22:50, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • NOTE: Boothy443, please don't be offended, but I've decided to resubmit this guy. People *do* care about vandals, believe me, and he WILL be dealt with given time. I will update this list myself with any and all new dirt I dig up, so you don't have to worry so much, OK? Master Thief Garrett 09:54, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • further vandalism since this posting, adding highly contentious and anti-Muslim statements to José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. While he appears to be a sockpuppet, it seems that each "foot" is vandalising a different page from the rest so it can't be traced back to the "body" quite so easily. He's a slippery one... Master Thief Garrett 09:54, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • By looking through his history, EVERY ACTION this editor has made has been malicious. I'm sorry, but I can't find any good in him. He seems to be pure malice, out to deface anything that doesn't mirror his own views. Master Thief Garrett 10:10, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
        • Fortunatley, nixie has blocked him indefinately for the reasons that Boothy443 and Master Thief Garrett has stated above. A more detailed account of what he did certainly would still be useful. -JCarriker 10:17, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
          • You want a blow-by-blow report? I'll throw one together sometime soon... Master Thief Garrett 10:22, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)


  • (talk · contribs)
    • DESCRIPTION vandalized Eugene,Oregon on March 13 2005,Charles II of England on March 12,2005, online poker on Mar 13 - generally by deleting all the article and subsituting garbage characters or infantile filth (one of his IDs)- uses various IDs and appears to be followed up by who adds further filth - these are his last 3 posts - didn't check to see if all the earlier ones were also vandalism - similar vandalism to George W. Bush on March 12 also




  • Jmabel (talk · contribs)
    • Vandalised Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by military branch. Added section that stated "MAKE LOVE NOT WAR". This is NOT the place for political views. Linuxbeak 03:05, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
      • I will point out that this is from an editor who seems to think (judging by his or her own edits to that page) that "Army…HOOAH!", "Navy…AYE AYE!", Marine Corps…OOH-RAH!", Air Force…AIR POWER!", and Coast Guard…AYE AYE!" are NPOV. -- Jmabel | Talk 03:27, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
      • As you can see, my supposed vandalism included (1) a spelling correction (2) noting the fact that the U.S. Military is not the only military in the world, and (3) an addition which might be argued to be in questionable taste, but I do not believe in the context of the many humorous additions to the various lists of Wikipedians constitutes vandalism. -- Jmabel | Talk 03:34, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
        • And I will point out that these are the motavational cries of each corresponding branch of service. When different branches, especially during a parade, are called to report in, their members frequently shout out their cry. As this catagory is one of gathering Wikipedians who are from all branches of the military, it doesn't seem like this would be POV at all. In addition, I still don't think "Objectors" are an official part of the Pentagon, and I don't think MAKE LOVE NOT WAR is a registered motavational cry. Linuxbeak 03:41, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
          • I reformated the list like all the others and the problem went away. Peace brothers. BrokenSegue 03:45, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

User:isitel and User:

  • Isitel (talk · contribs) and
    • Three article vandalism edits (Belly, Belly (band), Nudity) starting at 21:47, 23 Apr 2005. But then did an edit to Vallejo I assumed incorrectly was vandalism. Then created a page called Asarim about a book that doesn't exist in -- I can't tell if it's vandalism now because user has now posted some apparently correct edits in Vallejo, using a newly created user Isitel account, possibly to continue future vandalism. Asarim appears to be nonsense because originally was created with a nonsense url link, which user Isitel removed after seeing me mark page for speedy delete. Created Isitel page at 22:12, 23 Apr 2005 (first Isitel edit of Asarim) and is currently trying to repeatedly remove giveaway nonsense URL on Asarim page now that I marked it for deletion. Isitel then just went to Isitel user page at 22:36, 23 Apr 2005 to remove the nonsense URL "" which Isitel previously listed on own user page because user knows this gives away vandalism intent because I listed Asarim for deletion. Isitel has since made a couple of correct edits about a town in Spain and historical figure Vallejo, so at this point I leave it to you people to figure this out. Isitel and the IP person claim Asarim was written by "Ed & Marisa Vallejo," about whom nothing exists on the Internet. — Emerman 02:49, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Update: I have removed my speedy delete tag from Asarim and will leave it to you guys about whether to list it as candidate for deletion; it may be a vanity page about an unpublished book written by the person who created the page (who used strange URLs he then deleted) but I don't want to get involved further because I'm not an admin & don't want to draw more vandalism either. I only became aware of all this because the originating poster previously vandalized a page I watch and someone else corrected the vandalism. — Emerman 03:38, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)



April 23


UDoN't!wAn*, Chunkyhoyo and any other sockpuppets.

