Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrator instructions

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts:

Page undelete requested.Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases


Contents

'

Draft:Alice Bowman[edit]

I, Nealmcb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ★NealMcB★ (talk) 15:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

I also wish such pages wouldn't be deleted so quickly after a warning about this surprising policy was sent out. That makes it harder to figure out what is going on and seems to waste everyone's time. ★NealMcB★ (talk) 17:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment @Nealmcb: you were warned January 4 that deletion was going to happen in a month because it hadn't been touched in over 5 months. Then it was actually deleted on February 6 a full month later. Considering most deletion discussions last 7 days I think 1 month is not quick at all. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 00:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Oh dear - yes - wow. I'm very surprised I missed that warning a month ago! Thank you for the links to clarify the situation. ★NealMcB★ (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the restore! ★NealMcB★ (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Animated dreams[edit]

Ticket:2015110610012071 licenses the content (media and text) of http://www.anima.ee/ under CC-BY-SA-4.0 - can an admin please check whether anything can be salvaged? -Storkk (talk) 16:51, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done The text is basically an advertisement. It would be better to rewrite it in a non promotional style. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks, Graeme. I've informed the ticket submitter. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 11:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Dizanji i nje kerkimi[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -MigenaM (talk) 21:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done MigenaM: This looks to be an article about design as it applies to research, which is already at Wikipedia more or less at design. Also, the article is in Albanian and articles on the English Wikipedia must be in English. There is an Albanian Wikipedia that has that topic, so I'd recommend improving the article there. If you want, we can e-mail you a copy of the article, but it cannot be on the English Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

User:Logan Lynn Roberts[edit]

I made minor updates to my userpage & then before I could even blink the page was flagged & completely deleted even tho I was in the process of working to make changes to rectify the complaints. I've had my userpage since 2013 & I've made edits to articles where I had value to add, I'd like a chance to get the source code back from the old page so I could at least use the hours of work I put in as a base for a new user page. This all happened instantly please help, my intentions were never bad. Thank you. -Logan Lynn Roberts 13:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC) Logan Lynn Roberts 13:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done Sorry, but the whole userpage was an advertisement for yourself, links to diverse pages included. Please read what wikipedia is not. Lectonar (talk) 13:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
@Logan Lynn Roberts: You should also familiarize yourself with the Wikipedia:User pages policy. There's nothing in your deleted user page that could be used as a basis for a new one and be compliant with Wikipedia policies. Start over, please. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Frank D. Padgett[edit]

I, 98.155.101.29, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 98.155.101.29 (talk) 19:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - all that was deleted was a draft page. The actual article Frank D. Padgett has not been deleted, and you are welcome to improve it. JohnCD (talk) 20:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Raphael Schumacher[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Feran (talk) 19:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

@Feran: X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raphael Schumacher, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Kusma (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 20:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Beta Movement (film festival)[edit]

Pranay28 (talk) 19:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Solar Wind Surfboard Propulsion[edit]

I, Jfields026, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jfields026 (talk) 01:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Raphael Schumacher (2)[edit]

This page may represent a person recently deceased who is current in world news. https://www.facebook.com/topic/Raphael-Schumacher/113396132004585?source=whfrt&position=1&trqid=6248351043447493626 -118.208.170.170 (talk) 01:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raphael Schumacher, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Kusma (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Although the AFD was speeedily closed, I don't see any other outcome from a normal close. The useful content is in List of entertainers who died during a performance though. Graeme Bartlett (talk)

Raphael Schumacher (3)[edit]

The page seems to have been deleted for no reason -2A01:388:231:150:0:0:1:92 (talk) 03:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done – No reason? See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raphael Schumacher, linked in the deletion summary, or the section above this one. — Earwig talk 05:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Bhumi Pednekar[edit]

Pednekar is a notable person in the Hindi Film Industry with two confirmed films (one released and one in production) and multiple awards. -Monica982 (talk) 05:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. @Monica982: regardless of Pednekar's notability, the article cannot be restored for two reasons:
  • The most recent version was a copyright violation, and we will absolutely not restore such an article.
  • This page is for requesting uncontroversial restorations. Before the copyvio version, the article was previously deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhumi Pednekar. Because of that, it cannot be restored by request on this page. You must ask the deleting administrator Coffee to reconsider, and if the administrator declines to restore it, then your next step is to present your case at Wikipedia:Deletion review.
Thanks for your understanding. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

User:Jenny Death/sandbox[edit]

