Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrator instructions .

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G5 or G11 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases


TPM Inc[edit]

Hello, I am having trouble understanding the exact reason why this page was tagged for deletion and eventually deleted even after I edited the text. I do not work at this company, have carefully researched Wikipedia posting rules before doing it, and I truly don't think the text was promotional. I had included only 1 link to the website of the company (the link led to homepage and was in infobox and external links, no link in text), but would still remove it without an issue if that was the reason. I had also researched similar topics on Wikipedia and tried to keep the style consistent to them. Moreover, I have specifically refrained myself from taking ANY kind of information from the company website or blog. All of the information I included, without exceptions, were sourced from external sources, not related to the company. So, apart from the default paragraphs of the possible reasons why the page was deleted, can you please indicate the exact parts of the text that looked promotional to you or the exact reasons why the page didn't deserve to be saved. Please understand where I come from, at this point I still don't understand how I could have possibly improved the text and it is hard to progress and make other edits/create other pages not knowing why the previous one got deleted. I would really appreciate the help, thank you. Poster11 (talk) 21:14, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

  • The deletion clearly states it and it followed our main policy WP:What Wikipedia is not, however, I will note that anything still suggestive of a business profile will be deleted; focusing only with the basics and also major independent news is what helps in articles here. SwisterTwister talk 22:10, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
  • As I recall the article was for a local chain of print shops. The article relied heavily on claims of WP:INHERITed notability from its client base rather than any claims of notability of its own. To be fair, the first admin to respond declined the CSD. It was only because Poster11 restored the CSD that the article was in consideration for deletion. If the article is restored, and there are no verifiable claims of notability I will take it to AfD. Cabayi (talk) 21:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • The reason it looked promotional was the use of marketing style words, such as prestigeous, exclusive, awards, expertise, recognized. If you didn't retore the delete tags yourself it mya have survived till this day. The way ahead is to ask User talk:Deb to restore it for you. You can tell her that you added the delete tags by mistake. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Hey everyone, I want to say thank you for all of you replying, this really did clear up things for me. I don't think I will ask to restore the tag, I might just rework the information, make the necessary fixes, and then maybe try again. With these comments, I don't think the previous text will work even if I edit it. Thank you again. Poster11 (talk) 13:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Charanjeet Singh Sondhi[edit]

this is page about a prominent singer of India. He has released more than 15 pop and devotional album under various companies like T-Series, Venus etc. —Iconicmj11 (talk) 14:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note this request was made by a block-evading sockpuppet account. --Yamla (talk) 15:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Wi-SUN[edit]

I, Rbienert, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rbienert (talk) 15:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

We would like to continue editing the article to address the comments —Rbienert (talk) 15:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
"We"? Are you confessing to a shared account? Cabayi (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If someone else wants to contribute to the article, they must register their own account. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Dr._Crawford[edit]

I put in the necessary criteria for each of the things and every time the pot would mark it again, I would add more in. I don't see the reason why it was deleted. —Schwiiz (talk) 20:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done We do not accept non free images of living people, as they are replacable by a newly taken photo. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Sex in the Title[edit]

I, Nitareeny, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nitareeny (talk) 03:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

would like to continue to work on it and then click the "Save page" button below —Nitareeny (talk) 03:51, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Charanjeet Singh Sondhi[edit]

actually thispage is about a singer who has released many albums from various big companies like T-Series, venus —2405:204:E18A:516E:0:0:D14:38AC (talk) 04:03, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Jim Carrington[edit]

This author has new books about to be published in Cambridge University Press's Cambridge Reading Adventures, a worldwide reading scheme , and he has produced a series on social skills for autistic-spectrum students for LDA Learning. http://www.ldalearning.com/products.aspx?search=1&style=0&kw=robot

Template:Jim Carrington The subject has further forthcoming titles in the CUP worldwide reading scheme Cambridge Reading Adventures. Leading special educational publisher LDA has commissioned a series of social skills books from Jim Carrington for use with autistic-spectrum students. http://www.ldalearning.com/products.aspx?search=1&style=0&kw=robot

ZEBRONICS[edit]

User@Exemplo347 has made mutiple edits in page and also caused the deletion by appealing for speedy deletion under act G11. Also the article has no intend of promotion nor any other, also there is no proof for spamming activity.