Whodunit and Whodidit and Whoisit and Whowasit and now Whowillitbe

  • Whodunit (talk · contribs) and Whodidit (talk · contribs) and Whoisit (talk · contribs) and Whowasit (talk · contribs) and Whowillitbe (talk · contribs)
    • Repeated and ongoing vandalism of user pages and many random articles. --Viriditas | Talk 12:44, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • I second this. He hit my user page with the text "Are you allied with bush? Papa Ratzi won't be pleased" and then put a "votes for deletion" tag under it. I have since removed it but it's in the history. Pacian 15:16, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Added Whodidit. Noisy | Talk 15:24, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
    • He hit my user page, too. Obviously and gleefully vandalizing pages, thumbing nose at Wikipedia. [40] --BaronLarf 16:09, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
      • Added all my other sock puppets. Who am I? Just remember, lightning never strikes the same place twice. Thank you for welcoming me into Wikipedia. I'm sure I'll have a great time! Watch out! --Whowillitbe 15:53, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
        • This clearly isn't random vandalism. This is vandalism with a purpose. Can we check his IP address? Matthew Platts 16:28, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[42], [43], [44] [45] and more... --Vinsci 10:12, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)


  • (talk · contribs)
    • Vandalising the John Edwards page, and has worked out how to protect the pages when he does it. How do you revert such vandalism? Where do you report to? --Harro5 07:07, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
      • Warned user; he's stopped for now. Incidentally, he added {{protected}} without actually protecting (of course), suggesting some familiarity with Wikipedia. — Knowledge Seeker 07:33, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
        • hmmm... this does not bode well. This tag isn't listed on any of the "How To..." pages, so how the heck did he/she find out about it in the first place??? Not to say this is necessarily an experienced user deciding to lash out anonymously, but even so... strange... Master Thief Garrett 08:07, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • (talk · contribs)
    • Added vanity article Nate, keeps removing speedy deletion tag, etc.
    • Added a new article, Cock9, about how we suck (in no uncertain terms). As he says there, look at his contributions, he's crapped up countless pages worth of hard work. If there was ever a candidate for blink-of-an-eye banning speed, it would definitely be our new friend here. Master Thief Garrett 05:39, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • both articles have been deleted, so, for reference, he said that any pages with "nate" as the edit description were ones he messed with. And he was true to his word all right... Master Thief Garrett 05:49, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

User: > Alaa Mubarak Repeat offender Squash 03:38, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Jimbo_Donal_Wales (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log)

  • Vandalized this page and others. Reincarnation of a banned user, and also chose a user that impersonates another user (Jimbo Wales). Zscout370 03:06, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Jimbo Donal Wales

  • Adding "[[Image:Hammer_sickle_clean.png|thumb|Wikipedia is Communism!]]" on various pages. Amerika 03:06, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Well that was quick, good work guys. Amerika 03:06, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)


April 22


    • Spamming I think for Tony Blair, created a new page titled Education, education, education, one of Blair's catchphrases and redirected it to Tony Blair. With the help of a more experienced user it has been listed for deletion but I believe this was rather blatant vandalism by the user in order to promote Blair on Google searches. Perhaps there is another explanation but seems like vandalism to me. UDoN't!wAn* 22:49, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The link showing the vandalism

Article says "Last weekend Tony Blair repeated his mantra of "education, education, education".

What? I looked up "education, education, education" thinking there might possibly be an article on it, as it is a very famous slogan. Upon seeing that there was no article, I thought it might conceivably be helpful to someone to be redirected to Tony Blair, the guy who said it. Am I being accused of being a Blair lover? I hate the guy. As prime minister of the world fourth largest economic power, I hardly think Blair needs me to boost his pagerank. Is this a joke listing? — Helpful Dave 23:34, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I saw this and had the same "huh?" reaction. I hardly think this is "blatant vandalism" and creating the redirect makes perfect sense. --MPerel ( talk | contrib) 23:38, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)

