Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/VBulletin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Involved parties[edit]

Articles involved[edit]

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:[edit]

  • Discussion was attempted on the Talk page for the article. All involved in this dispute participated.
  • Help has been asked in WP:EL, which brought "third party" editors into the discussion.

Issues to be mediated[edit]

  • External links section

Additional issues to be mediated[edit]

  • None

Parties' agreement to mediate[edit]

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
  1. Agree. Havok (T/C/e/c) 17:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

2. Agree Joeychgo 08:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

3. Agree - Brandon

4. Agree Scotsmist 01:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]

Accepted case

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon[omg plz] 00:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

I'll take this case. ^demon[omg plz] 04:24, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

It seems Joeychgo can no wait[edit]

seems he has decided to add the links regardless of this going to mediation claiming it has went stale.Scotsmist 01:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

What went wrong here is nothing to do with parties bing uninterested or it going stale, the person assigned to mediate didn't! We have been left waiting until joeychgo stuck the boot in and decided to spam the external links again. I see I got another spam email from your site myself joey, yum yum. Scotsmist 02:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)