Page move-protected

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrator instructions

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G4, G5 or G11 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

Contents

Dennis Nagpal[edit]

Please reconsider my appeal for undeletion of the page. and Draft by Draft:Dennis Nagpal This article is not for advertising or promotional matter. Its about a casting director and executive producer who started working with some of the best production houses like endemol and colessum media in very less age. He was recently in news for controversy created by bigboss 11 contestant. I assure you that previous concerns are no longer a problem. Can you please fix the issue. The article which i need to create will be of proper referencing and will no longer have concerns in denying of article. Thanks in advance. Will be very grateful.Hbunnylife (talk) 10:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Hbunyylife —Hbunnylife (talk) 10:45, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Hbunnylife, it looks like there's quite a kerfuffle surrounding this article, so I'm going to ping Athaenara and RHaworth about this. This page is really only for the restoration of uncontroversial articles for the most part, so this is something you would have to talk to them about restoring. One of the biggest recommendations I can give you is that you should disclose your conflict of interest (ie, are you Nagpal or someone hired to write about him) and give examples of sourcing that you would use. Also, be careful about controversies as far as coverage and notability goes - not all of these are the type of things that Wikipedia tends to cover. From what I can tell, this looks to be relationship drama, which is not the type of thing that Wikipedia tends to consider encyclopedic enough to include or count as notability-giving. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 14:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
  • RHaworth, RHaworth , RHaworth (talk · contribs) Hi RHaworth, I am grateful to you for that. But i would request you to kindly allow me to edit the article and undelete it. I have already mentioned in my user that how am i connected to the person. I am gonna provide whatever detail, it will be with validated references. And will mention the resources accordingly. Will try to work on the article in the criteria of Wikipedia. And, sir i need to tell that i am not writing about the person to promote him. I just want make a article in which i do mention his work and how he made it to the position with all available references. So please i will request you to undelete it and give me a chance to improve the article. Hbunnylife (talk) 15:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Hbunnylife
  • User Hbunnylife is the 4th (so far) account promoting Nagpal. – Athaenara 22:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Athaenara- HiAthaenara , I am not here promoting nagpal, i want to resolve the issues which looks like a promotion. Kindly look into it . and, requesting you to please allow me to edit and modify the article so as it doesn't violate the terms of wikipedia. Kindly, allow me. it will be worthy of you.I assure you that previous concerns are no longer a problem. Can you please fix the issue.And, yes there will be no similarity in previous uploaded content and language. Kindly sir please look into it.@ RHaworth& Athaenara. Hbunnylife (talk) 05:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Hbunnylife
  • No, you are promoting Nagpal and we're not going to help you do it. If you continue as you have, you'll end up blocked like the rest of this fleet of single-purpose accounts. – Athaenara 07:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Athaenara RHaworth Hi, I assure you that the article will not be in any relation of his promotion. I am just asking a chance to improve it. and, put some originality in the article. If anything comes under promotion or advertising without any legal references. i will be responsible of that. Kindly, please grant me permission to improve it. and assurity is that there will be no previous concerns in the article. Please. I am just writing this article to show his work in the Television industry which he started in very less age and his inspiration.He is known Casting director and non fiction television producer. Kindly, Athaenara Please allow me. Please restore as because i intend to work on it. and, I am willing to improve the articles in wikipedia within its terms. I want to be honest that this article was my first experience on wikipedia. and, i am still trying to improve in it and learn the guideliness to edit and update the article .This is the reason i am continuosly working on this particular article. as i have managed to get infos of the person Dennis Nagpal.So please, admin kindly allow me to improve it. and, provide something to the community. i assure you that will continue to improve different articles in the wikipedia community. I am new and wasn't in real aware of guidelines. Thanking you. It will be assistful from your side to let me learn over to write and modify articles. and, yes i tried editing this article by the name Dennis Nagpal, by making different user accounts because my other accounts were blocked and i wasn't aware of guidelines. And, the reason for continuously writing about the same user is that he is well known director and producer in television industry and there were no articles present here on wikipedia. so i thought of starting on wikipedia with his page. So, i worked on for months to collect the real data of him. so kindly please admin allow me to finish it. it will be grateful from your side.and,in future i will try to get the subject verified within my draft so as it doesn't violate the criteria.Hbunnylife (talk) 11:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Hbunnylife
  •  CheckUser note: I just blocked Hbunnylife as a  Confirmed sock of Dennisnagpal at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dennisnagpal.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:10, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
    @Hbunnylife: The correct way to approach this would have been for you to get your original account unblocked and properly declared COI, not for you to evade the block with multiple other accounts. You have just made your problems worse. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Anachronist , admin i was not aware of the guideliness that if i make multiple accounts i'll get all blocked. I thought if my one account is blocked i can make other accounts, and i have already stated COI on my user page. Kindly, review. 196.207.127.190 (talk) 07:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Hbunnylife