It is certainly not a joke. I note your failure to respond to me directly also. The point is that it is a slogan used by Tony Blair although naturally enough the word "Education" is not synonymous with Blair at all. Blair is currently going through an election and I believe that was the reason for the placement of what amounts to be promotional material for "Helpful Dave's" candidate. The redirection will be deleted, but the user should be admonished if not permanently terminated. I am not satisfied with the explanation proferred by any means. UDoN't!wAn* 00:34, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The excuse offered for the vandalism is obviously inadequate. If it was such a famous slogan, in which the vandal had keen interest then he would have written a brief article about it, instead he did what I see many spammers do and try to trick Google with links and descriptions of links to maximize the amount of traffic they receive. I don't care either way about Blair or his slogan it just saddens me to see "Helpful Dave" misuse Wikipedia's high rankings in Google for his own political ends. It's not what it should be about. UDoN't!wAn* 00:39, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This isn't vandalism. Isn't even close. Please read Wikipedia:Vandalism: vandalism is "indisputably bad-faith". Feel free to vote to delete the redirect, but please don't accuse others of vandalism when they are clearly acting in good faith. Rhobite 00:49, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
Hello, I may misunderstand what vandalism is I looked it up and saw references to spamming and thought yes the chap has definitely indulged in political promotionalism. I must admit I am confused about why you think the offending redirection should be deletion but the offense which caused it should remain unmolested. UDoN't!wAn* 00:57, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)b
I really must emphasize that it is vandalism otherwise you will see an epidemic of "Stronger America" diverting to John Kerry, and every slogan used by a politico and their paid promotionalists cloggging up the Wikipedia in its entirety. And how would that be? Only by cutting out the cancerous tumor now can you be certain the vandalism of this promotional nature be circumvented. UDoN't!wAn* 01:00, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I don't see any reason to delete it, but I'm not going to discourage you from voicing your opinion. Rhobite 01:04, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)


Chaging votes in the Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Virtual Commonwealth of Cyberia page. RickK 16:20, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Vandalizing Wal-Mart articles. -The lorax 15:32, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

User:Agathocles of Bactria

Apparent breaching experiments (see his User page) using an unusual article as an Internet troll. Previous incarnations of this User, (he helpfully provides a list on his User page) attempt to publish a POV on the scientific method, which are regularly reverted, of course. Ancheta Wis 10:59, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) Clear trolling behavior; he has just hit my user page. Ancheta Wis 11:28, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) I quote: "I was a public account and a sockpuppet of banned user Iasson. My account is no longer public, because fellow wikipedians have more sense than I do. Agathocles of Bactria 11:27, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)" 11:33, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I am o sockpupet of Faethon...anyway.... YOU vandalized my homepage first! Your vanadlism (look at the time) and then, as an answer, My vandalism (look at the time too) . So stop complaining to administrators noticeboard, like a chicken! Ageladas 11:59, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This was another reincarnation of the banned user Iasson/Faethon. These are "public accounts" where the password is the same as the username. The common practice for dealing with these is:
  • log into the account and change the password to something random (also blank the email address if one is provided)
  • make a note on the user and/or talk pages of the account to say that it is no longer public (optionally using the {{sockpuppet|Iasson}} template.
  • using the account, post a note at WP:AN/I:
    • request that Iasson's ban timer is reset (he is banned for 1 year from the date of his most recent contribution - see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Iasson).
    • Sign the post (~~~~) followed by a note of your account ([[user:MyUser]]).
  • log out of that account and back in as yourself
  • post a note at WP:AN/I immediately below the one you just made to confirm that it was you.
I know this is long winded (it took me about 5 minutes to do that for Agathocles of Bactria), but if you aren't an administrator it is all you can do.
If you want, you can help the community spot new incarnations by looking at user:Thryduulf/Users named after ancient Greeks every so often (instructions are on that page). Thryduulf 11:52, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Another user in this series Agesilaus I (talk · contribs) vandalised my user page. Please can we have an IP ban - this is getting ridiculous (we've had 5 new socks (and counting) today). see WP:AN/I Thryduulf 13:35, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

And I request a 2 days IP bann of user Agesander , as beeing a sockpupet of user Thryduulf. Agesilaus I 13:42, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