I request that my page be undeleted. I was planning to continue working on some tables I had there. Jenny Death (talk) 06:29, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done @Jenny Death: I've restored it since I do see that you have done some work on music related lists, but I have to warn you: I'm mildly concerned that creating a soundtrack list for all of the music in Saints Row might be considered a bit WP:INDISCRIMINATE since it's not a major feature of the game like it is for something like Rock Band. No reason you can't continue to work on this, but you'll likely need to provide some sourcing to justify a list page for the songs. (An example of a good list page can be seen at 2007 in downloadable songs for the Rock Band series.) Not all soundtracks and lists really warrant inclusion on Wikipedia. If this isn't being done with the intent to make an article page, please be aware that Wikipedia is not a WP:WEBHOST. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

User:Sarahgiggle/sandbox[edit]

I, Sarahgiggle, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sarahgiggle (talk) 20:16, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

After the Ball (Tolstoy)[edit]

We are in the process of constructing this page for a class assignment at Dartmouth College (which has been approved by Wikipedia editors) and recently posted our proposed list of sources. The "After the Ball (Tolstoy)" page was deleted, and we are not sure why. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sy dart2016 (talkcontribs) 21:41, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done It was deleted because the creator, Sy dart2016, blanked the page. We take that as a sign that it was unwanted. However I will restore it back to a version with text. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
@Sy dart2016: I have also moved it to Draft:After the Ball (Tolstoy) as it is not currently ready for the main space in any manner as it is only a list with no context. Feel free to work on it there and submit it for review when it's ready.McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 01:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ilgvars Zalans[edit]

I, Katya.pogrebnaya, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Katya.pogrebnaya (talk) 09:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

@Katya.pogrebnaya: X mark.svg Not done, because what was deleted was only the draft. The actual article at Ilgvars Zalāns has not been deleted, and you are welcome to improve it. JohnCD (talk) 11:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Institute of Neo Education (iNED)[edit]

I, Tafeax, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tafeax (talk) 13:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Smart Survey[edit]

I, Smartline55, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Smartline55 (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Have you read our guidance on WP:COI and our general notability guideline? Guy (Help!) 15:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Smart Survey Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Rosa Maria Palomino[edit]

I, Logicmaker103, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Logicmaker103 (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

@Logicmaker103: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
@JohnCD:: Thank you. I understand the requirements and will work on the revision. The previous restore was re-deleted so fast I couldn't make any edits.
That was my fault - I failed to remove the deletion tag after restoring it, so it went straight back into the speedy-deletion queue. I have done it right his time! JohnCD (talk) 22:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

The Unlucky 31[edit]

I forgot to save it as a draft, and accidentally published it without any references, notability, etc. -Tjsmith9656 (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

@Tjsmith9656: Yes check.svg Done - I have restored the page to User:Tjsmith9656/The Unlucky 31 where you can work on it; but there are two important things to say:
  • It seems from your username and the name of the company's website that you are connected with it. In that case, you should read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. You will see that you should not submit an article directly, but may submit a draft for review by an uninvolved user. Note also that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use ("Paid contributions without disclosure" under section 4), and in some jurisdictions by laws against covert advertising, to disclose your interest in any edits where you have a COI.
  • Wikipedia's inclusion criterion, called Wikipedia:Notability, is quite demanding: it looks for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Youtube, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also Wikipedia:Notability (summary). It seems to me wildly improbable that a shop founded two days ago can yet have acquired the independent comment necessary for notability, and I urge you to think hard about this and not to waste your time trying to get an article accepted.
I am sorry to be discouraging but Wikipedia is not here to help publicise start-ups. JohnCD (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Pridwin Preparatory School[edit]

I, Nasaspaceman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nasaspaceman (talk) 11:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

@Nasaspaceman: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Pridwin Preparatory School. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia..
Please check out Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Your first article and note the need for independent references. Also, short though it is, this reads like a prospectus and is unacceptably promotional. An encyclopedia article is not a place for the school to tell the world about itself, in the first person ("We strive... "), and should not contain marketing fluff like "positive learning experience... unique and multifaceted potential... " Read WP:PEACOCK. You should write in a neutral tone, no opinions or glowing adjectives, just plain facts cited to reliable sources. If you are connected to the school, read WP:PSCOI and note that you are required to declare your interest. JohnCD (talk) 20:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Emily Nagle (2)[edit]

I, Causeart, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Causeart (talk) 14:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

@Causeart: Yes check.svg Done - the draft was restored on 4 Feb in response to your earlier request higher up this page. To repeat what was said there: please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Logos of the digital channels of the NPO[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -XPanettaa (talk) 17:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC) These nine images was deleted by Fastily in June 2011 and one image was deleted by Courcelles in May 2011 under F5. I would like to request these pages be restored so I can license them under a free license or in the public domain and put it into articles, because these logos are simple and consists of text, number and simple geometric shape. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.

