Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrator instructions

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts:

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases


float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:


Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates
Files
Possibly unfree files (PUF)
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Contents

Draft:Valerie Hansen[edit]

I had planned on editing the citations to make it publishable but never had the time to finish until now -71.202.160.188 (talk) 22:52, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Daya Singh Bedi[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Sunamikapreeti (talk) 08:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

My contribution to Daya Singh Bedi wikipedia has been deleted without warning or discussion or suggestion for improvement or reason for deletion by a certain Sigmabaroda who by his own admission is not versed in the casts and sects of Sikhism.

I have suggested to revert the page to it's original and go step by step on what is in in sync with your policies. This is my first time on wikipedia and my knowledge extends to Sikhism only.

Thank you.

  • This page, Daya Singh Bedi, is not deleted. Instead people are reverting your edits. Please talk about this at talk:Daya Singh Bedi. What I notice is that others are asking about sources. What is required is some kind of reference to know where the information came from. If you know the documents that have this information, pelase provide a reference to them with your additions. They do not have to be in English. However we do not allow personal information, or what is acquired by just talking to people, it needs to be in a fixed form, such as writing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Hillerbrand + Magsamen[edit]

The Wikipedia page 'Hillerbrand + Magsamen' was deleted at the request of its initial creator Bonniebrunk. Stephan Hillerbrand and Mary Magsamen, the subjects of the wikipedia page had asked if the page could be deleted so they could each have their own individual pages rather then a page about their collaborative career. There have been 4 attempts to create individual pages for Stephan Hillerbrand and Mary Magsamen but they have been denied, citing that they "submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability."

If individual pages can not be created for the two individuals Stephan Hillerbrand and Mary Magsamen, then the original wikipedia page 'Hillerbrand + Magsamen' should be restored. This page was created in 2012 and has been around for 3 years. It has been reviewed and passed evidence the subject's notability. The original creator of the page, Bonniebrunk, is asking for it to be restored and undeleted.

Save page" button below -Bonniebrunk (talk) 16:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

@Bonniebrunk: X mark.svg Not done. Although deletion by PROD had been requested, the page was actually deleted as a copyright violation from http://www.auxiliaryprojects.com/HMmultiples and other sites, so it cannot be restored. You are welcome to write an article in your own words, but it should be based mainly on what others say about them, not on what they say about themselves. If that is accepted, I would think redirects to it from the individual names could be added.
The terms of the deletion request: "Both Mary Magsamen and Stephan Hillerbrand would like the page deleted so that they can make their own individual pages", show a misunderstanding of Wikipedia: this is an encyclopedia, not a place for people to make their own pages; that is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 20:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

User:Jarrod underground elephant/sandbox/Underground Elephant[edit]

I, Jarrod underground elephant, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Underground Elephant Inc. (talk) 16:37, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

@Jarrod underground elephant: Yes check.svg Done. The page was moved to Draft:Underground Elephant and deleted there. A new version of that draft page was created on 4 January by user JarrodRussell (talk · contribs), who I guess is you. I have done a history-merge so that the earlier, deleted versions are available via the "View history" tab. If you take content from them, bear in mind the reviewers' comments on this version.
Check out WP:Notability (organizations and companies) and WP:Notability (summary); also the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use ("Paid contributions without disclosure" under section 4), and in some jurisdictions by laws against covert advertising, to disclose your interest in any edits where you have a COI. JohnCD (talk) 22:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Older women walking with bikes bike-ped pfluger bridge austin.jpg[edit]

We have received a permission, see ticket:2015111010027225 -Jcb (talk) 16:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Older woman with flowers protected bike lane boston.jpg[edit]

We have received a permission, see ticket:2015111010027225 -Jcb (talk) 16:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Double buffered bike lane family trailer chicago.jpg[edit]

We have received a permission, see ticket:2015111010027225 -Jcb (talk) 16:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Waheed Murad[edit]

No debate has taken place before the deletion because I was not aware about it. I intend to improve it so please give me a chance. -175.107.8.3 (talk) 20:57, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 December 24, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MER-C (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:08, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Note 175.107.8.3 requested help on my talk page with identifying possible articles for this category at User talk:RevelationDirect#Category:Waheed Murad if anyone else wishes to contribute to that conversation. Thanks! RevelationDirect (talk) 02:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Karhoo[edit]