No objection to that IP ban, as Agesander and I are not the same person. Thryduulf 14:09, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Of course you are the same person! You admitted that you currently have the password of Agesander! So I am asking a 2 days ban for all the IPs of Agesander (probably you have more than one IPs, noone having a single IP gives it so easily, like you did). Agesilaus I 14:15, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I did change the password of Agesander, but I cannot remember what to. I followed the link to a random page and landed up at the article of someone I'd never heard of. I selected a couple of random words from that article and set that as the password.
I do edit from more than one IP address, because I edit from home and work.
  • My IP address here at work is: My traffic here goes through a proxy server, so it is likely the IP of that machine.
  • The only other address I've edited from recently is my home one, which starts with 80. (I can't remember what it is, but if needed will quote it later when I am at home, likely to be no earlier than 18:30 British Summer Time). This is an IP on Tiscali's UK broadband network, which will be dynamic. However as it is an always-on connection, the IP will have remained the same since it was last disconnected - which I believe would have been when the power got turned off a couple of weeks ago when we were having building work done.
  • Previously I have also edited from the computer society at university, the IP of their (iirc) is; my mobile phone (no idea about the IP there); an internet lounge in Newcaslte-upon-Tyne Aiport; and my uncles' house (I don't know what network he is on).
There may be others as well that I can't remember off the top of my head. Thryduulf 15:15, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Vandalized penis. — Ŭalabio 07:00, 2005 Apr 22 (UTC)


Posting rude, vulgar, and nonsense comments on my talk page. Had a history of vandalizing articles. See here or See the entire history page for more of his nonsense -- Stevey7788 06:19, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

repeatedly vandalized certain pages. kelvSYC 04:54, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)


DreamGuy attempts to trouble others by filing vandalism attempts, however he often rudel criticizes authors of several articles, giving them "constructive" criticism, but when one asks questions about his behavior, he responds by reporting them on this page. Apparently, he can dish out what he can't take. Please block him for several days. Do not block Gabrielsimon! He erased his vandalism warning, and tried to frame me for it!


if anyone actually reads my talk page, i fail to see any vengefull things in there, nor in the logs of deleted things. As for him, if hed have bothered to READ anything ive been posting hed never havemade this accusation.

go ahead, read the logs for yourself. ive shown no hatred, no malice at all. and yet just a moment ago, he deleted my own self defence, if it should happen again, please revert it to its exiting state, i will not be called things without at least some defence. Gabrielsimon 03:21, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

and nw hes claiming to have offerd a truce, but if you look at my talk page, and that of the other user hes talking aboutm you (and i) have ( or will) find no evidance to support this, even in deleted logs. i grow weary of his head games. i really do. Gabrielsimon 03:43, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I never offered a truce, as I have done nothing that would warrant making a truce. The vandal he has been working with (see User: report below) put a comment on my talk page and this one responded to it as if I wrote it in a feeble attempt to try to come up with something bad to say about my actions. You can see this [[48]] where they conspire to "fail a false report of vandalism" to try to get me into trouble. DreamGuy 04:14, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)

if you noticed, i talked him out of that. do you see the whole picture or do you purposely skew events to your own favour? really, im starting to wonder. Gabrielsimon 04:21, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

so i suppose you can see why i have a problem with tihs supposed dream guy, so claled. i grow weary of his behavoir. and yet i have yet to say anything out of line, no profanity, nothing insukltiung and yet, hes posted my name here. its more and more like the boy who ccried wolf all the time, and in this case, crying vandal. Gabrielsimon 03:48, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I will admit to former misgivings with DreamGuy, and yes, I have vandalized his page in the past. However, I later insisted that we make some type of peace, he only responded by insulting me with words such as "troll" or "juvenille", (which m former actions were), and ater by the letters WAFM, a not-to-secretive attempt in his sneaky way to say "what a f***ing moron. When I inquired why he called me such a name, he responded to this simple question with his "catchphrase" delete vandal. I was a vandal, now is time for a change. And yes I do iunsult him on my user page but he deserves every last word. If this is violating Wikipedia polic, I will move them to another website. I will publicize DreamGuy's actions and macabre allegations to the public as soon as possible. Block him off Wikipedia for an instensive period, to promote the good-faith and well being of our viewers. In addition, in order to attain his revenge, DreamGu resorts to childish methods, such as reverting my worthy articles on La Malinche and others to attain his petty revenge. Do not block User:Gabrielsion, he has only tried to defend the wholesomeness of Wikipedia by confronting DreamGuy. he must be stopped. Remove him from Wikipedia!

