Page move-protected

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrator instructions

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G5 or G11 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

Contents

Recostudio1037[edit]

The following conclusion can be drawn from this passage in the encyclopaedia: Although the historian who wrote this passage does not seem to believe in the full sense that Islam is the religion of Allâhu ta'âlâ, he admits that it is a perfect religion, that it enjoined belief in one Allah, and that it made a civilized nation from the savage Arabs, and he specially praises and lauds our Prophet. huseyinhilmiisik.com huseyinhilmiisik.com

--Recostudio1037 (talk) 01:36, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

and then click the "Save page" button below —Recostudio1037 (talk) 01:36, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Not done Firstly the page is not deleted yet. Secondly the page is not in English, and thirdly it has an unsuitable name and no context as to what it is about. So it is unsuitable as an article. Perhaps you want this as a personal sandbox, and if so it can be moved for you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:52, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
To all of which I want to add that it isn't even an article. It's a single arbitrary paragraph copied from the German Wikipedia article on encyclopedias. Largoplazo (talk) 11:09, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Sometimes[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sometimes_I_can%27t_relate , this article was deleted within few hours after i created with A9 clause, but the article subject was credible and had 3-4 artists having wiki articles, so please let me know if A9 is applicable for the deletion. Please retrieve the article Populationindex (talk) 04:41, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

For speedy delete like this you should ask the deleter: Bbb23 (talk · contribs). So which of Eric Roberts T C Stallings, Téa Mckay, Jenn Gotzon, Dey Young, Rachel Hendrix, David Topp have articles? If you use the WP:Wikilink like this [[Eric Roberts]] you can see if the link is blue and it goes to the correct person. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Yi Gu[edit]

I, RichardYee, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. RichardYee (talk) 06:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ramesh Mehta (comedian)[edit]

I, Gazal world, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gazal world (talk) 09:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Annika Bruhns[edit]

I, MiMee, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MiMee (talk) 12:01, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

@MiMee: Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:17, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Alliance éthio-française of Dire Dawa[edit]

I, Nesrine.khelifi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nesrine.khelifi (talk) 14:04, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:59, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Alliance éthio-française of Dire Dawa[edit]

need to improve the article and then click the "Save page" button below —Nesrine.khelifi (talk) 14:07, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gennaro_Napolitano[edit]

I have a new draft that is correctly cited with official news articles. —MuaazShakeel (talk) 15:51, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Then I suggest you put it into Draft:Gennaro Napolitano. Social media, official sites and IMDB are insufficient. We need newspapers and magazines etc. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:36, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jane_Maree_Kitto_Andersson[edit]

I, Johan-fridell, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Johan-fridell (talk) 09:35, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:39, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Urška Arlič Gololičič[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Julia Dobry (talk) 09:37, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:41, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jane_Maree_Kitto_Andersson[edit]

We have now managed to gather a number of better sources in order to complete the article so it would be wonderful if it could be restored again. —Johan-fridell (talk) 09:37, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. OK no need to ask twice Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:41, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:MNI Targeted Media Inc.[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) IdaValloMorris (talk) 12:22, 21 June 2017 (UTC)


https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:MNI_Targeted_Media_Inc.&action=edit&redlink=1

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Wendel AE/sandbox[edit]

I, Wendel AE, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wendel AE (talk) 12:27, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Not done. This page was a blatant copyright violation of this pdf.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:39, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:University of Alberta Faculty of Arts[edit]

I, 142.244.40.27, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 142.244.40.27 (talk) 13:42, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Group[edit]

I, 2602:30A:2E01:4FB0:5CED:A64A:37B9:7368, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2602:30A:2E01:4FB0:5CED:A64A:37B9:7368 (talk) 15:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Retrovision[edit]

Although it was a "local event" it kick-started the entire Retro gaming movement in the UK and was unique of it's time —80.229.251.23 (talk) 16:32, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Pfenning, BizWest, Cue Ball, Budhoo, Omallur, NextGen, Fagan, and Chase[edit]