We believe the page was well within Wikipedia's Terms and Conditions and are happy to edit the page further to conform even more so. The firm is a notable and established company on par with Uber or Lyft. As a result we believe it to merit its own wikipedia page. If this cannot be reinstated we would like the text back for informational purposes -2606:6000:67C6:FC00:E919:1F18:A333:CC23 (talk) 22:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done My suggestion is that you let someone else not connected with the company or its promoters write it. Then there is less chance of promotional writing appearing. I am unconvinced by "on par", Uber has 64,000,000 news stories out there, Lyft over 2 million, and Karhoo has 645. If you are going to write something, please do so at Draft:Karhoo. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Understood. Thank you for your help and we will do so. In the meanwhile please can we have the text to the original article.

X mark.svg Not done because it was deleted as a WP:CSD#G11 promotional article. I personally have no objection to moving it to draft space for submission via WP:AFC, but you'll have to ask the deleting administrator @Ged UK: for restoration. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:37, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Daniel Ishag[edit]

Please reinstate this page as we intent to work on it and bring it in line with Wikipedia's terms and conditions. -2606:6000:67C6:FC00:E919:1F18:A333:CC23 (talk) 22:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

I deleted this as an advertisement, and I think that's correct. I have doubts about notability, but I would not have speedy deleted on that basis alone, but rather used AfD. I have been requested on my user talk by someone who is presumably the same editor to restore it, and I shall email them a copy. DGG ( talk ) 22:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Chong-Moon Lee[edit]

I, 50.185.71.209, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 50.185.71.209 (talk) 23:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Need more time to finalize -50.185.71.209 (talk) 23:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done This was fairly promotional in tone and a search also showed that some of it was taken from this website. Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted information and even if permission was given to use the content, it's still too promotional for Wikipedia and would need to be re-written. I have no problem with e-mailing you a copy of the article for you to revise, however. Are you @Bjjung:? If so, do you still have access to the e-mail account you used to sign up with? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:15, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Genghis Grill[edit]

This article was speedy deleted back in 2010. I'm not sure what was there before. I think I may be able to salvage this article. If need be, could its contents please be moved to Draft:Genghis Grill? -Steel1943 (talk) 23:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

  • I'll move it, but I'm not sure that it'll be all that helpful given the limited information in the article and the fact that it was only sourced to the company website. I don't think that C.Fred would have an issue with this, but I'll tag him in this just in case. On a side note, mmm... Genghis Grill. I've never been there, but their food always smells good whenever I go by one of their restaurants. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:18, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
    • No objections. And on a side note, I think I have eaten there. —C.Fred (talk) 05:33, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Yes check.svg Done Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Debt-stacking method[edit]

I, Max Paxman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Max Paxman (talk) 03:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

  • @Max Paxman: This is mildly promotional and at best reads like a personal essay written to showcase this method in the best light possible, so I do need to warn you that this would need to be completely re-written to meet WP:NPOV guidelines. It might be better for you to re-write this from scratch. Also, I have to ask: do you have a conflict of interest with any of this? (IE, do you work in a business where it'd benefit you if this was written in a positive manner?) You can still edit if you do, but you will need to read over WP:COI and disclose this COI somewhere, either on the article or on your user page. I'm not opposed to restoring this, just that we need to know the COI and to let you know that this would need a pretty thorough re-write. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
  • (ec) Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:29, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Jeff Reine-Adelaide[edit]

Please restore the edit history prior to the article being deleted at AfD. Player made his professional debut today, so in not notable. -JMHamo (talk) 17:34, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Symbol question.svg Question: This is not that simple, as the deleted page was moved to Jeff Reine Adélaïde and then deleted. A merge could happen, but what name is better> Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:34, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
@Graeme Bartlett: GiantSnowman had performed the Histmerge, so this is now resolved. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 01:32, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Mohun Bagan first logo.jpg[edit]

