Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Administrator instructions

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of pages and files which have already been deleted. If the page you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that pages deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G4, G5, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

Birtukan_Bouele[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Celec360 (talk) 07:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. If the deletion reason was R2, add "Draft:" to the start of your article's title. It was moved to draft space. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 09:45, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
To clarify, the page exists as Draft:Birtukan Bouele. —C.Fred (talk) 22:55, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Oppa Teach Korean[edit]

Page was deleted because of R2: Cross-namespace redirect from mainspace. Previously it was deleted because of copyright issue which i submit a request to the submission team. But there is no reply from the team. I submitted about 7 days ago. So i created a new page as I thought the admin did not see my email. After creating a new post. My post was immediately become a post and not a draft. So i click move to draft. However I was then told by another user that i should not use facebook referencing because it's promotional which i gave my explaination that I can provide video references from a media company but facebook is easy to see since there is the copyright permission giving. Then a user Fastily deleted my 2nd version (1st version wasn't restored, i just recreated), under R2. Could you please help me to put it properly under Draft pending submission please. Thank you —LearnKoreanToday (talk) 13:11, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Not done You can discuss the deletion of the draft with user:Athaenara. However from your user name and what you are writing about, it does appear to be a promotion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:48, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
  • R2 means it was deleted as a redirect from article to draftspace, generally speaking. But then the draft was deleted after that as blatant promotion (G11) which will not be restored here. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 00:53, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Justin Klosky[edit]

Please restore it to draft space I want to go through it again and improve it. —Ziggy 2milli (talk) 16:23, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ziggy 2milli (talkcontribs) 00:54, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Radspherin[edit]

I, RajeRaje, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. RajeRaje (talk) 18:13, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:55, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Calvin Abhishek[edit]

I had requested PROD for the page when the user was not notable, he's now notable. —Coderzombie (talk) 07:45, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Hut 8.5 07:54, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

O'Darien Bassett[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Tszyeung1988 (talk) 09:36, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

1. O'Darien Bassett

2. I had reedited several of reliable references with significant coverage for the page. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yes check.svg Done (somewhat), Created again in draftspace. PorkchopGMX (talk with me - what i've done) 17:45, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Raashi Bawa[edit]

The actress has become much popular now and she is eligible for a Wikipedia Page. —Pablo1112001 (talk) 11:07, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raashi Bawa, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Kusma (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. PorkchopGMX (talk with me - what i've done) 12:36, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Gitpod/test[edit]

I, ChristinFrohne, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ChristinFrohne (talk) 13:05, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

I would like to edit the article regarding to the given feedback, would be great if you can restore the article for that reason. Thanks in advance ChristinFrohne (talk) 13:52, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. Also, please do not request an undeletion of a page and say that it was deleted under a different criteria than what it was actually deleted under. PorkchopGMX (talk with me - what i've done) 17:38, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
I totally get why it has been deleted, but I still would like to rewrite it. I got a lot of good feedback which I would like to implement it now. And sorry about the wrong criteria, idk how that happened it was not my intention to change it. Can you please restore the article, so I can continue working on it? Thanks a lot ChristinFrohne (talk) 06:45, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
I would like to, but unfortunately i don't have the power to restore your article. Only administrators can do that, and i'm not one of them so ask one of them about it. PorkchopGMX (talk with me - what i've done) 15:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

@Jimfbleak: The tone of the draft doesn't come across to me as promotional, even though its intent may be for publicity. I wouldn't object to restoring it and letting it go through normal AFC review. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:12, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

@Anachronist:, ChristinFrohne is a (now declared) paid editor, whose other creation, Draft:Eclipse Theia is also a promo for his employers. He has also been removing warnings and advice, like this from me from his talk page. Personally I have no interest in helping him with his paid editing beyond the advice I gave, but as always I'm happy for a fellow admin to take whatever actions they see fit if they take a different view. Thanks for asking, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:38, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Barbee (musician)[edit]

I, Musicxpertz, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Musicxpertz (talk) 18:44, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

 Declined. @Musicxpertz: this is an older version of Draft:Barbee (singer). There is no reason to have duplicate drafts of the same subject. Please continue working on Draft:Barbee (singer) instead. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Saranga Disasekara[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Jackbarbera (talk) 02:51, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