  • (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log)
    • Also goes by name of User:Dbraceyrules and admits on that page to vandalism and harassment, though most vandalism is from the IP. Repeated vandalism of my talk page with swear words and insults, blanking of vandalism warnings on his talk page (either erasing them or leaving swearwords directed at others), tried to file a false vandalism report on bottom of this page. Continued harassment, in league with User:Gabrielsimon, as seen on their respective talk pages. He already has erased an earlier vandalism report about his behavior on April 20. Tried erasing this vandalism report as well. DreamGuy 02:30, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • I will admit to former misgivings with DreamGuy, and yes, I have vandalized his page in the past. However, I later insisted that we make some type of peace, he only responded by insulting me with words such as "troll" or "juvenille", (which m former actions were), and ater by the letters WAFM, a not-to-secretive attempt in his sneaky way to say "what a f***ing moron. When I inquired why he called me such a name, he responded to this simple question with his "catchphrase" delete vandal. I was a vandal, now is time for a change. And yes I do iunsult him on my user page but he deserves every last word. If this is violating Wikipedia polic, I will move them to another website. I will publicize DreamGuy's actions and macabre allegations to the public as soon as possible. Block him off Wikipedia for an instensive period, to promote the good-faith and well being of our viewers. In addition, in order to attain his revenge, DreamGu resorts to childish methods, such as reverting my worthy articles on La Malinche and others to attain his petty revenge. Do not block User:Gabrielsion, he has only tried to defend the wholesomeness of Wikipedia by confronting DreamGuy. he must be stopped. Remove him from Wikipedia!

User:Ruy Lopez

Dollpherinc and

  • (talk · contribs)
  • (talk · contribs)
    • Posting vanity and personal attack pages complete with personal information. Blanked a VfD discussion as well. Continued after warning. Obviously one and the same user. - Lucky 6.9 00:27, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • is now vandalizing talk pages. - Lucky 6.9 00:33, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

April 21

They have also been vandalising User:DreamGuy for several days now. TigerShark 22:35, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Edited user page of Megan1967 (talk · contribs) by adding:

 "Votes for Deletion 
 i vote this site should be deleted as it is a pure hoaks no one likes science fiction"

This is the fourth edit this IP has made to this user page today harassing the user.

WCFrancis 20:32, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)


  1. [50] Removed information from foreign cooperation section for no apparent reason, shortly after page was reverted from same deletion by Dingbat.
  2. [51] Reverted page back to stub for no apparent reason.
  3. [52] Appears to egg on vandalism mistakenly attributed to User:DINGBAT "(go Dingbat go!)"

--Loren 19:35, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log)
  • User keeps on placing a personal question/comment in Purple Heart. The question was moved ot the Discussion page and answered, yet the user placed the question back into the body of the article. User has been asked three times on his/her talk page to stop doing this, repsonded by reverting and calling me a "bugger". Is now also in violation of the Three revert rule. -Husnock 17:46, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Blocked for 24 hours. [18:09, 21 Apr 2005 Knowledge Seeker blocked "User:" with an expiry time of 24 hours (vandalism/three-revert rule (repeatedly inserting question to readers into Purple Heart); was warned 3 times)] — Knowledge Seeker 18:14, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[53] Lotsofissues 17:42, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)


  • Chao (talk · contribs)
    • User promises to vandalize a page - taken from the intro page "haha i'm editing a page and vandalizing it and there's nothing you can do about it - u don't know my ip OR my name w00t i feel like a rebel kekeke --Chao 16:57, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)" Lotsofissues 17:35, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This vandal has hit Patriotism 11 times in the last two days. Not very patriotic, I guess. WBardwin 07:40, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)


contribs sample diff

  • Somebody please block this ID for vandalism and impersonation. Radiant_* 07:04, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)

  • User:
    • When I visited Lorena Bobbitt recently, I noticed the Age section had been removed. At first I thought this was just a disagreement on whether an analysis of Lorena Bobbitt's age and birthdate belongs in Wikipedia, but then when I looked at this user's other edit to the article, I discovered that s/he had changed the year Bobbitt was declared legally insane from 1994 to 1897! A vandal indeed! Wiwaxia 06:55, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Unknown User

  • Template:Unkown User
    • The Pope Benedict XVI Page is clean (from what I can tell) but the old page for Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger ( has been vandalised. When i click edit, it takes me to the new Benedict XVI page, which is clean. Until Google and other search engines crawl Wikipedia, they are taking people who search to the old URL, and therefore a vandalised page. PLEASE FIX pkchrisjohnson (talk) 03:37, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Would like to add the User:Unknown User vandalized the Wikipedia article and has uploaded pornographic images. Sjakkalle 08:29, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • Blocked indefinately for pornographic vandalism. I've also deleted the pornographic image. There's also an offensive image of Bush which I'll allow to go through due process.-gadfium 08:57, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
        • Technically not "indefinately", but 10 years is almost the same... Thanks for your help, Gadfium. Sjakkalle 09:15, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • (talk · contribs)
    • User is entertaining self by replacing text of several pages with #REDIRECT Plank. Has been warned. FreplySpang (talk) 03:37, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
        • User is quite persistant and won't take a hint. A ban would be in order. -CasitoTalk 03:45, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • (talk · contributions)
    • Many sporadic page vandalisms over several months. No productive edits. Keep an eye on this one. -- FP 03:23, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)


April 20

  • (talk · contribs)
    • Vandalised San Francisco, Garner, Great, Genius and created Scott J Lewis which has this content: "Auditor extraordinaire. He also fancies himself quite the comedian, amusing his co-workers with crazy antics all day. They laugh to make him feel better, but gosh darn it - he tries.". Also created Internal audit which combines nonsense with lack of NPOV. San Francisco change was adding "as well as a haven for individuals who are interested in the perversion of homosezual intercourze." Class clown gone bad?

WCFrancis 22:05, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Talk page vandalism, suspicious link, impersonating another user. Kappa 20:39, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, orginally used wrong character Kappa
Actually, that's ¸ (talk · contribs). Most likely a reincarnation of Himself! (talk · contribs). I'm switching to an indefinite block. — Knowledge Seeker 21:05, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Pope Benedict XVI

This site is being bombarded at the moment, and could do with a little help. Keep it on your watchlists, --SqueakBox 19:45, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

  • (talk · contribs)
    • Persistent vandal, 'contributions' page reveals unbroken string of vandalisms going back for months. Vandalized internal combustion engines twice in five days. Worse, given to repeated subtle changes in numerical death stats in article Effect of the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake on Norway. Suggest blocking this guy ASAP!!! before he can do more of these hard to find changes, and suggest somebody take the time to go retrace this guy's steps and undo any such vandalism not already caught. Gzuckier 17:51, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • (talk · contribs)
    • User appears to be visiting at least weekly and vandalizing apparently random pages with a mixture of nonsense and scatology. Out of 41 edits almost all are vandalism. There are six warnings on the user talk page. Today's vandalism was a nonsense change to William IV of the United Kingdom. --Theo (Talk) 16:01, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • (talk · contribs)
    • User has visited infrequently for a year - coming occassionally to vandalize a page. He has received three warnings. Today he vandalized the intro page. It'a apparent he is not going to establish himself as a contributer, and he uses a static IP. Please ban him. Lotsofissues 14:37, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Jimbo D. Wales

Jimbo D. Wales (talk · contribs)

  • remarkably widespread vandalism of prominent pages, often adding an image of a sickle and scythe. Labels his contributions as 'rv vandal'... according to his contribs page he's editted 50 articles in 2 minutes Afterwordafter-word 12:00, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Human or bot, it has been blocked indefinately--nixie 13:00, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

User vandalized Pope Benedict XVI's page, replacing Ratzinger with Ratzinghitler several times.

  • Blocked for 24 hours. Mgm|(talk) 09:47, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

User vandalized Raymond Burr and associated talk page. I've reverted twice. Someone else, please? WBardwin 06:29, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Blocked for 24 hours. Antandrus 05:21, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)


  • Cantus (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log)
  • An Admin needs to block this guy immedieatly. He is causing all kinds of hell with the images on Pope Benedict XVI. He is uploading copyrighted images then deleting the copyvio tags when questioned about them. He then goes into legitimate images and states they are copyright violations which is flat out lieing. Block this user please! -Husnock 03:44, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Since being warned about his actions, this User changed another copyright tag [55], deleted a copyvio notice [56], then made a threat on my User Page [57]. -Husnock 03:54, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Now has gone through the entire Benedict XVI article and removed every single image [58] -Husnock 04:10, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC) and User:Vanman2010

Template:Canada_infobox by anon IP and User:Vanman2010 to further Monarchist League of Canada. Put outdated Red Ensign flag in infobox (enormous at first), has put incorrect data in population (I cannot even guess why), has converted numerous links in infobox to monarchist ones--JimWae 04:03, 2005 Apr 20 (UTC) User:JimWae|JimWae]] 03:58, 2005 Apr 20 (UTC)

April 19



  • Pano34 (talk · contribs)
    • Today, this user has made a number of edits to Jerusalem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Israel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). All of these edits have included the removal of valid Arabic, Islamic and Palestinian sections of the articles: for example, the removal of al-Quds as the Arabic name for Jerusalem. This normally would be just POV, but this user is making misleading edit summaries (for example, "remove duplicative statement that is already stated in its own section") to cover these edits. Might be a troll looking for a fight. --Gareth Hughes 19:30, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Sandbox troll

This is one of the weirdest guys I have ever seen. He has some sockpuppets on Wikipedia:

See the Sandbox history for more details

Typical features of this troll include:

  • Strange edit summaries that are quite long
  • Edits nothing but the sandbox
  • User name is strange and often very long
  • Likes to change accounts
  • Does not have a user page, thus his name is "red"

I don't know who this guy is, but he is getting very annoying.