You are evading your block right now. When you are blocked, the only thing you can do is try to get yourself unblocked. Pick an account and get yourself unblocked. Communicate only on your talk page. You have just made your problems worse, again. See Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and follow it. Do not post messages anywhere else but at the talk page of the account you want unblocked. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:37, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

DanTDM2017[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Geniusmisra (talk) 10:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Neter (2)[edit]

I, Andres51534, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Andres51534 (talk) 13:30, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. Copyright violations. Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:56, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Mike Dubois[edit]

I, Designlab1008, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Designlab1008 (talk) 20:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:30, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

User:SteveStrummer/Sandbox4[edit]

Userpage previously deleted by my own (author) request via G7); now seeking restoration for further use. —SteveStrummer (talk) 21:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done Hut 8.5 21:48, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Universidad ESAN[edit]

This is the Spanish name for ESAN University, a Spanish-speaking university, so it ought to redirect there. [I'd undelete it myself, but I'm away from my own computer.] Please note the history of ESAN University (its first edit included cleanup tags from three months before the page was created), so this might be a complex situation that warrants a history merge or some other not-so-basic action. —Nyttend backup (talk) 22:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

This one was only ever a redirect to itself, or an invalid redirect to a website, so no loss by deletion. I have make it redirect to ESAN University. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:52, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Kim Ou-joon[edit]

This deleted under Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Ou-joon. Please restore the page to Draft:Kim Ou-joon or User:Sawol/Kim Ou-joon as I intend to work on it. Thanks. —Sawol (talk) 03:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Ajabde[edit]

Please don't delete this page. This page need moderation. —103.89.254.2 (talk) 09:41, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

  • The page is now a redirect. Still there's nothing to restore. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Jad Bou Karam[edit]

I, 212.98.147.66, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 212.98.147.66 (talk) 10:52, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:11, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Hardcore of Sergeants[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Rasal Lia (talk) 14:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Hardcore of Sergeants was a guerrilla force formed with some children aged maximum twelve years old and worked in Sector- 9 during the liberation war of Bangladesh in 1971.

[1] [2] [3]

References

@Rasal Lia: Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I have restored Hard Core Sergeants and not Heardcore of Sergeants which doesn't exist (it existed with a capital 'Of' but that one is ineligible for restoration). ~Anachronist (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Robert Lyons (photographer) 2[edit]

I, Bgammwiki, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bgammwiki (talk) 17:26, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done It was recently deleted as unambiguously promotional, and furthermore we absolutely will not reinstate copyright violations, as this was copied from https://www.lensculture.com/robert-lyons — please start over from scratch. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Dune (upcoming film)[edit]

I, Tammydemo, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tammydemo (talk) 19:00, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Riordan Clinic[edit]