If you do indeed own the rights and can therefore release them, you should not be editing the articles, per WP:COI. Guy (Help!) 17:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
I already do indeed own the rights and can therefore release them under a free license or in the public domain. And also, I'm not just editing the articles, per WP:COI. So, are you the one who can restore deleted images? XPanettaa (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2016
If that is the case you should be going through OTRS. We cannot take your word for it. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • I am starting to restore these as they fall into the pd-textlogo category. I do not know if Netherlands copyright is applicable, but they look too simple for copyright in the USA. Whether they are useful on Wikipedia is a different question. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/McKenzie Mack[edit]

Lisawebisode (talk) 18:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

@Lisawebisode: Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. This was undeleted in April 2015 after this request when you said it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it, and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise.
Please also note the comment made last time: "this proposed article needs a lot of work. It is right now a panegyric. It sounds like it was written by a PR department trying to convince the reader of the virtue of their client." JohnCD (talk) 22:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:GWAVA software[edit]

I, El Jefe Inbound, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Have new references I can add. Not sure why it isn't added to main wikipedia. plenty of references and similar to other companies already in wiki -El Jefe Inbound 19:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

@El Jefe Inbound: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Rosa Maria Palomino (2)[edit]

I, Logicmaker103, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Logicmaker103 (talk) 21:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

@Liz: You deleted a page that was literally just restored. Mind undoing it and removing the G13 tag? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
@Liz: - that was my fault, I forgot to remove the db tag after restoring it. JohnCD (talk) 22:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
@Logicmaker103: Yes check.svg Done - properly this time, sorry about that! As an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
That has happened to me several times, JohnCD, when I restore an article from deletion. I need to remember to uncheck the latest edit that places a CSD tag on the page. Liz Read! Talk! 22:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
But User:Liz, it is better to restore all revisions and then edit off the csd request, otherwise the page appears to be unedited for over 6 months and eligible again for g13 deletion immediately. Also history of g13's is then more obvious! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Well, because I usually forget and restore all of the edits in an article's history, I do just end up deleting the CSD tag. Liz Read! Talk! 02:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Justinian Jampol[edit]

I, Hayleybird, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hayleybird (talk) 23:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

I would like to edit the submission to address the concerns raised over notability -Hayleybird (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Kate Petley[edit]

I, Mnelsonp, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mnelsonp (talk) 01:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Hi @Mnelsonp: I restored this back in last July and no edits at all were done on the page. What do you plan to do this time? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Neoperl Group[edit]

I, Tulpenfeld, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tulpenfeld (talk) 02:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 02:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Have been working on the article to address its weaknesses and would like to resubmit for review -Tulpenfeld (talk) 02:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

That sounds very general, but please tell us one specific thing you will change. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

One of the criticisms was that the article read like an advertisement, and that the language was not objective. Thus, I have removed words such as "innovative". I have removed unsourced claims and added external sources where available. Tulpenfeld (talk) 02:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Geschiedenis 24 logo.png[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -XPanettaa (talk) 18:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I almost forgot. This image was also deleted by Fastily in June 2011 under F5 and should also be restored as it falls into the PD-textlogo category, because this logo is also simple and it also consists of text, number and simple geometric shape. However, I found six images that was deleted. One image was deleted for this reason: 23:16, 31 May 2008 Nv8200pa (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Ziggo Logo.png (Remove image per WP:IFD), one image for this reason: 18:13, 7 December 2014 Ronhjones (talk | contribs) deleted page File:CAZ! logo.svg (File deleted: F5: Unused non-free media file for more than 7 days (TW)), one image for this reason: 01:51, 20 April 2011 Orphaned image deletion bot (talk | contribs) deleted page File:NPS Logo.svg (Unused non-free media (bot)), one image for this reason: 20:07, 13 September 2012 Explicit (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Z@ppelin logo 2009.svg (File deleted: F5: Unused non-free media file for more than 7 days (TW)), one image for this reason: 00:01, 6 June 2012 Explicit (talk | contribs) deleted page File:SURFnet logo.svg (Deleted because "F5: Unused non-free media file for more than 7 days". (TW)), and one image for this reason: 00:09, 19 February 2014 Mark Arsten (talk | contribs) deleted page File:NPO logo.svg (File deleted: F5: Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files unused in articles for more than one week (TW)). I'm not sure that these three image should be release under a free license or in the public domain but maybe I'll do it anyway. I would like to request these pages be restored so I can license them under a free license or in the public domain. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. XPanettaa (talk) 18:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Z@ppelin logo 2009.svg is too complex to be pd-simple, so what do you want to do with that? I am also looking at the others. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Also I would count the CAZ, NPS and Ziggo as complex enough for copyright. So either you can say that you want to use these four under fair use, or if you do own the copyright to the logos then there needs to be proof. If you are working for a Netherlands broadcaster, (or an artwork company) you can edit your user page to say who you work for under the WP:COI rules. WP:PERMIT describes a method where you can send an email to show ownership. I have restored the others. So partly Yes check.svg Done. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Arteezy[edit]