The following pages should be undeleted and restored to their former locations in the userspace. They were all moved to the mainspace by a user other than their creator then found to be unsuitable for the mainspace for reasons which would not apply in the userspace. The consensus at WP:UP/RFC2016 (B4) was If a userspace draft is moved to the mainspace by a user other than its author, then found to be unsuitable for the mainspace for reasons which wouldn't apply in the userspace, it should be returned to the userspace. See Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 229#Unicity Productions, Play It Strange Trust, and Hack n' Smack Celebrity... for a precedent. Pinging Graeme Bartlett who participated in the related discussion I started at WT:Requests for undeletion. Courtesy ping to the administrators who deleted the pages: David Gerard, Explicit (3), Iridescent, Kudpung, Lankiveil, and Malcolmxl5.

Proposed deletion:

Criterion for speedy deletion A7:

Articles for deletion:

— Godsy (TALKCONT) 21:55, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

@Godsy: As regards to David Fagan, I offered in my close to userify it if someone committed to working on it. Are you or the original article creator going to keep working on this one with a view to getting it to the mainspace eventually? Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC).
@Lankiveil: I have no plans to work on it at this time. I cannot speak for the creator, i.e. Ben.zarsky, who has been inactive since mid-2010. I'm here because the community overwhelmingly supported the restoration of pages to the userspace under these circumstances (their rationales can be read here; numerically it was ~23 in support and ~2 in opposition). — Godsy (TALKCONT) 23:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
In that case, I'm going to decline to restore an abandoned draft to user space unless there is some indication somewhere that it will be worked upon; a restoration would be pointless wonkery for the sake of process. No opinion on the other ones. Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:34, 21 June 2017 (UTC).
  • Decline Per Lankiveil. 1) Process wonkerei. 2) The Draft namespace is not webhost. 3) When the Draft namespace was created it was done to replace the incubator which had become a graveyard for abandoned articles. 'Draft' was not conceived to become another graveyard for perma-drafts. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:54, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
@Kudpung: Just to clarify, I'm requesting these be restored to their former locations in the userspace (as that is what the community decided was appropriate), not the draftspace. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 01:11, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Still process wonkery: neither Draft nor user sub pages are web hosts or repositories for abandoned work. You would need to demonstrate that 1) The creators have asked for a refund, 2) demonstrate very clearly that these users are intending to continue developing the articles, and 3.) demonstrate that these articles will stand a good chance of surviving AfD.
I see all that as just making work for yourself, and then unnecessary work for the admins who are gong to have to delete them all over again. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC).
@Kudpung: You deleted Government Higher Secondary School Omallur due it being put up for proposed deletion, while Lankiveil deleted David Fagan (educator) due to an articles for deletion discussion. Very different. Even after it has been deleted, anyone may have a PRODed article or file restored through a request for undeletion, Any page which has been deleted as a result of a proposed deletion will be undeleted upon request (unless there are other reasons for keeping it deleted, such as a copyright infringement), and An administrator may decide on their own to restore a page that has been deleted after a proposed deletion without having to make the request at Requests for undeletion. WP:PROD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 01:44, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
  • I have restored the ones deleted via prod, but I have not moved the pages. Move them to draft or userspace if you wish. Even better if you improve the articles. Note if the article was at AFD then my opinion is that the AFD forum can decide deletion or move back to userspace. Since I was a discussion participant I won't act more for the more controversial restores. But others can work on them if they wish. Certainly if creators want their pages back, or someone wants to improve the page then a restore can be justified. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
    • I moved the articles that were restored back to their former locations in the userspace as you said I could if I desired. Thanks, — Godsy (TALKCONT) 02:45, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
This procedural nonsense is exactly what Iead to my concerns about Godsy's behaviour. Expressing those concerns turned into him bashing me all over the site then to him hounding me repeatedly. If restored, each of these pages will need to be run through yet another deletion process for no good reason at all. I don't see Godsy working AfC or WikiProject WP:ABANDONED he is just adding to administrative load needlessly. Legacypac (talk) 02:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
I think that a third party who [moves someone else's abandoned userspace draft to the mainspace] should take responsibility for the page, and if it does not survive in the mainspace, should arrange for it to be returned to the user space rather than let it be deleted for reasons which would not apply in the userspace. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 03:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
User:Godsy, User:Legacypac, cut it out. Both of you. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:51, 22 June 2017 (UTC).