  • Note to reviewing Admin - please see [1] - article protected from creation. New version used All Caps title to bypass this. Exemplo347 (talk) 12:14, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. It was clearly promotional, with numerous links to product pages and citations to public-relations press releases. DO NOT attempt to bypass the community process here by re-creating the article under alternative names. If you feel the article was improperly deleted, take it up with the deleting administrator, and if they decline to restore, take your case to WP:DRV. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Templeton University[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Edmund777 (talk) 12:29, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done as it was promtional (and possibly a copyright infringement). If you are connected with this institution, it is better to let someone else write about it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:05, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NOMBREX[edit]

I, G8gon, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. G8gon (talk) 13:27, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:00, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Thoth: Software for Data Visualization and Statistics[edit]

Please restore the page as I intend to edit it and make it encyclopedic. —CorniceBowlSkier (talk) 19:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. Start over. In draft space, or in your sandbox, and submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Queen Cora[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Cgspeed1 (talk) 22:05, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

@Cgspeed1: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Request for undelection of Victor Ike[edit]

Hello, I've been trying to send a message to Northamerica1000, but when i click on "Talk back" or {{You've got mail}} on his page, it directs me to a different page. I wrote here some weeks ago, about the delection of Victor Ike Article and did'nt get no response, which i think was'nt faire. I also wrote to John of Reading & Κσυπ Cyp about the delection of the article i'm still working on and they told me that it was Northamerica1000 that delected it. Please can you explain your deletion of that article "Victor Ike"? It was a soft redirect and was created using the appropriate template for such. I'm still working on it and It did not qualify for a speedy or any other deletion since we having pages like that is very normal. I would appreciate if you can restore it. Best Regards, Tracy

X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Ike, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
Did you read the deletion discussion?
Just write a note on the administrator's talk page, without trying to use templates. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Jon Smith[edit]

the article was fully referenced. As the deleting admin noted, the author is an author of some notable works and therefore is notable by connection to those works. That the author doesn't seek publicity personally shouldn't detract from the notability of their works and their author. —— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanseng (talkcontribs) 16:51, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

@Sanseng: Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.
...and, proposed for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Smith. An author doesn't become notable by virtue of having written some books that got some publicity. See WP:NAUTHOR and WP:NOTINHERITED. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Barbara Devlin[edit]

I, Caliki, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Caliki (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

@Caliki: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Rubrik[edit]

The content (including recognitions) was all well-cited, as was mentioned by others who reviewed it. So, it's inaccurate to claim it was a promotional page. In addition, there are many startups listed on Wikipedia, many of which are lesser-known than Rubrik. —LaLoo (talk) 20:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubrik, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Hut 8.5 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:James MacDonald ‎[edit]

I want to continue editing it for publishing. I took some time away and I didn't realize there was a timeline. Thank you —TeepTeep (talk) 21:45, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Women’s League for Conservative Judaism ([edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 108.24.148.165 (talk) 01:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Matt Tarrant[edit]

I, 114.198.126.142, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 114.198.126.142 (talk) 03:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Aileen Cassinetto[edit]

Accidentally deleted —Ugatdos (talk) 12:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Roar[edit]

{{subst:refund|1= Low Roar |2= The reason why Low Roar was merged with Audrye Sessions was because of insufficient notability back then. However, Low Roar is releasing a third album, and according to Spotify has 185,000+ monthly listeners. I don't see how that is insufficient notability, considering an artist like Azure Ray only has 39,000+ monthly listeners. Low Roar is a separate entity which is gaining a considerable fanbase, while Audrye Sessions is a thing of the past (534 monthly listeners last I checked). Surely, Audrye Sessions should not have their article deleted since they did enjoy a period of notability, but Low Roar should also have their own page since they have reached a sizable amount of followers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edmondduong (talkcontribs) 18:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Since it did not get deleted, we don't have to restore. Instead you can see previous version at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Low_Roar&oldid=619543177 and edit from there. Though I have seen some controversial editing recently, so a discussion on the talk page would be wise. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Defance, Ohio (band)[edit]

Meets the criteria in 'Wikipedia:Notability (music) Criteria for musicians and ensembles' numbers match up with numbers in notability guide.

1. Defiance, Ohio has three full length albums and an EP released on No Idea Records, an EP on Plan-It-X Records, and Anti-Creative Records and several other releases on less notable lables. Their only self release was their fist album and demo.

4. They've had several international tours of the USA, Canada, Australia, Europe and Iceland. Here's a few announcements I found on google. https://www.punknews.org/article/48584/tours-defiance-ohio-spoonboy-east-coast

https://www.punknews.org/article/42909/tours-defiance-ohio-nana-grizol-your-heart-breaks-toby-foster https://www.punknews.org/article/32477/defiance-ohio-new-relese-tour-dates http://thepunksite.com/news/defiance-ohio-announces-tour-in-support-of-new-full-length/

7. Defiance, Ohio was one of the largest bands in the wave of folk punk in the mid/late 00's and had a large influence in the Bloomington punk scene. —Evanw (talk) 22:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Micropolis (company)[edit]

The article was PRODed last month stating it was about a non-notable topic and completely unreferenced. While I don't know if that article contained any valuable information (already), the topic (a former company in the disk drive and operating system business) is clearly notable and needs to be covered by us for historic reasons. Being unreferenced is not normally a valid reason for deletion if notability is given and the article meets at least stub-class. Therefore I request undeletion. —Matthiaspaul (talk) 13:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Priam Corporation[edit]

The article was PRODed last month stating it was about a non-notable topic and completely unreferenced. While I don't know if that article contained any valuable information, the topic (a former company in the disk drive business and IIRC also of disk related software or operating systems) is notable and needs to be covered by us for historic reasons. Being unreferenced is not normally a valid reason for deletion if notability is given and the article meets at least stub-class. Therefore I request undeletion —Matthiaspaul (talk) 14:39, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Kalok[edit]

Yet another article PRODed last month by the same nominator stating it would be about a non-notable topic and unreferenced. I don't know if that article contained any valuable information (already), but the topic (another former disk drive vendor) is notable enough to have some entry in order to better cover the history of micro-computing. Again, being unreferenced is not a valid reason in itself for deletion unless the article doesn't meet at least stub-class or would be about a non-notable topic. Therefore I request undeletion. —Matthiaspaul (talk) 14:46, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:AlternaScript[edit]

I, AmILab, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AmILab (talk) 14:51, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:40, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

4Story[edit]

The article was deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7. Please userfy it because I want to improve it. —Gheoan (talk) 01:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

In this case you should ask the deleting admin user talk:DGG as it was deleted with A7, no claim of importance for a web content. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpl_(company)[edit]

The article was initially put up by someone who said they'd help. Wasn't aware that he ran a mass advertising farm. All the information in the page are sourced from reputed Indian and international news sites. —Roshansam (talk) 03:02, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done Although this was deleted by a PROD, the creation by a banned user speedy delete criterion still applies. So if I restored it, I would have to delete it again immediately. If you are not a reincarnation of a banned user you can recreate the page. You can still appeal this with User:Premeditated Chaos or using WP:DRV though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:45, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Clinton_Keith[edit]

I, 2600:1011:B103:10C:C4A3:B1DF:143D:BF7A, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2600:1011:B103:10C:C4A3:B1DF:143D:BF7A (talk) 04:27, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Although the page was nominated for deletion hastily, it was an A7 not a G13 delete. In other words there was no claim of importance and little content. What was there started "Clinton Keith is a former video game developer and a Certified Scrum Trainer and agile coach" by Jouster66. I suggest that you look for sources of information first that can show WP:Notability. If they exist you can start again at Draft:Clinton Keith where you will have more time to gewt the page ready. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:19, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  • There looks to have been more content at Draft:Clinton Keith, so it might be worthwhile to restore that if they return to this page. I'll ping Jouster66 since this was likely him posting. It looks like there was an attempt to remove the G13 tag at the draft article, but it was restored. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:41, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Samuel Ogden Edison, Jr[edit]

I, Vansh Bhardwaj, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NeonLightsDiscoDude 05:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)


I would like to use more articles to write more text. I was away at the time of deletion. —NeonLightsDiscoDude 05:12, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hi User:Vansh Bhardwaj, can you please make a link to your user talk page in your signature to help us to talk to you? The page is actually at Draft:Samuel Ogden Edison, Jr. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:52, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

GNSS FATIMA[edit]