Our page was deleted by a user named Fastily, we use the Wikipedia page to help new patients get informed about our clinic which has been apart of Wichita's history since the 1970s. We are unaware of why the page was deleted but would like it undeleted. it is our hope that even if it is unable to become undeleted that we are given the chance to talk to an administrator about avoiding this in the future. —RiordanClinic (talk) 20:52, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done This page was deleted as a result of this discussion. If you want to page to be undeleted I suggest you go to deletion review as it doesn't qualify for restoration through this process. You should also read Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest, and you don't in any sense own a Wikipedia page about your organisation. Hut 8.5 21:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
    @RiordanClinic: You are talking to administrators. Wikipedia is not to be used for publicity purposes. If you get yourself unblocked, you may try creating an article in draft space or your sandbox, and submit the article for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Don't try to create it in main article space. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Template talk:Line 2 (Guangzhou Metro) RDT[edit]

See User talk:RHaworth#Guangzhou Metro. The template talk page should also be undeleted. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:34, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

 Done, restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:21, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Few image undeletions[edit]

OTRS Permission confirmed license release under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL under ticket number 2017101810012662Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

OTRS Permission confirmed license release under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL under ticket number 2017101810012662Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

OTRS Permission confirmed license release under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL under ticket number 2017101810012662Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

OTRS Permission confirmed license release under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL under ticket number 2017101810012662Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

OTRS Permission confirmed license release under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL under ticket number 2017101810012662Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done @Clarkcj12: Can you confirm that File:Helen and Frank-Greece.jpeg and File:Helen-Camera.jpeg are covered as they are not taken by Helen? Also as you can see some information is missing such as the date. Lastly can you add the correct OTRS templates? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Yes everything is in order and will do. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 17:17, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Alliance éthio-française of Dire Dawa[edit]

I, Nesrine.khelifi, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nesrine.khelifi (talk) 07:37, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

  • @Nesrine.khelifi: I restored this for you last year but nothing at all happened. What do you plan to do this time if it is restored? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Jon Claytor[edit]

I, Geneticmagnetic, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Geneticmagnetic (talk) 09:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:00, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Mount Eden Vineyards[edit]

I, Radicaldreamer29, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Radicaldreamer29 (talk) 10:00, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

VAG-COM[edit]

deleted and needs to be restored —72.73.76.155 (talk) 10:38, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

User:Nate 2169/sandbox/User:Nate 2169[edit]

I would like to re-edit it to where it meets Wikipedia's standards. —Nate 2169 (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. This is never going to be an article, but if you remove the afc temp-late it may be something on your user page! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:07, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Slam Allen[edit]

I, 67.243.85.202, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 67.243.85.202 (talk) 13:58, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:07, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Bruce Nathan[edit]

I would like to work on it. Seems relevant since he is a declared Replublican candidate for 2018 Florida governor —2600:1700:3880:EB40:D0D9:2E51:DAAD:1DFD (talk) 17:59, 17 January 2018 (UTC) --Archadrian (talk) 18:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Adam Johnson (wrestler)[edit]

I have been researching and working on this my first wiki page. I did due diligence to research source articles and links to support my subject, and mirrored other such subjects to create page. Yet I have been blasted for not being objective. I am not sure why??? —JWise70 (talk) 18:59, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You have not been "blasted". Instead you will need to rewrite the draft with less WP:Peacock terms. You can read the comment, or also ask Robert McClenon for further help. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Template:Main section[edit]

I'd like to have the content of this template userfied to User:Seppi333/Main section for personal reference; I don't intend to recreate this template from the userfied version. Alternatively, if an admin can copy/paste the text that was displayed in this hatnote template either on my talk page or here (and {{ping}} me if copy/pasted here), that would also be fine. Seppi333 (Insert ) 20:02, 17 January 2018 (UTC)


Draft:Raymond Smith (ballet)[edit]

I, Volcanohunter, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Volcanohunter (talk) 21:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:28, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Schuylar[edit]

This draft was not vandalism. It should therefore be undeleted. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:09, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

 Done It was not submitted to AFC either, so I have gone to an earlier version. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Mohammad Taqi Pessian[edit]

The reason for deletion was "falsification", while the career of this notable person is documented by the Encyclopedia Iranica source mentioned in the article. Please undelete it so I can prove it. —Pahlevun (talk) 22:19, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Josh C. Kline[edit]