inappropriately deleted under WP:A7 -Prisencolin (talk) 18:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

@Prisencolin: This is not the place to challenge articles deleted as A7- try contacting the deleting admin instead. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
For reference, the deleting admin appears to have been @Y:. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done the page claimed that he was one of the best players in the world, which sounds like a claim of importance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stacy Sullivan[edit]

I, Spirit2heart, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Spirit2heart (talk) 06:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

@Spirit2heart: Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over two years ago after this request, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. JohnCD (talk) 09:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:FinTP Project[edit]

I, Fintpcontributor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FinTP contributor 15:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

@Fintpcontributor: Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. This was undeleted last April after this request, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. JohnCD (talk) 18:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

monjin[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Dreditor1 (talk) 16:33, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done This appears to be an advertisement. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:GOAL (humanitarian organization)[edit]

I, Cassannerrr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cassannerrr (talk) 17:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Einstein Syndrome[edit]

Article contains multiple reliable sources from Scientific American, a published book source, a published journal response, and an article from the MIT press. -Ylevental (talk) 22:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Recommend rejection. AfD advises no notability and nothing has changed. MIT is not a reliable scientific source in this area and it was a blog anyway. Online, Scientific American is also a blog and also self published, which was the concern in the AfD re Cowell's work. Established as not a notable condition, and I believe it's symptoms/diagnostics were incorporated into the Autistic spectrum as part of the DSM-5 anyway. See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Einstein_syndrome. 203.15.226.132 (talk) 23:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Not true, multiple sources have been added since 2007. Also, a person with Einstein syndrome outgrows autistic symptoms, so it is not the same thing. Ylevental (talk) 23:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
That is not correct and not proven either. There is no non self published coverage as noted in the AfD. This has not changed. Scientific American is self published and therefore not acceptable. No one outgrows autism - that is impossible. Einstein syndrome is not medically valid and therefore does not medically exist. 203.15.226.132 (talk) 00:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
The journal article is non self-published. I wish to wait for an official response. Ylevental (talk) 00:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
It is self published by Darold Treffort. 203.15.226.132 (talk) 00:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Oh the journal. That is not reliable. 203.15.226.132 (talk) 00:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Still waiting for an official response Ylevental (talk) 00:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • X mark.svg Not done (official response) as an earlier version of this was already restored to User:Ema--or/Einstein syndrome. Please edit this to improve the page to acceptability first. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • @Ylevental: also, note that articles deleted at AfD like this will not be restored here. When you believe you have improved the draft to overcome the reasons for deletion (check out WP:No original research: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it.") you should approach the deleting administrator, user Lectonar (talk). Then, if you are not satisfied, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 11:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
I will not undelete; the recreated article had (in essence) the same content as the article that was deleted at AfD. If the draft can not be improved as recommended above, this has to go via DRV ultimately. Lectonar (talk) 11:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Jacob Lasee[edit]

I, Goldenfrog53, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Goldenfrog53 (talk) 03:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Johnny Lynch (producer)[edit]