I just wanted to provide some context since he is pinging all these admins and posting links to this discussion. I'm not going to fight over it. Legacypac (talk) 15:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

I provided links to this discussion in a couple places for context when you started making mischaracterizing statements like "restored by Godsy and moved to WP:ABANDONED stale userspace ... Godsy evidently saw value in this page so submitting it to AfC for comments and potential approval." — Godsy (TALKCONT) 16:22, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Devin Mroz[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Myoldring (talk) 22:09, 21 June 2017 (UTC) please recheck IMDB for this actor. thanks you kindly

  • X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devin Mroz, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. IMDB is not counted as a reliable source for Wikipedia to show notability. More independent reliable references are needed to show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Media Rights Capital[edit]

Article of a notable company, deleted by User:Spartaz because it was apparently created by a sock of the banned user User:Benjiboi. Personally, I feel that it runs afoul of the criteria that the page must have not "substantial edits by others". A long-standing article should not be deleted only because of its association with one user. —ViperSnake151  Talk  00:58, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Creating Draft:Dorothy K. Burnham[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Kjorgen (talk) 11:05, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. (assuming you mean Draft:Dorothy K. Burnham.) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Tyk[edit]

I, AndrewMeola, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AndrewMeola (talk) 11:32, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:42, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

HIP Video Promo[edit]

Attempting to update page —2603:301B:408:F600:B9CC:A092:A173:BB46 (talk) 18:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. SoWhy 09:08, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Nazim hussain Pak/Z.H. Rehber[edit]

I want this page be undeleted because I am in need of its content —Sinner (talk) 04:44, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. No such page existed. Please check the link and request again. Also, please remember that per WP:SIG your signature should include your username in some form or another. Regards SoWhy 09:11, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
For your information, Nazim hussain Pak, if you just want to test what something looks like, you start a new draft and you can use the preview button. Then if you don't like it you can keep editing, and not save it. Then you won't have to ask for a deletion after a quick test. (I checked your contributions, and deleted contributions and I could not see anything on Z.H. Rehber either). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:41, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Show case of Uniti steer-by-wire system at the 2016 CeBit.jpg[edit]

OTRS agent: a ticket 2017061210010987 was received from the correct copyright holder which provides the appropriate free license release for this file. Could you kindly {{ping}} me when the restoration is complete? Cheers! —seb26 (talk) 13:32, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

2015 St. Francis Brooklyn Terriers men's soccer team[edit]

The 2015 team was nationally ranked by the NSCAA, thus meets notability. Additionally, I intend to further improve the article. —El Mayimbe (talk) 14:19, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Financial Fortitude Radio Show[edit]

I, Leaddog1969, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Leaddog1969 (talk) 16:21, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

I restored this for you last year and there was no improvement made. What work do you plan this time? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:31, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
@Leaddog1969: I am waiting for you to respond here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:59, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Obama bin laden[edit]

The redirect page was previously deleted as a hoax/vandalism, a blatant ad, and an attack page. However, consensus has changed. Per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 4#Obama Bin Laden, this page should redirect to Osama bin Laden. —George Ho (talk) 17:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

  • There's nothing stopping you from creating it. The two 2008 deletions were not redirects, one was a political rant and the other was a short article about a site selling T-shirts. The 2007 creation was by a vandal who redirected it to Barack Obama. Hut 8.5 20:08, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
    • Thanks. Created the page. --George Ho (talk) 20:46, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Jeremy Meeks[edit]

Article was deleted in 2014 via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Meeks, but has been revived recently. —Jax 0677 (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Not done Currently it is only been revived as redirect, and the other revisions have had serious issues. If it becomes a stable free standing article, then history could be restored for you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Jeremy Meeks (model)[edit]