I, Jaschwa1969, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jaschwa1969 (talk) 22:37, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:20, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Krishna_kaanth&action=edit&redlink=1[edit]

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Roophika Tiwari (talk) 02:27, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

International Board-Certified Lactation Consultant[edit]

And also International Board-Certified Lactation consultant please, with their Talk pages. One of these has history that is needed for GFDL purposes as explained on Talk:Lactation consultant. Both were deleted when Lactation consultant was prodded. —Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 05:16, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

  •  Done but the first, which was only ever a redirect, had no talk page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:54, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:ELFIO[edit]

I, 93.173.172.1, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 93.173.172.1 (talk) 10:53, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

I am going to edit this article again —93.173.172.1 (talk) 10:54, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:27, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

FastCopy[edit]

This page was PRODed by Fastily. However, this article should not be deleted since FastCopy was given Grand Prize in the Windows Forest Awards in 2015 (cf. [1] (in Japanese)), and any software which was awarded is no doubt notable.--RekishiEJ (talk) 12:39, 19 January 2018 (UTC) —RekishiEJ (talk) 12:39, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Destiny Radio 105.1 FM Logo.png[edit]

File was deleted under F5 (unused file), Thanks, —–Davey2010Talk 16:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Will do thanks Graeme Bartlett. –Davey2010Talk 23:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

JC Gonzalez[edit]

I recognize that the article was created by a banned user, but the original article was just a translation of the Spanish version, which anyone could have done. I was working on cleaning it up yesterday, and I was hoping to get back to it today. Because I think there's a good claim to notability there with in-depth coverage of him from multiple independent sources: [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Cheers, —-- irn (talk) 17:20, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

  • @Irn: I'm not sure we can restore this here but I think you'd have a reasonable case that the page shouldn't have been deleted under G5 because someone who isn't banned (you) had made significant contributions to it. I suggest you talk to the deleting admin and go to deletion review if you aren't satisfied. Hut 8.5 19:30, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
  • This article was deleted per a deletion discussion and has been repeatedly recreated by this sockmaster. The argument that this is just a translation of the Spanish version is invalid because that is the explicit work of the sock(s) at es.wiki and should be deleted there. See history to verify. I did not find the additions (sources) compelling. I have no objections to this going to deletion review and if they want it unsalted and restored, I will be happy to do this myself.
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 13:50, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
    Ok, I've started a discussion there. Cheers, -- irn (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Réalta (Band)[edit]

I, 82.8.23.126, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 82.8.23.126 (talk) 18:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Page was deleted as it had not been edited. I wish to edit this page and submit for approval —82.8.23.126 (talk) 18:39, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:01, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Creating Draft:Rhys Ford[edit]

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Humanplease (talk) 18:46, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:58, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Rolla Ramsey[edit]

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) George Fleck (talk) 20:04, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Boersmanogram[edit]

I'll start at the beginning of the story. At school our chemistry teacher had invent a methode, sorry my englisch is terrible so i will go on with my story in Dutch and then i'll use google translate.

Op school heeft mijn docent scheikunde, meneer Boersma, een methode bedacht om makkelijk in een tekening te zetten hoe je een in zout oplossingen stoffen aan kan te tonen of zelfs eruit kan te filtreren. Het fijne van deze methode is dat je met deze methode op je toets ook makkelijk de stof kan achterhalen. Onze docent maakte de grap dat er eigenlijk een wikipedia pagina zou moeten zijn voor zijn methode, hij noemde het een Boersmanogram.

Helaas werd de pagina binnen 10 seconden verwijdert door de gebruiker Apdency met het argument vandalisme, terwijl je de pagina niet eens binnen 10 seconden kan lezen. Bovendien heeft niemand er last van als de pagina bestaat, terwijl alle leerlingen die lessen hebben van onze docent, meneer Boersma, er alleen maar profijt van zullen hebben. Bovendien als er een leerling is die dit onderwerp totaal niet snapt en deze pagina vindt zal hij het misschien wel begrijpen.