I wish to edit the page, all content was my own, images was taken by myself, I have taken the other page which was in conflict (wordpress) off line now so there is no conflicting or copy issues. I would like to resubmit but after some other edits which I hope will satisfy Wiki needs. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lynch Johnny (talkcontribs) 10:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Lynch Johnny, you would have to submit a ticket via WP:OTRS that would verify that you own the copyright and that you're giving up the content as fair use. We cannot accept this based on a post on Wikipedia. However something to take into consideration is that the material is also mildly promotional, which is one of the other reasons why we discourage using material taken from elsewhere, as the text you used was written to promote you as a casting agent. That's fine on your own website, but it's not permitted on Wikipedia. I also had to delete your userpage since it was also very, very promotional in tone and was also taken from another site. I have to warn you, it's usually not a good idea to write about something with which you have a conflict of interest. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 12:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so can I have the page back so I can edit please. Am not sure what content you are talking about which is copy though? Its all my own work? I didn't mean to be promotional, just want a Wiki page. I see nearly every actor and producer as one and just want one myself. I have tried for over a year now. have listed over 30 articles in the media and now I have lost the page completely. Is it deleted, can I edit the page. I had my credits which took 8 years to build on another page (Wordpress) and deleted that and now have lost them now forever if I can't get them back. I can probably find them through thousands of emails but will take me years and never get them all back as some was on the phone. I just want a page on Wiki that says am a producer and actor and was asked to send one more reference and everything would be fine. I sent in around 30 and was then asked to send in just a couple that was relevant. This is exasperating, am not tech savvy, its very complicated and now I have lost the only copy of my working history as its in the deletion. Am very anxious as Wiki is a trusted resource and so wanted to put myself on here and even deleted the content on my blog (Wordpress which I know isn't a reference) to do so. Am on Wiki on some of the films I have been in such as the recent Star Wars - The Force Awakens film, Am just a simple actor/producer that wants to be listed on Wiki like all my colleagues. Tell me what to do please, this is really making me quite poorly as have lost all record of my credits which are on my last submission. I want to edit that, take them off and write something thats less promotional but also lists me just as an actor/producer like everyone else that I work alongside in my industry on here. Thank you. Lynch Johnny (talk) 12:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@Lynch Johnny: I have emailed you a copy of the deleted page, so that the information is not lost. More advice soon. JohnCD (talk) 13:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. Just want a Wiki page using the four references I submitted, I have the 30 or so I sent before but chose those 4 of which 1 was accepted last year. Just want a simple page to reflect my standing as a professional person in the TV and Film Industry. Not fussed about all the credits but see actors and producers on WiKI have theres listed. I have no idea what am doing right or wrong. Have tried for over a year, got so close by being asked to submit one more article but submitted 30, asked to choose just a couple and we are at this stage. I feel confused and at a loss of how to move forward. Any advice would be fantastic as am often sent to Wiki advice pages and to be honest that just confuses me more as find it all too hard to understand. Thank you Lynch Johnny (talk) 13:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

We can't restore the copied material without a release as described in WP:DCM, but most of it was the long list of IMDb references, which are not useful. If you want to persist, I suggest you write a new draft at Draft:Johnny Lynch (producer), taking care to make it neutral and non-promotional, link to your IMDb page rather than to all the pages for all the films you worked on, and give any independent references with substantial coverage.
However, I have to say that I fear you are probably wasting your time here. Wikipedia is not a site like LinkedIn or Facebook for people to make pages about themselves (see WP:Autobiography and WP:Conflict of interest). Also, it is quite selective about subjects for articles. The WP:Notability test looks for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", see also WP:Notability (summary). IMDb is not reliable, because people write their own entries and there seems little editorial control. For people in your line of work, the relevant standard is WP:ENTERTAINER, and I'm afraid local-paper interviews about a part as a storm-trooper won't be enough. In the nature of things, behind-the-scenes workers like casting agents don't get the same coverage as the starts, and are unlikely to be notable. The documentary you are working on won't count for much until it is released and gets independent reviews. JohnCD (talk) 14:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

neekunj todi[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Neekunj todi (talk) 11:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC) respected sir / madam this page is not about by my own..... this page belongs to neekunj todi .....so i humbly request you to keep this in page.... thanking you.

  • X mark.svg Not done Neekunj todi, there are several issues here. The first is that you claim that you're not Todi, yet you're editing under his username - something that is a violation of our username guidelines. Also, the page that you've been trying to create doesn't establish how Todi is notable per WP:NBIO, which is a requirement, and it was also extremely promotional. Thirdly, there is no WP:OWNERSHIP of pages on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)a

IPETUMODU[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 197.211.53.8 (talk) 11:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC) Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/THE HISTORY OF IPETUMODU AS WE HAVE IT IN OUR BOOKS. IT IS NOT CURRENTLY EXISTING IN WIKIPEDIA. IPETUMODU IS ONE OF NOTABLE TOWNS IN OSUN STATE OF NIGERIA. HEADQUARTERS OF IFE NORTH LOCAL GOVT.