-- Stevey7788 04:00, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • As long as he restrains himself to the Sandbox, I don't see this as a particularly significant issue. Better for him to be exercising his "creative" urges in a location specifically designed for that purpose. Firebug 04:38, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Personally, Issues 1,3,5 are not illegal in Wikipedia, since there are many users with good edits but no user page. Issue 6, the Sandbot usually clears out anything in 12 hours, or just other users just come in and either clean up his/her junk or replace it with new stuff. Issues 2 and 4 might of the main concern, though I mainly wish to point out that some users put down over 100kb of text, like DrZoidberg. We also have concerns of people just editing one page, and what I mainly think is that is causing some concern. Issue 4, with the sockpuppets, is that if things get bad enough, we can put on their page that they are a sockpuppet of X user, though as Stevey points out correctly, this user has many names, thus probably an dynamic IP address. I know the Sandbox is one of the most vandalized pages, but we should tread with caution on this one. Zscout370 16:19, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

April 18

  • (talk · contribs)
    • All edits appear to be vandalism. Replaces articles with a short offensive phrase. Probably associated with Cambridge University. Blocked once already. -- Solipsist 17:18, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)



  1. Chinese spammer. 13:53, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)


  1. Previously blocked user returning to silly vandalism, on Democratic Party (United States), George H. W. Bush, and Russia. RadicalSubversiv E 13:02, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)


  1. Creating multiple nonsense articles and repeatedly removing the {{delete}} header from Christopher Wilken twice. Has been given all the warnings on his talk page. Firebug 05:43, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)


  1. [59] [60] Repeatedly pasting an essay into Mario Lanza, ignoring attempts to incorporate it into article text and link to the article.
  2. [61] Only attempt at discussion is anger-filled accusations of censorship, despite attempt at dialog and warning on article's talk page and his talk page
  3. [62] Continues to paste article


  1. [63] Vandalizing James Bond, asked to stop and kept at it.
  2. [64] Removing Japanese history Crime against humanity

April 17

  • (talk · contribs)
    • Has added 'ratemypoo' links and other such vandalism to the Parkour page over 20 times in the last month. This page seems to be a vandalism target. --Lucien 22:51, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)--Lucien 22:51, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)




Darren2 (talk · contribs) Floating pelican shit on Template:Shortcut. --SPUI (talk) 15:09, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) (talk · contribs) Spams offensive content into articles and user pages. Very stubborn, immediate blocking is the best solution.

  • This diff with its misleading edit summary, is a good case in point. Smoddy (tgeck) 11:45, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

If you continue down the page to April 6, you'll notice another entry for this IP address, meaning that this user won't stop vandalising Wikipedia. Can we get an admin on this quickly?


Minghong (talk · contribs) Keeps deleting content from, and adding irregular information to Comparison of web browser CSS support (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) despite being told not to. A warning from an admin might help the situation. Nicholas 10:21, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) (talk · contribs) Mass vandlizing lots of articles and putting propoganda in the sandbox. Please block him. -- Stevey7788 05:43, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Extremely stubborn and intends to vandalize. Block as soon as possible! -- Stevey7788 05:52, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • After requests to stop by Stevey7788 and me, user has stopped and apologized. I am not blocking him, but please keep an eye on him. — Knowledge Seeker 06:15, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) (talk · contributions)

  • Vandalism to Ariel Sharon (history · watch) among other, returning vandal, suggest a long term ban, as the user just does not seem to get the idea, also considering that all edits from user seem to be vandalism. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 05:48, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

JImbo Wales

  • JImbo Wales (talk · contribs)
    • Over 50 edits in two minutes. I'm surprised that variations on "Jimbo Wales" such as this one have not already been blocked as user names. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 03:28, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Already blocked. From the looks of it, at least 3 admins (including myself) tried to block him at once. – ClockworkSoul 03:29, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • Also goes under User:JIMBO WALES, and has vandalized Clockwork's user page. Might be a reincarnation of Wikipedia is Communism. Zscout370 16:31, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
        • I also think User:JIMBO WALES should be blocked. He vandalized a lot of pages. Impersonating Jimbo Wales is horriable. Howabout1 02:16, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