Article was deleted in 2017 via speedy deletion without WP:AFD. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:14, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

  • I see you have consulted the deleting admin and straight out restore was declined, though userfication was offered. So if you want to turn this into a draft or a userspace draft, then we can do this for you, else you can go for a deletion review. However, to give a you a clue if it is worth starting all over, or building on what was there before, the total text on the deleted page said this: "Jeremy Meeks is an American model and former criminal. Meeks first came to prominence after his arrest in 2014, when his mug shot went viral due to his attractive physical appearance.[1] Meeks was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm.[2] Upon his release from prison in 2016, Meeks began a successful modeling career.[3][4][5]" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:48, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Doe Boy/Freebandz[edit]

I am Doe Boy's Brand/Marketing Manager, and was only half-way finished with the adding,deleting, and editing of my article that was not even live yet. I am requesting to get the article back to make necessary changes that also meet your guidelines in order to post and go live. Thank you. —Ben RBMG (talk) 02:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

  • The article itself was deleted as clear advertising which is not restored here; instead the best alternative would be to show what can be used for a non-primary article, without using any copypasted copyvio either. Relevant policy is WP:What Wikipedia is not. SwisterTwister talk 06:46, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Style of writing is different on Wikipedia as this is an encyclopedia. You will have to not be a marketer or brand manager if you want to contribute in the style needed here. Example of text that should not be included in Wikipedia articles includes "sharpen his craft " "garnered the intrerests" " and more." "countless " and "alledgely has been tied". Also text that says or suggests negative things about the person need to be individually referenced. I am commenting on User:Ben RBMG/sandbox, as that is what I think you want back. Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure applies in your case. If you think you can write an encyclopedia entry in a style for an enecyclopedia, and there are other writings out there to base a page on, you can start again in your sandbox. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

angatmakabago[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Acejabel (talk) 05:13, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Not done There was no claim of importance, which is why it was deleted with A7. If there are multiple independent and reliable references written about the blog, then you can start on a draft Draft:angatmakabago. But if no one else has written about the blog, then it is better to write about something else here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:52, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Allan McKay[edit]

I, V Chernysheva, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. V Chernysheva (talk) 08:00, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ELFIO[edit]

I, 85.250.138.4, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 85.250.138.4 (talk) 16:57, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

File:TommyOliverDinoThunder.jpg[edit]

I wanted this image restored because I believe it was unfairly deleted. I think it can still be useful for the article it came from and I believe it should be restored immediately. —Angelgreat (talk) 13:45, 24 June 2017 (CST) —Angelgreat (talk) 18:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Not done We already have File:DinoBlack.jpg, so we don't need another image there. Why do you think another unfree picture of the actor is needed? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Not done. (e/c) Hi Angelgreat. This image was not deleted unfairly. But I think you might mean that the image should not have been removed from the article it was used in – which removal was what resulted in its deletion as "orphaned". You need background on certain rules about fair use, and how it's interpreted here under the non-free content for the distinction I'm drawing to make sense.

Images that are not suitably-free of copyright restrictions can only be used here if they meet the non-free content criteria, which are a bit complex in letter and application. Some summary points here are that we can only use one fair use image for the same encyclopedic purpose, only in the article mainspace; the single image must stay in use to remain; and generally we cannot use fair use images at all of living persons because they are replaceable while the person is alive by someone taking a photograph. We also can't use any fair use image where there's a free equivalent. What happened here is that in this edit, User:NeoBatfreak removed the image you are here about, and replaced it with File:Tommy Oliver (Jason David Frank).jpg. Since that orphaned this image, it was properly deleted as unused after an eight day waiting period.

If the images were equivalent and there was no living person issue, and no free equivalent in existence, then the question would have been, was there a good basis to remove the old image and replace it with the new image, remembering that only one can be used; one had to be deleted?