  • The page was still existing, but I have restored the 2016 history. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:38, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:RAVEN-II Surgical Robot[edit]

I, 76.121.191.68, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 76.121.191.68 (talk) 03:08, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:39, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

O'Darien Bassett (2)[edit]

I, Tszyeung1988, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tszyeung1988 (talk) 04:33, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

I had added several qualified references with reliable media coverage in different countries for the page. Please check the page draft from: Draft:O'Darien Bassett, thank you. —Tszyeung1988 (talk) 05:48, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O'Darien Bassett, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Tone (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
You can ask the deleting admin to review your draft, or submit it through the normal WP:AFC channel. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:07, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:BlazeClan Technologies[edit]

I, Dipti at Blazeclan, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dipti at Blazeclan (talk) 08:08, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:42, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

File:VIsibleCloaksReassemblage.jpg[edit]

This file was deleted under WP:F5 when Reassemblage (album) was moved to Draft:Reassemblage (album). The draft has been promoted back to article space at Reassemblage (album). — Newslinger talk 10:40, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Kred Influence Measurement[edit]

Kred is the most notable Influence Measurement tool available. Over 400K users and over 1M followers on Facebook. I believe the admin who deleted the page was unsatisfied with the cited references. I recently added new references which were overlooked. This page has been live for 8 years with no issue and I believe it was deleted by an administrator who found it easier to delete than to give guidance on improving the article. —CameronBale (talk) 15:15, 17 January 2019 (UTC) CameronBale (talk) 15:15, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kred Influence Measurement, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

David Landau6 request[edit]

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) David Landau6 (talk) 15:44, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

X mark.svg Please repair your request – we cannot process malformed requests. Please use the code {{subst:refund| pageName|reasoning}} (replacing pagename with the name of the page you wish to have restored and reasoning with the reason for your request). PorkchopGMX (talk with me - what i've done) 15:57, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Landau may be relevant here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:16, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Repaired request. The requester has Dave Landau in the deleted contributions. X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Landau, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Randykitty (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:04, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

User:Pizzahut2/sandbox[edit]

There are references on talk pages to some revisions of this page, so I believe I made a mistake. —Pizzahut2 (talk) 20:42, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done Hut 8.5 21:30, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:T._Douglas_Stump[edit]

I, Steedokc, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Steedokc (talk) 22:41, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

 Done by Alexf (talk · contribs) ~Anachronist (talk) 23:57, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Vitex Pharmaceuticals[edit]

edit submission to try and obtain wiki eligibility —MMVitex (talk) 01:16, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Well, if it isn't notable, no amount of editing can fix that. PrussianOwl (talk) 02:20, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Hi MMVitex, I've left you a welcome message with some information about Wikipedia's conflict of interest policies. I just need you to disclose your conflict of interest on your talk page. You don't have to give out really personal details, but you do have to have something on your userpage about this and also make a note of this on the talk page of the draft. I'd also strongly recommend that you go through WP:ADVENTURE, which is a bit of an overview of Wikipedia's editing guidelines. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 02:22, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
  • I do agree with PrussianOwl though, in that the organization does need to meet notability guidelines. --ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 02:22, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:FrancisGotHeat[edit]

I, PrussianOwl, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to merge it into the mainspace page. PrussianOwl (talk) 01:52, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

  • @PrussianOwl: There's already an article on this person in the mainspace at FrancisGotHeat. There wasn't any real content in the page and the only sources that look like they could be usable are already in the article. There's really nothing in the draft that would help out the existing page, which needs a lot of work. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 02:18, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:ClassMarker[edit]

I, Edufan21, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Edufan21 (talk) 09:04, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Kreb (cereal)[edit]

I, Paulthomaswells, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Paulthomaswells (talk) 15:26, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft: Goest Ryder[edit]

Draft: Goest Ryder

The page has been deleted under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Kindly restore it so I can continue working on it and even retrieve the files used. I would say that this is my first submitted article and I was confused to use the same username creating the account and in creating the page. Basically I am just a fan (kenyan) of the article topic (mentioning used based issue). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goest Ryder (talkcontribs) 20:49, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Requested by user:Goest Ryder
The page User:Goest Ryder was deleted because it was an advertisement. The draft is not deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:59, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
It is now history merged with Goest Ryder Brand. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:56, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

File:A4E logo.png[edit]

File was deleted under F5 (unused file), I don't actually know if the file is File:Action for Employment (A4E) Logo.png or whether there's a difference so if it's the same then it should remain deleted, Anyway thanks —–Davey2010Talk 21:16, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

  • @Davey2010: it's not quite the same as the one you linked to but it is extremely similar, it just has the text "improving people's lives" added to the end (as in this). Hut 8.5 21:21, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi User:Hut 8.5, Ah okay I thought it was, Looking online it seems to be a 50/50 thing where half they use the slogan and others they don't but as the slogan is in the article already it would seem quite pointless having it in the logo too, Okie dokie thanks for your help it's much appreciated :), –Davey2010Talk 21:25, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

EverlyWell[edit]

The wiki should be kept. Obviously, needs some work for improvement but it has an encyclopedic knowledge which is always necessary in Wikipedia. If references are valid, verifiable and brings insight to the encyclopedia, there would be no causes for its deletion. —Wikizziola (talk) 22:52, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. If the deletion reason was R2, add "Draft:" to the start of your article's title. As the page is at AfD, if it gets deleted as a result it's ineligible for restoration here. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 22:54, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Naray[edit]

page editing was still in progress —23.240.65.133 (talk) 09:31, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. The article had sat for six months since the last edit. That does not count as "in progress" by Wikipedia's standards; instead, it makes the article look abandoned. —C.Fred (talk) 21:01, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Georgi Ingilizov[edit]

I, Bonibonka, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bonibonka (talk) 11:21, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:55, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Stalking Back[edit]

I will like to restore the article because is a very important movie concerning events resulting in a change of law passed for stalking — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki10 (talkcontribs) 14:06, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
@Wiki10: Please address the concerns raised in the draft review. The article must be improved before it can be moved back to the main space. —C.Fred (talk) 21:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Thomas Clarke (professor)[edit]

I want to work on it —ClarkeFThomas (talk) 21:10, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

For those who see the redlink, this page was subsequently speedy deleted under CSD G7. —C.Fred (talk) 23:02, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Wealth Dragons[edit]

draft was deleted because it wasn't edited for 6 months or more —Uk2108 (talk) 23:37, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
@Uk2108: The draft has been restored. Please address the concerns raised in the reviews. —C.Fred (talk) 17:13, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Talk:School strike for climate[edit]

Both page was reverted and Talk page was deleted without any discussion. Probably some mistake when well-sourced article about an international movement was redirected to an article about a Swedish schoolgirl? —Jirka Dl (talk) 03:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, Bbb23 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Euwyn Poon[edit]

I, Samefox8, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Samefox8 (talk) 05:56, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
@Samefox8: Please address the concerns raised when the draft was reviewed. —C.Fred (talk) 17:15, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft: Andhra University College of Engineering for Women[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —AVI3347 (talk) 06:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!.
@AVI3347: The draft page has been recreated. Please continue to work on improving the draft. —C.Fred (talk) 17:11, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Emre Türkmen[edit]

I, Covaleen, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Covaleen (talk) 15:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
@Covaleen: Please address the concerns raised when the draft was reviewed. —C.Fred (talk) 17:17, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Nataliia Zharkova[edit]

I, Ubermensch01, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ubermensch01 (talk) 16:23, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}.
@Ubermensch01: The page has been restored into draft space. —C.Fred (talk) 17:22, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Raghavendra Akella[edit]

I, Gsrinivasakumar, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gsrinivasakumar (talk) 18:01, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:22, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

List of Jewish American generals and admirals[edit]

I'd be grateful for a userfication. I'd been mining the redlinks for notable topics in recent weeks. —Lagrange613 19:00, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

@Randykitty: any objection? ~Anachronist (talk) 21:25, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
No, go ahead, but Lagrange613 if you want to recreate the list as an article, you'll need to come up with sources that were not yet mentioned in the AfD debate. But I guess this is more to give you ideas for which articles to create, which should be fine. --Randykitty (talk) 21:34, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 Done. @Lagrange613: Restored to User:Lagrange613/List of Jewish American generals and admirals. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:06, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you Anachronist! Lagrange613 03:18, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Benild Joseph[edit]

I, Mobinmat, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mobinmat (talk) 19:45, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 07:44, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

User:Flooded with them hundreds (multiple)[edit]

All are script-related (I think) pages deleted under U1 by a now-retired user —DannyS712 (talk) 23:21, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

  • @DannyS712: none of these are actually scripts:

The others are rubbish or redirects. Hut 8.5 22:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

@Hut 8.5: I know that they were not the scripts themselves, those were already undeleted by iadmins. Would you be willing to undelete /scripts, /sectionremove, and /PageMoverClosure? I will be maintaining the latter two scripts, and the /scripts page may contain some useful stuff.--DannyS712 (talk) 22:16, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done @DannyS712: see User:DannyS712/scripts, User:DannyS712/sectionremover, User:DannyS712/PageMoverClosure. Hut 8.5 22:19, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Ally Adnan[edit]

I, Sayyonee19, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sayyonee19 (talk) 00:37, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
The page is now at Draft:Ally Adnan (executive). It was actually in two places in draft space. I have merged the histories together. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:18, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Laura Kissel[edit]

I, Bkeppy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. This second request is submitted in the hopes a draft might likewise be emailed to me, as I continue to work on it with my Professor. Was begun as part of edit-thon to repair the missing content of female creatives on Wikipedia, health got in the way of making the changes after the first draft was reviewed. Thank you, not sure how we might reach out in regards to sharing my personal email for a copy of the draft as posting it live is not the most clever. Bkeppy (talk) 01:40, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

You don't need a second request to ask for the contents be emailed to you, nor do you need to provide your email address anywhere on a public Wikipedia page. All you would need to do is have an email address associated with your account, and the admin will provide the text of the last revision to you via the "Email this user" function. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 02:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Since there is no email i have just restored the draft for you to copy or improve. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:48, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Procreate (software)[edit]

I, SaltySemanticSchmuck, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SaltySemanticSchmuck (talk) 02:18, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:12, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Comprehensive Future[edit]

I, 2A00:23C4:E270:2500:F467:2FA8:DBD6:3223, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2A00:23C4:E270:2500:F467:2FA8:DBD6:3223 (talk) 07:29, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:13, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Flock Rotisserie[edit]

I, Marhue, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Marhue (talk) 13:24, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:15, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation[edit]

I, Lynnevivaldi, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lynnevivaldi (talk) 14:10, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

I work for this small foundation and was bogged down with other tasks when I lost track of it. I will make it happen this time! —Lynnevivaldi (talk) 14:13, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

@Lynnevivaldi: would you please put a paid editing disclosure on your user page, please? See WP:PAID for details on the template to use. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:23, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Maria Roszak[edit]

I think this article may be on the notable topic, and am thinking about recreating it. To save time, I'd like to see what has been deleted - please restore it in my sandbox so I can review it. TIA. —Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 17:10, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

To help you decide, the references were [1] and [2] aka sister Cecylia (March 25, 1908 - November 16, 2018. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, yes, I am pretty sure the subject is notable - can you put it in my userspace so I can rewrite it? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:39, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Bellefield Presbyterian Church[edit]

I believe it was deleted because i hadn't worked on it for so long, I would like to work on it again, and can take it offline to work on if that is preferable. I do not have the version that was here in my files. Thank you! —Desperatelyneedscoffee (talk) 18:39, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:16, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Pat Noble[edit]