Kindly fix the error/problem from the file and please don't delete it. -— Swastik Chakraborty (User talk) 05:28, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done However this is not the right place to ask. you could have asked at the WP:Teahouse. Actually there is a gallery of logos, so there may need to be a better justification. But if this one is from 1889 as claimed, then it would be public domain by age. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:55, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
@Graeme Bartlett: Thanks a lot! — Swastik Chakraborty (User talk) 08:58, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

User:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Caldera Lauca[edit]

A few months ago, I requested deletion because the main source I intended to use was gone. Now however the site is back up, so I can start working on it again. Can this page be undeleted please? -Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - I have restored the article draft. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 11:33, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gnatta#Awards[edit]

Hi - Gnatta has won a number of awards in the last 6 months, building up some of the notability that was lacking in the previous submission. I think the page is ready for a redraft. Aebrown1993 (talk) 19:36, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

@Aebrown1993: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Slovenian under-17 League[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jstzan (talk) 21:49, 10 January 2016 (UTC) Hi, I do not undersand why would the "Slovenian under-17 League" be deleted? All the info is legit and the source is the Slovenian FA.

CSD G13[edit]

I, Gdmichaels, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gdmichaels (talk) 00:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Gdmichaels (talk) 00:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:TroveStar. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Various logos[edit]

Kindly fix the error/problem from the file and please don't delete it. -— Swastik Chakraborty (User talk) 06:05, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

@SWASTIK 25: You were requested above to take these requests to WP:Teahouse. This page is to request undeletion, and these files are not deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:29, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Man Booker Prizelogo.png[edit]

I don't know why it was replaced. However, I nominated the Commons image for deletion due to UK's low threshold of originality. Therefore, this local image should be undeleted and then reinserted to Man Booker Prize. -George Ho (talk) 08:58, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

@George Ho: Question: the file currently used and at Commons is File:The Man Booker Prize 2015 Logo.jpg and is the current logo. It has more color and is different than the file you want restored. Would it be preferable to wait on the Commons discussion or to make a local copy of that file instead rather than restoring this different image? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
What does the local one look like? Is it similar to the Commons image? George Ho (talk) 09:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
The local one is very different, it is a giant beige coloured lowercase e with "The Man Booker Prizes" text superimposed in white. You can see it here: http://www.thebookpeople.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Man_Booker_Prizelogo.png . So if you don't like that, George you had better rescue the commons image (which is specific for 2015) to upload locally. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
I like the one that omits the year, the grey giant "e". --George Ho (talk) 13:27, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Nevertheless, that should be indefinite or temporary. Uploading the newer logo in big size without a year isn't easy. George Ho (talk) 13:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
No, wait. I'm able to easily upload a big size PNG image. Should not be SVG. I must withdraw the request if I can upload it soon. George Ho (talk) 13:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Created File:The Man Booker Prize 2015 logo.png. I'm withdrawing request. George Ho (talk) 13:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Cotrobuz[edit]

This is a food for which there is no reference on the entire internet. The food recipe is local (extremly few persons know it) and I wanted to make it accesible to everyone because it tasted very good. "Save page" button below -Iuliu pop (talk) 13:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. Hi Iuliu pop. Your request validates the reason for deletion and that Wikipedia should not have an article on the topic. Wikipedia is by its nature a tertiary source that provides a survey of information already the subject of publication in the wider world. Accordingly, we require that information be verifiable in reliable sources, that topics demonstrate notability, and that articles do not engage in original research. In sum, Wikipedia is never the proper place for first publication of new things, no matter how exciting, novel and worthy one might think they are, because of the type of reference work an encyclopedia is.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Mick Murphy[edit]

I, Burlington Bert, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Burlington Bert (talk) 15:04, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

User:Dratslab/Brian Alabaster[edit]

I, Dratslab, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dratslab (talk) 15:06, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Talkwalker[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 213.135.239.28 (talk) 17:44, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Tim Groseclose Headshot.jpg[edit]

We have received permission by photographer, see ticket:2015110910027317 -Jcb (talk) 22:43, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Legacy Devers Eye Institute[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jtrosenb (talk) 23:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:16, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Virtualstock[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Backland (talk) 23:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Reverse Australia[edit]

I, 119.93.163.113, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 119.93.163.113 (talk) 01:05, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Kathreen Khavari[edit]

I, Luvbrasco, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Luvbrasco (talk) 01:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:28, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Please Myself pink cover.jpg[edit]

I reclassified the image as free to use only in English Wikipedia, not Commons. Previous revisions should be undeleted. -George Ho (talk) 04:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

File:StagecoachGroup.svg[edit]

I reclassified it as free only in En wiki, not Commons. Previous versions should be undeleted. -George Ho (talk) 04:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Though previous version looks to be the same as the visible version. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:19, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

File:FromGenesistoRevelation.jpg[edit]

Same for this one. -George Ho (talk) 04:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done restored the oldest higher res version. The other versions are worse. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

File:New Order Movement Cover.jpg[edit]

And this one. -George Ho (talk) 04:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/satron.lk[edit]

I, Nilashan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nilashan (talk) 06:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrew Osta[edit]

I, DaveBarrows22, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DaveBarrows22 (talk) 08:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:53, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Percolate (Company)[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) ChrisBolman (talk) 16:48, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:16, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

User:João Horta Belo/sandbox[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) João Horta Belo (talk) 19:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


User:João Horta Belo/sandbox

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

File:OnePlus Two Press - Front.png[edit]

The image served as the only product image for the article OnePlus 2. Now there is no image. It is common for mobile phone articles to feature an image of the phone. The image was released as a Press Pack release image. -∫ A Y™ 19:53, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done The reason is that this sort of image is replaceable, it can be replaced by a photo taken of the phone, so we cannot justify fair use. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:14, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:David Lock Associates Ltd (DLA)[edit]

I, MK Chris87, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MK Chris87 (talk) 20:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Concordia Logo.png[edit]

Licensing has been added to the image. -Unrealy2k (talk) 20:53, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

  • This file is not deleted, so nothing to do here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:09, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Federal Trade Commission Office of Policy Planning[edit]

96.255.127.23 (talk) 22:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:50, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

UC_Berkeley_School_of_Public_Health[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Sphweb (talk) 23:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

I am trying to update the content and the logo on this page. The text is inaccurate and the logo is out of date. Since I am affiliated with the UC Berkeley School of Public Health, my contribution was called a conflict of interest and my edits removed. I am simply trying to make the text accurate, the logo updated, and the citations accurate. Thanks you for your help in restoring my edits.

@Sphweb: you are in the wrong place. This page is for requesting undeletion of deleted articles. Please use the article talk page to propose your changes. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:34, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Visual C++ name mangling[edit]

This page contained viable information regarding the Visual C++ name mangling scheme that cannot be found anywhere else on the internet. Subjects like these require original research due to the nature of the content. At the very least I would like a copy of this page or have it undeleted long enough for me to retrieve the information and store it locally. Thank you very much. -2605:E000:A895:A400:C1CE:9C27:3A4E:BE6A (talk) 05:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Horacio LeDon[edit]

I, Horacio ledon, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Horacio ledon (talk) 09:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:00, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:The Angelic Process[edit]

I, 85.138.247.195, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 85.138.247.195 (talk) 18:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 19:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

List of Doraemon media[edit]

WP:NOTDUP, article deleted under a false assumption that redundant categories and navboxes are unacceptable -Prisencolin (talk) 01:41, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

User:Nona118/sandbox[edit]

I, Nona118, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nona118 (talk) 08:27, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:22, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Chimsnero Goldsmith[edit]

Please this page should not be deleted because the are real fact from good source. Thanks "Save page" button below -Realonehqsource (talk) 12:36, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

    • X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chimsnero Goldsmith, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user The Bushranger (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. -- GB fan 14:34, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

User:InvincibleBlaze/sandbox/Littlewargame[edit]

I, InvincibleBlaze, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Also somebody banned me so how was I supposed to work on it? InvincibleBlaze (talk) 14:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- GB fan 14:36, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Christophe Rossard-Allen[edit]

I, NotablePeoples, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NotablePeoples (talk) 16:46, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:46, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Roundtop Mountain Resort[edit]