But the problem here is that the image that was removed, and then deleted, would have had to be deleted anyway, if reviewed, as clearly failing the non-free content criteria on two grounds: because it was an image of a living person with no suitable exception to the rule I can see, and because there are free images of this person, at Commons:Category:Jason David Frank at the 2013 Wizard World New York Experience. The image that replaced this one has a much better claim to meeting an exception to the rules, because unlike this image, it is of him in the power suit, but I think the image that replaced it need to be deleted as well. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:11, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Muneer Abdul-Munim Al-Ali[edit]

Changes and further information are being added. I would say that introducing new innovative surgical procedure, and co-founding one of the international medical societies have to be indications of notability for any doctor —Widmun (talk) 21:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muneer Abdul-Munim Al-Ali, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. I have also deleted the re-creation of the page. LinkedIn is the place to write about a person's career. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:15, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:T.A._Talbott[edit]

I intend to fix the problems that caused the denial; delay was due to inattention to page actions; —Sdowler (talk) 21:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. References are needed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:17, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Elliot Leung addresses the press during the Shenzhen Arts Festival.jpg[edit]

OTRS agent: a ticket 2017052510014415 was received which alleges permission for this file under a free license. Could you kindly {{ping}} me when done so I can investigate it? Cheers! —seb26 (talk) 00:00, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done @Seb26: note that we cannot put on a genuine OTRS permission ticket. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Surrogate mother and child.jpg[edit]

OTRS agent: a ticket 2017052310001978 was received which alleges permission for this file under a free license. Could you kindly {{ping}} me when done so I can investigate it? Cheers! seb26 (talk) 00:18, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done @Seb26: note that we cannot put on a genuine OTRS permission ticket, so please update the files permission. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Waldon Approach[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Pondswimmer (talk) 09:01, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Although it was stated that the article had not been updated for 6 months I had updated the request for revision of the reference section about two months ago and had not received any further review

I notice that Draft:The Waldon Approach has not been deleted. EricEnfermero (Talk) 09:06, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Global Reports on Adult Learning and Education (GRALE)[edit]

Seems to have been prodded without proper consideration of alternatives to deletion. WP:CONTESTED states "Any page which has been deleted as a result of a proposed deletion will be undeleted upon request". —Andrew D. (talk) 09:15, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I should point out that in its current form the article is entirely taken from a UNESCO report and would need serious work to bring it up to scratch. Hut 8.5 13:57, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Dee Dee Chan[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Harrywind (talk) 15:22, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Nippon Bearing Co. Ltd.[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Marvinwest (talk) 14:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:55, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

CPC character set[edit]

Non-notable, should becomes notable if needs more sources —Rowan03 (talk) 21:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Please write more introduction as well as adding references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:57, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

ELOT 927[edit]

Non-notable, should notable to match ELOT 928/ISO 8859-7 —Rowan03 (talk) 22:20, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

NEC APC character set[edit]

non-notable, needs additional sources —Rowan03 (talk) 23:49, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Bubbyism[edit]

Page Was Deleted —DesertedProject (talk) 02:41, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

$1000 (disambiguation)[edit]

I'd made this and the following two redirects in error as I'm trying to use a userscript to speed up disambiguating links. I'd tried using it on the target of this redirect as well as those of the two listed below, only to find nothing to apply it to. I thought nothing of it and left, but somehow the script created these redirects in the process. I had them deleted under WP:G7, but now I'm told having pages like these is the standard practice per WP:INTDAB. I apologize for giving people the runaround here. —Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:51, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

2K14 (disambiguation)[edit]

Please see previous —Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:51, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

2K16 (disambiguation)[edit]

Please see previous —Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:53, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

File:MTV Canada logo.svg[edit]

This was a logo for MTV (Canada) between 2006 to 2012. It had NO "Music Television" tagline, as licence reason. However someone replaced them with File:MTV Logo.svg that had tagline. —John123521 (Talk-Contib.) RA 09:57, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done Please use it and remove count down to delete if you do. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:55, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Largest patent settlements[edit]

I, Mattojgb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mattojgb (talk) 10:07, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC)