Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Goguryeo

Goguryeo[edit]

Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.

To report a problem with the outcome of this case, contact the Mediation Committee.
If additional mediation proceedings are required, a new mediation request should be filed.
These case pages should not be edited, even to correct article content problems. Case pages are not indexed by search engines.

Resolved:

Inactivity; party and issues list not representative of current situation.

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 06:00, March 12 2007 (UTC)

Involved parties[edit]

¹ Filer of request, and attempted mediation prior which was "unsuccessful".

Articles involved[edit]

Goguryeo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Balhae (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Northeast Project of the Chinese Academy of Social Science (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:[edit]

WP:RFC ([1])
Protection to force parties to discuss [2], [3] -- which failed to create a consensus (see Talk:Goguryeo).

Issues to be mediated[edit]

Whether Goguryeo is currently NPOV and if not, how it should be fixed -- specifically, whether addressing the issue in Northeast Project of the Chinese Academy of Social Science is sufficient
Whether Balhae is currently NPOV and if not, how it should be fixed (both articles have been subject to lengthy revert/edit wars prior to current full protection statuses)

Additional issues to be mediated[edit]

None presently. 09:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Parties' agreement to mediate[edit]

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Agree Nlu (talk) 06:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Cydevil 06:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Endroit 18:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Good friend100 00:31, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree WangKon936 03:43, 13 March 2007 (UTC) (Uh, so what's next?)[reply]
Agree Rexdale
Agree cyanocyte
Agree Easternknight Jegal 22:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Yeahsoo 22:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Etimesoy 23:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree CronusXT 15:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Ksyrie 19:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Assault11 19:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Wikimachine 23:21, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Whlee 17:49, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Komdori 16:35, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree --Jiejunkong 15:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Visviva 15:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree JakeLM 18:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Wiki Pokemon 18:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]

Accepted

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[omg plz]} 07:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Mediation Committee is currently discussing and considering appropriate mediators for this case. Daniel Bryant 05:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As a result of discussion by the Committee on personnel in this case, the two Members of the Committee, Armedblowfish (talk) and Daniel.Bryant (talk), will be mediating this case together. Organisational issues will be sorted out within the next twenty-four hours by Armedblowfish, so that mediation can begin. Please bear with us until this time.

For the Mediation Committee, Daniel Bryant 09:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To the involved parties: We strongly recommend private mediation. To request an account on the private Mediation Wiki, please click on the mail link in my signature. Include "Goguryeo" somewhere in the subject, e.g. "Private wiki account request for Goguryeo mediation". If you do not have email enabled on your account and are unable to use the mail link, please click on my username in my signature and let me know on my talk page. I will post this message elsewhere. Thanks, Armed Blowfish (mail) 18:36, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should also read the Mediation Committee policy on confidentiality. Thanks, Armed Blowfish (mail) 19:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On hold per discussion at MedComWiki. Parties, please see the message there (in regards to possibly reopening this case when the block of parties that are currently busy, return), if further dispute resolution is required.

For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 05:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Closed per this and this.

For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 07:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.