April 16 (talk · contribs)


  • This is the last straw. Not only is this user up on RfC, another user with no prior history has come out of nowhere to nominate him for administrator status. He will not respond to anything but the most basic concerns despite friendly advice bordering on pleading from not only myself but a number of other users. This latest edit comes from Freddy Got Fingered: There is a scene where Gord wacks the horse's thingy. As he travels the highway, he sees the horse being wacked on and then starts the wacking. His edits are far more disruptive than helpful and I'm beginning to wonder whether or not we're really dealing with a clueless newbie or full-tilt troll. - Lucky 6.9 00:51, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment: While I have no direct evidence, I have some suspicions that the parties responsible for his admin nomination as well as a new user who posted a disparaging comment on SamuraiClinton's talk page are all sockpuppets of his. - Lucky 6.9 06:51, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • I share similar suspicions. Can we get a sockpuppet check on User:SamuraiClinton, User:LevelCheck, User: and User:SuperDude115 please? -- FP 07:54, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
      • LevelCheck/ seems to be a different person, possibly one who felt like trolling SamuraiClinton. The IP resolves to Atlanta, while SamuraiClinton is in Michigan. On the other hand, SuperDude115 seems to either be SamuraiClinton or an impersonator. --SPUI (talk) 08:53, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I'll bet you're right. "SuperDude" has suddenly started in on the VfD page, voting to keep Livonia Mall, a Samurai contribution about a mall in...yup, Michigan. I've voiced that opinion on my own vote to delete as a non-notable, generic mall. Also, note SuperDude's writing style in comparison to SamuraiClinton. Heck, even the user names are similar as being portmanteaus of two proper nouns. - Lucky 6.9 09:09, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • User:SuperDude115 is without question the same user. I'd left word on the SamuraiClinton talk page with an offer to tutor him before stumbling on a SuperDude115 non-article called Impulse buying. I'm not sure whether to withdraw my original offer or not. I'm beginning to think a time-out is definitely warranted. - Lucky 6.9 22:49, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I found this edit on the Adolf Hitler article: [65]. Zzyzx11 | Talk 22:59, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Why does it remind me of this edit: [66] Zzyzx11 | Talk 23:04, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • THAT does it. This idiocy is the icing on the cake for me. He continues to thwart the rules of conduct, he refuses to admit his wrongdoing, he has rejected each and every reasonable offer from a score of other users to end this behavior and now we have...these. No more. It has to end here and now. - Lucky 6.9 02:29, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment: There is now a glimmer of hope here. The latest edit by SuperDude115 is an article called Grand Theftendo. This is not only a legit and fascinating project which is attempting to create an 8-bit NES emulator version of "Grand Theft Auto," the initial entry was an excellent stub. - Lucky 6.9 04:34, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Additional comment: It appears we're dealing not with a troll or vandal but with an autistic individual who means well. He admitted to it on my talk page after I carefully speculated to another user that autism was the possible root of the problem. I'm withdrawing the vandalism charge and I hope to see the RfC wrapped up soon as well. - Lucky 6.9 17:35, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log)
  • Angel12 (talk · contribs)
    • I'm not sure if everyone would consider this vandalism. They are adding links to a semi-relevant website to articles, but the sheer number of them (50 at this IP and 60 at another) and the popup window that appears says "spam" to me.
    • They have already been warned here by Gadfium
    • I say: block them.
    • I would agree. I've reverted a few from the top IP, they are sneaky spam links to an admittedly relevant page, but the pages I checked were invariably copied from another site (I didn't check whether it was copy vio'd, for example was copied to and then spam-linked to Bodhidharma), and the article had less information than wikipedia's. If it was a better link, then we could always bypass the intermediate spam-site. -Wikibob | Talk 02:06, 2005 Apr 20 (UTC)
      • Thanks for the investigation. I've blocked them for 24 hours, just as a gesture, since this is an old IP address.-gadfium 02:18, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Now as User:Angel12, arguing a case on their talk page for putting lots of links to their onelittleangel website. I still don't think this is acceptable, and User:Mel Etitis has also been pointing that out to them, but they're persisting. I think a few more voices on their talk page may help.-gadfium 19:57, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)