Dan als laatste: Alles was Copyright free, ik heb alle schematische tekeningen zelf gemaakt en er is dus geen copyright

IK hoop dat het snel wordt opgelost en dat de pagina gewoon weer bestaat.

English At school, my chemistry teacher, Mr. Boersma, devised a method to easily draw a picture of how to display or even filter out a salt solution. The great thing about this method is that with this method you can easily find the material on your test. Our teacher made the joke that there should actually be a wikipedia page for his method, he called it a Boersmanogram.

Unfortunately, the page was removed within 10 seconds by the user Apdency with the argument vandalism, while you can not even read the page within 10 seconds. Moreover, nobody is bothered by the fact that the page exists, while all pupils who have lessons from our teacher, Mr. Boersma, will only benefit from it. In addition, if there is a student who does not understand this topic at all and finds this page, he may understand it.

Then last: Everything was Copyright free, I made all the schematic drawings myself and there is no copyright

I hope it will be resolved quickly and that the page simply exists again. —GoodjobNL (talk) 20:13, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

English Wikipedia administrators have no power over nl.wp. You need to find the appropriate place to ask for restoration on the Dutch Wikipedia. (Apdency isn't an administrator on en.wp, and the named article has never been created in mainspace or draft space on en.wp.) —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:19, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Engelse Wikipedia-beheerders hebben geen macht over nl.wp. Je moet de juiste plaats vinden om restauratie op de Nederlandse Wikipedia te vragen. (Apdency is geen beheerder op en.wp en het genoemde artikel is nooit gemaakt in de hoofdruimte of conceptruimte op en.wp.) [machine translated, apologies if unintelligible] —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:22, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
@GoodjobNL:
Ook publiceert de Engelse Wikipedia geen origineel werk. De Nederlandse Wikipedia heeft mogelijk dezelfde regel.
Also, the English Wikipedia does not publish original work. The Dutch Wikipedia may have the same rule.
~Anachronist (talk) 00:58, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Template Un-Retired[edit]

Wish restoration of the template Un-Retired — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:E88D:8100:20A5:A204:8535:321B (talk) 07:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Take a look at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_April_6#Template:Un-retired and Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2009_April_8#Template:Un-retired. Without a reason for undeletion, or WP:DRV, this cannot be reversed. Template:Un-retired is also protected against re-creation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:19, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:FastCopy[edit]

This page was speedily deleted because it was the talk page of the deleted article. However, since the article was undeleted, this discussion page should be undeleted as well. —RekishiEJ (talk) 09:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

ankita parakh[edit]

I, Suhana Jaiswal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Suhana Jaiswal (talk) 15:10, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You will need solid references to progress this - such as newspaper stories. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:06, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Royville[edit]

I, Mutant5x, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Yusuf Balarabe Abdullahi (talk) 15:35, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:07, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Centre for Urban Design and Mental Health[edit]

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jacobk94 (talk) 17:45, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

User:SteveStrummer/Sandbox5[edit]

Userpage previously deleted by my own (author) request via G7); now seeking restoration for further use. —SteveStrummer (talk) 22:55, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Edeta[edit]

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) BenBenOcho (talk) 13:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:54, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Cosmo Sheldrake[edit]

I, Lewis.varrilly, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lewis.varrilly (talk) 18:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:53, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Seasideness[edit]

Requesting the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. – Uanfala (talk) 23:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:51, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Colin D. McGinn[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —ColinMcGinn (talk) 02:22, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

I wrote an informative article in sandbox about a real person, and I'm not sure why it got deleted....? Please help, Barek is not very nice to autistic children.

This is the article - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:ColinMcGinn/sandbox&action=edit&redlink=1

Please Barek, understand that autism is a struggle for everyday people. You may hate children, but please don't hate mine.

