Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/July/10
July 10[edit]
{{Non-Alcoholic Beverage-stub}}[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was rename template, create category - note, may need upmerging later if insufficient stubs are found
Unproposed, unused, non-standard-named template, already covered by several different stub types. Unnecessary. Delete. Grutness...wha? 03:46, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename. Although I'm not sure what to rename it to. Under Cat:Drink stubs, I see Cat:soft drink stubs, Cat:coffee stubs, and Cat:tea stubs. I wouldn't say this covers everything. I realize that the following list surely contains non-stub articles, but these are just examples to spur thinking. Where would we classify water, milk, hot chocolate, or even "virgin" variations of alcoholic beverages? How about some of these (pulled from the stub list): Celtic (water), Cacolac, EJ-10, and Emerge Stimulation Drink? The current template is nonstandard and deserves a rename, but I don't agree that the topic is already covered. Dawynn (talk) 18:06, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Makes sense... so that would be what? {{Nonalcoholic-drink-stub}}/Cat:Non-alcoholic beverage stubs? With things like Cat:Soft drink stubs as subtypes? Grutness...wha? 01:33, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
South Sudan[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was rename both to "SouthSudan-"
While we've been busy discussing new stub types for this new country at WP:WSS/P , unsurprisingly, a couple of unproposed types have sprung up:
{{South Sudan-ethno-group-stub}}[edit]
Unproposed, convention non-compliant name. Has a large number of stubs, but the template needs to be fixed to the standard {{SouthSudan-ethno-group-stub}}. Rename (deleting the current name). See also the proposal below on ethnicity categories. Grutness...wha? 03:46, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This seems uncontroversial. I suggest a move first, then work through the stubs changing the name, then delete the current name. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:08, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
{{South-Sudan-sports-venue-stub}}[edit]
Unproposed and misnamed - the name chosen makes it appear that this template is for venues in the South of the nation of Sudan (the hyphen makes it a subtype of Sudan-sports-venue-stubs), whereas the implication is definitely that this is for stubs in the nation of South Sudan. At the very least this needs renaming to {{SouthSudan-sports-venue-stub}}, assuming it's even needed yet. Given that there's been no discussion yet of even a SouthSudan-sports-stub or a SouthSudan-struct-stub, it's a bit premature, to say the least. Also, this sorts stubs into Cat:North African sports venue stubs; politically, South Sudan may yet more logically be considered part of East Africa, though that may have to wait for the UN to catch up... Rename at a minimum (deleting the current name), though second choice would be delete. Grutness...wha? 03:46, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
Ethnic groups[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was rename
While looking at one of the above stub types I noticed a mismatch in WP:WSS naming: We use "ethnicity" for categories that should logically be "ethnic group" categories. I propose renaming the following:
- Cat:Indian ethnicity stubs → Cat:Indian ethnic group stubs
- Cat:Pakistani ethnicity stubs → Cat:Pakistani ethnic group stubs
- Cat:South Sudanese ethnicity stubs → Cat:South Sudanese ethnic group stubs
- Cat:Sudanese ethnicity stubs → Cat:Sudanese ethnic group stubs
- Cat:Tanzanian ethnicity stubs → Cat:Tanzanian ethnic group stubs
Grutness...wha? 03:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
Antarctica[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete/upmerge per nom
After a lot of work, the East and West antarctica geo-stub types are empty, all subsorted into regions. At the moment, the only free stubs in either the east or west category are 12 articles stubbed with the upmerged {{KaiserWilhelmIILand-geo-stub}}, and one East Antarctica stub. These could easily be accommodated int he main Cat:Antarctica geography stubs category, which is itself currently empty except for subcategories. As such, I'd like to propose the following:
- Deletion of Cat:West Antarctica geography stubs and Cat:East Antarctica geography stubs
- Turning {{EAntarctica-geo-stub}} and {{WAntarctica-geo-stub}} into redirects to {{Antarctica-geo-stub}}.
Grutness...wha? 03:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.