Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/January/22

January 22[edit]

Cat:European singer stubs[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Upmerge all (other than the ones removed from the discussion) as undersized. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:00, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deletion of the following categories. Suggest double upmerging to Cat:European singer stubs and the appropriate national category indicated.

Cat:Bulgarian singer stubs (12 articles), upmerge to Cat:Bulgarian people stubs
- Related: propose double-upmerging Cat:Bulgarian musician stubs (12 articles) to Cat:Bulgarian people stubs and Cat:European musician stubs
Cat:Czech singer stubs (34 articles), upmerge to Cat:Czech musician stubs
~~Cat:Greek singer stubs (41 articles), upmerge to Cat:Greek musician stubs (now 60 stubs)~~
Cat:Hungarian singer stubs (24 articles), upmerge to Cat:Hungarian musician stubs
~~Cat:Irish singer stubs (42 articles), upmerge to Cat:Irish musician stubs (now 60 stubs)~~
Cat:Moldovan singer stubs (8 articles), upmerge to Cat:Moldovan people stubs
Cat:Romanian singer stubs (33 articles), upmerge to Cat:Romanian musician stubs
Cat:Swiss singer stubs (32 articles), upmerge to Cat:Swiss musician stubs

Dawynn (talk) 13:15, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support, assuming that they can't be brought up to threshold. I'd suggest trying to get some of them to 60 first though. Grutness...wha? 22:14, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There seems to be quite some undersorting - I managed to get the Irish one to 60 stubs using cat scan. Grutness...wha? 22:35, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - The Greek one is also now at 60 stubs, but it was a push to get it there. Unless there's serious undersorting, the others are unlikely to get to threshold, I'd say. Grutness...wha? 23:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.