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion U5, which indicates a user page being used as a personal webpage, blog, or social media site. U5 deletions will not be restored here or anywhere else, though you may ask that its contents be emailed to you if you have an email address associated with your account. My interactions with Barek have been nothing but positive, and your presumptions of them are unacceptable. We do not host personal journals or advocacy pages. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:04, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
The reason it was deleted was that it was like a fan page. You can seriously attempt an article, but for the topic you selected I could not find any suitable sources online (eg newspapers). So perhaps an alternative topic is better for WP:Your first article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:20, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Weyl's tube formula[edit]

The topic appears to be notable. -- Taku (talk) 03:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

  •  Done some content will have to be written for this to progress though. If you want to keep it for years I suggest a move to userspace. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:48, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
I’m not sure what “suggest” is meant here. If you want to see a particular draft or an article to be expanded, it can be done by yourself or by asking other editors to do so (such as me). If this draft is in violation of some policy, I’m unaware of such a policy. If you’re personally asking me to do some particular edits as opposed to making a comment on policy matters, I have no problem. But it would help if you can tell me what edit you me to do (e.g., finding a reference). -- Taku (talk) 08:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Euler characteristic of an orbifold[edit]

The topic appears to be notable. -- Taku (talk) 03:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Please see the comment above (I don’t think anyone is opposing the expansion of the draft.) -- Taku (talk) 08:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:CloudLIMS[edit]

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 103.15.64.125 (talk) 05:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:41, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Mandovi Bridge.png[edit]

The picture is my own work and I own the copyright of the image, it has been clicked by me. —Donkey335 (talk) 09:20, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

The file is not deleted yet. @Donkey335: In that case you can grant a license. Please edit File:Mandovi Bridge.png and state how you came to own the copyright, did you take the photo yourself? When did you do that? What free license do you wish to grant? I recommend CC-BY-SA-3.0. What attribution do you want? (default is Donkey335). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:The_Oxford_Review_-_Journal[edit]

This was unfinished, I would like to finish the entry about the journal Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —platothefish (talk) 16:17, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:28, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

lifespan integration[edit]

« Lifespan Integration » which I created has been deleted. Can you give me the reasons of this deletion ? Thank you by advance for your reply. Regards, —Rome320 (talk) 16:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

@Rome320: No, you didn't create that page. It was created by Sanvinke (talk · contribs) and User talk:Sanvinke contains explanations of the deletion. Is that also your account? If so, you need to pick one and stick with it. Multiple accounts aren't allowed here except in special circumstances.
Not done. The article was deleted in accordance with WP:G11 (unambiguous promotion), and as such, it is ineligible for restoration by request. I recommend you start over in draft space or in your sandbox, and submit the article for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Chat Garcia Ramilo[edit]

I am afraid I went ahead of myself copying a part of an article without being aware of it. I request this article be restored so that I can work in fixing it so that it complies with Wikipedia policies. Thanks! —Leilita21 (talk) 17:39, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Merle_1910_Biplane_at_HP_Nielsens_shop.jpg[edit]

I selected the wrong licensing option at upload so it was deleted under WP:F6. This photo is from California in 1910, so it should be {{PD-US}}. —FLRdorothy (talk) 18:04, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

  • @FLRdorothy: was the picture published in 1910, or just taken then? If it wasn't published until after 1923 then it may still be copyrighted. See Wikipedia:Public domain for an exhaustive explanation. Same for the image below. If it is a free image you may want to consider uploading to Wikimedia Commons instead. Hut 8.5 18:41, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HP_Nielsen_in_his_biplane_1910.jpg[edit]

New user; I selected the wrong licensing option at upload so it was deleted under WP:F6. I cropped this from a photo taken in California in 1910, so the original work should be {{PD-US}} and I think this crop would be {{PD-Self}}. —FLRdorothy (talk) 18:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Andrea Lambert[edit]

(no text provided) Andrea Lambert (talk) 18:17, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Sara Lovell[edit]

I, Bandwiki23, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bandwiki23 (talk) 18:49, 22 January 2018 (UTC)