  • There is already an article on Ipetumodu. What is it that you want undeleted? JohnCD (talk) 12:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Do you want the page to be created on Wikipedia because it has no article here?? Lectonar (talk) 12:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • @197.211.53.8: Please write any responses here, rather than opening new requests. We can't restore anything if we don't know what it is that you want restored! Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 12:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SakitMammadov[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ibrahimovws (talk) 11:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello, in accordance with the rules of Wikipedia, I published a page of a famous artist Sakit Mammedov, but, I received a notice of removal. Please show me that i must to correct. Thank you.

(no title given)[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) OVA (talk) 12:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@Oyeloye:. There is already an article Ipetumodu. Please give the name of the page you want undeleted. Answer below here, don't start another new request. JohnCD (talk) 12:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Hydourite Festival[edit]

Hydourite (talk) 12:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@Hydourite: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Men On The Border[edit]

I, PCMorphy72, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. PCMorphy72 (talk) 12:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@PCMorphy72: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Men On The Border[edit]

Having to add citations (in order to improve the submission's referencing: the article was originally deleted because submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability) -PCMorphy72 (talk) 12:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@PCMorphy72: Yes check.svg Done draft already restored for you to work on, see reply just above. JohnCD (talk) 12:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:All Youths Tush Awards[edit]

I, Tush Dayo Pearl, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tush Dayo Pearl (talk) 13:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@Tush Dayo Pearl: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

User:Mgehlsen/sandbox[edit]

I, Mgehlsen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mgehlsen (talk) 14:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@Mgehlsen: X mark.svg Not done. Wikipedia is not a social-networking site for people to write about themselves. JohnCD (talk) 14:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Neue Gestaltung[edit]

I, Mehrinhalt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mehrinhalt (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@Mehrinhalt: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Diss Grammar School[edit]

I, Sefdik, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I have been inactive for some time and would now like to get this page fit for purpose. "Save page" button below -Sefdik /0^0\ (talk) 16:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@Sefdik: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Diss Grammar School. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Marc Senter, photographed by Dario D'India.jpg[edit]

We received a valid permission from the photographer, see ticket:2016012610015083 -Jcb (talk) 18:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@Jcb: Yes check.svg Done - I have restored the file, removed the di tag, and added the OTRS permission template. I am not sure how much of the remaining stuff on the file description page needs to be kept - will you sort that out? JohnCD (talk) 20:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! I have cleaned up the description page. Jcb (talk) 20:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Richard B Hollis[edit]

Holowiki (talk) 19:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@Holowiki: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Richard B Hollis. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" JohnCD (talk) 20:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Arteezy[edit]

talk page deleted under WP:A8, main article has since been restored -Prisencolin (talk) 20:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done JohnCD (talk) 21:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Ronald Rand[edit]

I, Ron Jay, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ron Jay (talk) 00:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

This page is not deleted, but was accepted many months ago as an article Ronald Rand. There is nothing to restore. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:The Global Intelligence (magazine)[edit]

I, Sadrx, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sadrx (talk) 00:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)


This page was deleted legitimately, but I would like to improve it to meet the community standards. Thank you.

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:H. Kumar Wickramasinghe[edit]

I, Muhammad.28.1989, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Muhammad.28.1989 (talk) 01:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Jordan Carlton Schaul head shot.jpeg[edit]

OTRS ticket received. -Darwinius (talk) 07:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

@Darwinius: Sorry I'm just not seeing a valid permission in that OTRS ticket. First of all, it comes from a gmail address that cannot be validated as really belonging to the subject. We need an email from his domain, or at least a temporary page on his website acknowledging the ticket for verification. The deleted page refers to a source website http://dogtrainerdude.com/about-jordan/ that has a different contact email from the one in the OTRS ticket. Secondly, only the photographer can grant permission for re-use, not the subject of the photograph. In this particular photograph, he is clearly not the photographer; in fact he is shown holding his own camera. ~Amatulić (talk) 08:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Mutatis mutandis 242.png[edit]

OTRS ticket received. -Darwinius (talk) 07:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done, file restored and removed public domain tagging, replaced with CC-by-SA and GFDL licenses. In this case, the uploader does appear to have a close connection with the deceased composer Herbert Brun, having collaborated professionally in performances, editing one of his books, and publishing collected writings. ~Amatulić (talk) 08:53, 13 February 2016 (UTC)