I was browsing Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Politicians saw this. I probably would have commented to keep had I saw it before the discussion was closed, but the results are pretty firm. My request is simply to WP:USERFYIT. I would like to see if I can expand and find more WP:RS to properly justify its inclusion under WP:GNG in the near future. —―Matthew J. Long -Talk- 00:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Given that it's been the subject of three AFDs and deleted each time, I'd say WP:DEADHORSE applies here. I don't really see the point of userfying, but I won't object if another admin decides it's appropriate, especially if the deleting admins agree. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
In all fairness, User:Anachronist, I am pretty sure the last AfD was a bit different from previous. I was able to find some rather decent WP:RS on Pat Noble. I'm really satisfied with some of them including AP News, IVN Patch in 2011, a Daily Caller, and philly.com. I'm pretty sure I will find more later as well. Honestly, Google must hate him or something because it's all buried. As you mentioned, I will yield to whatever @RL0919: prefers to see as the closer of the third nomination. ―Matthew J. Long -Talk- 04:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Also, I can happily say that I do not have an inherent stake here as I have never edited the article nor participating in previous discussions on it. I'd be bringing a bit of a different perspective when it comes to developing this. ―Matthew J. Long -Talk- 04:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
  • MattLongCT, the place for situations like this is Wikipedia:Deletion review where you will have to convince the admins there with those sources you listed that a recreation will be a good to go. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:10, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
  • As the most recent deleting admin, I agree with the skepticism others have expressed above. I looked at the previously deleted versions, and it doesn't seem like the evidence of notability has increased significantly over the years. It would probably be best for you to assemble a list of proposed sources and ask for those to be considered at WP:DRV, or else start a brand new draft that relies entirely on the new sources. There is no time limit for this, so I would encourage you to work on it for a bit to get the strongest sources you can muster. (If you come with just the list mentioned above, I doubt you will get much traction. I can explain further on your User talk page if you want details.) --RL0919 (talk) 16:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
RL0919, I appreciate both your and Jovanmilic97's response. I will privately compile the list of WP:RS over the next few days for Deletion review. I still would appreciate a follow up comment on my talk page, RL0919, if you don't mind, so I can hear more details, though. My hope is to meet WP:GNG with this if DR will be the proper forum, so I certainly want my ducks in a row. For now, this matter has been withdrawn. Thank you all for your help! ―Matthew J. Long -Talk- 18:23, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Salem Witches Institute[edit]

The Wiki page “Salem Witches Institute” was deleted because author JK Rowling said there was actually no school named “Salem Witches Institute”, however it was an organization. Personally, I thought the wiki page was cool and interesting and I was hoping to see it back up. It had interesting information on what could have been a school in the magical world, and all of the information provided on the wiki page opened up another world of possibilities for the fans of the Witch and Wizard world. Please consider my request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:199:680:37BD:247D:AF82:F58B:4682 (talk) 06:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Which page are you talking about? Salem Witches Institute has never existed, neither has Draft:Salem Witches Institute. I can't find any deleted page with a similar title. Hut 8.5 07:44, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
    • Perhaps it was an entry in some Potterverse wiki? Some folks think there is only one wiki, and it's us. --Orange Mike | Talk 09:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
      • That would be my guess. And to the requestor...
        Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? We have absolutely no control over Wikia/Fandom wikis or any other fan-made wiki project; you need to take it to the project where the page originally existed and make your case on whatever suitable page exists on that wiki. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 10:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC) (NB: A search using DuckDuckGo (string: salem witches institute) pulls up three different Harry Potter-related Fandom wikis, all with extant articles.)
    • see Salem Witches' Institute and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salem Witches' Institute. This was deleted over 11 years ago. Has anything been published on this topic since? (actually I think the answer is yes) The complete text of the deleted article was this: "The Salem Witches’ Institute is a fictional school for the education of witches (and wizards) from J. K Rowling’s Harry Potter series. It is mentioned in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire." which is not even fully correct, and there are no references at all. In the meantime you can view http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Salem_Witches%27_Institute . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Talend[edit]

This page must have been there, as duckduckgo refers to it in the infobox when you search for Talend. The name Talend is used multiple times on wikipedia, mostly because it aquired other companies. It seems that the buying company is more significant than the bought company, so I do not understand why there would not be a page for this company. I can not see what is on that page, but it must be more information than I could come up with if I decided to restart the page. —ReinierBattenberg (talk) 14:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talend (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Patar knight (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Alex Flynn[edit]

I, 2A02:C7F:6C17:8500:D99:F6D4:1DB8:50A7, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2A02:C7F:6C17:8500:D99:F6D4:1DB8:50A7 (talk) 15:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)


Draft:Mohit Bahl[edit]

I, 117.199.84.22, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 117.199.84.22 (talk) 15:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

The updation for this topic is going on.. Some links are valid and gathering more info... —117.199.84.22 (talk) 15:27, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Construction Monitor[edit]

I, Mattrhwrd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mattrhwrd (talk) 15:27, 22 January 2019 (UTC)