I see that Roundtop Mountain Resort has been recreated with a copyvio page and is now tagged for speedy. I missed the PROD on the old version or would have contested it. I request that an administrator speedy the current copyvio version and restore the prodded version so we can work on that version.--Jahaza (talk) 17:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC) -Jahaza (talk) 17:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

What work can be done on it? 331dot (talk) 17:50, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
It can be expanded with reliable sources (of which there are many on Proquest.)--Jahaza (talk) 19:32, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done I have restored the old version, which is also somewhat promotional, the newer one was not much of any copyright infringement, so I did not delete, just replaced by old version. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:41, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nate_Burns[edit]

Nathanael (Nate) Burns wrote a screenplay at the age of 7 which was made into a movie and has been screened by three International Film Festivals and it has won awards. This is noteworthy and deserves to be put into WIKIPEDIA. Thank you! -Lmduprez (talk) 21:23, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done It seems most of the references were not working, so notability was unproved. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:44, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Simon Russell (actor)[edit]

I, M77m, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. M77m (talk) 22:54, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

@M77m: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Jamais Cascio[edit]

This article, which I have been maintaining, was summarily deleted on Nov 22 without explanation or discussion, other than flags implying the subject was self-editing (untrue), and that references were unreliable (debatable: I am taking pains to adhere to Wikipedia reference policy). This has happened before, and I will be approaching Mr Gerard about it in due course. I am also curious to know why I was not informed of this deletion earlier, since I have a watch on the page -Arfisk (talk) 01:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The prod was applied by PeterWesco, and he notified IP User talk:209.204.154.175. But this user has hardly done anything since. Also notifying an IP that created it 10 years before may not have been the best. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:55, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Alternate aTTaX[edit]

expired PROD deletion, probably notable, will attempt cleanup of page -Prisencolin (talk) 06:21, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Tommy Ingemarsson[edit]

expired PROD deletion, WP:NTEMP, will attempt page cleanup -Prisencolin (talk) 06:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Crunchy Data Solutions[edit]

I, Prlaurence, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Prlaurence (talk) 11:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

@Prlaurence: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:56, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Paysafecard[edit]

In November 2014, this article has been deleted after proper discussion and for good reasons. However, the relevance of the company should be clearly established in the meantime (and the article, may it have been bad, has possibly some recyclable content - therefore I ask to undelete it as a draft). Arguments in favour of notability:

  • British former paysafecard competitor Ukash has been confirmed to be notable, and has been merged into paysafecard last year by their mutual purchaser, British e-commerce company Skrill, who preferred paysafecard as the better brand for whatever reasons. Ukash and paysafecard also have gained a lot of mutual web and media attention for the same reasons (Example). It appears inconsistent Ukash to be notable, but paysafecard not notable.
  • Austrian financial newspaper WirtschaftsBlatt has honoured paysafecard as the capital Vienna's leading "Big Player" company in 2015, see report (in German). -KnightMove (talk) 14:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
@KnightMove: Yes check.svg Done - restored to Draft:Paysafecard. As I was the deleting admin, please check with me when you think it is ready, and I will decide whether it should go to WP:DRV. You will see from the AfD that what it needs is not long lists of refs, but ones that really provide "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". JohnCD (talk) 17:21, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft: Dean Faulkner Wells[edit]

I, Penslips, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I have been off-line doing research for this article for the last few months. Can someone please undelete the draft I was working on so that I may add my references/notations and continue my work. Thank you. Can you please return it to my drafts. Thank you. Penslips (talk) 15:06, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

@Penslips: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:03, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Harmala Gupta[edit]

I, 2A02:1811:D21:200:19D5:6601:283:12DB, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I would like to work further on the page draft - [Special:Contributions/2A02:1811:D21:200:19D5:6601:283:12DB|2A02:1811:D21:200:19D5:6601:283:12DB]] (talk) 15:17, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Steven WIlliam Roman[edit]

It was deleted for not having a reliable reference. I am steven william Roman and I am a reliable refrence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steverco (talk • contribs) 15:40, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Comment corrected syntax and linked to what I believe is the correct article. Recommend not restoring.--Jahaza (talk) 16:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Oswald Werner[edit]

have time to work on it some more -Bernardwerner (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=699986042"