Article recently deleted per authors request, while I remember reading it as informative. There are also several internal links pointing to it. The article possibly warrants expansion to discuss the general concept of a Martian satellite navigation system, including other sources and other concepts. —— JFG talk 08:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

dont bite the newbies![edit]

Who is deleting sandboxs. This seems carazy. Victuallers (talk) 15:56, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Don't host spam! "...the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service." We also delete attack pages, copyvios, etc. And this really should be on the talk page. --NeilN talk to me 16:02, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Nick Z Marino[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Nickzmarino (talk) 18:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Note that Wikipedia articles have to be based on facts already published, not on what you know. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Environmental Irrigation[edit]

I, 101.165.7.220, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 101.165.7.220 (talk) 00:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:06, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Niv Horesh[edit]

entry has existed for several years and is linking with an important and growing body of work by the author —31.210.180.117 (talk) 08:39, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

ANISH KUSHWAHA[edit]

Enter your reasoning here it doesn't look good I will put another one and then click the "Save page" button below —Anishkushwaha (talk) 13:51, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done In the case of User:Anishkushwaha, Wikipedia is not a social networking site. There are other web siteslike Facebook or LinkedIn suited for this purpose. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:23, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:ZAxploitation[edit]

I, S.A.MovieManiac, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. S.A.MovieManiac (talk) 14:25, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jaroslav Čejka[edit]

I, Yak~cswiki, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Yak~cswiki (talk) 17:59, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Zero Point Module[edit]

Just a request for information at this time: what deleted or non-existent page did it redirect to? — Godsy (TALKCONT) 22:10, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Adhitia Sofyan[edit]

Enter The page was deleted due to claims on no existence of notability, where there is some. —Jordi Rossell (talk) 02:36, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Mohammed Amin Kholwadia[edit]

I, Officedepot00, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Officedepot00 (talk) 04:28, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Kishva Ambigapathy[edit]

This is a page being administered by the Royal Commonwealth Society on the elected youth Chairperson of the worlds largest and most diverse organisation, Commonwealth Youth Council. The data is in process of uploading and especially after his numerous involvement and awards in the Commonwealth. We are hoping that we can put back up this page. thanks. and then click the "Save page" button below —Rcsyouthmalaysia (talk) 08:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Dr Jayanti Prasad Nautiyal[edit]

This page was deleted for want of Third party proof. Now the proof is submitted as under "Save page" button below —Aajpn (talk) 09:58, 28 March 2017 (UTC) Awards/Certifications:

http://www.limcabookofrecords.in/record-detail.aspx?rid=170 http://www.iibf.org.in/iib_cpdsuccessfullcan.asp

References Hindi wikipedia http://napshindi.blogspot.in/2015/10/drjayanti-prasad-nautiyal.html

Books/Articles written: http://www.amazon.in/Hindi-Pratinidhi-Kahaniyan-Taatvik-Vivechan/dp/8188118982/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1485857952&sr=1-1 https://www.sapnaonline.com/shop/Author/jayanti-prasad-nautiyal https://www.flipkart.com/sahitya-vivechan/p/itmdf88j4dkp34jp http://www.hindibook.com/index.php?p=sr&Uc=HB-22604 http://jainbookagency.com/booksearch.aspx?aname=Jayanti%20Prasad%20Nautiyal http://14.139.122.36/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=10839 http://rajbhasha.nic.in/sites/default/files/corp-nautiyal.pdf http://nationallibrary.gov.in/showdetails.php?id=546818 http://www.sanskritiuk.com/hindi_language.php http://www.amanprakashan.com/catelogue14.php http://kgpbooks.com/author/497


News Clippings: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Hindi-topples-Mandarin-as-widely-spoken-language/articleshow/46078856.cms http://www.thehindu.com/2005/03/06/stories/2005030610530300.htm http://www.abhivyakti-hindi.org/snibandh/hindi_diwas/hindiphirpahlesthanper.htm


Key Note addresses at Universities: http://cutn.ac.in/department-of-hindi/eminent-scholar-visitors/ http://www.milagrescathedralkallianpur.com/news_view.php?id=97

(Non-administrator comment) FTR: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jayanti Prasad Nautiyal. Various WP articles have been spammed with the person's name, website, and/or fringe linguistic theories over the past few years. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotion. --bonadea contributions talk 10:03, 28 March 2017 (UTC)