Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 August 31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 31

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:53, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AMGcite (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in four articles. Redundant to {{cite web}}. PC78 (talk) 23:18, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Full House season 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unlikely to be used since the individual episodes do not have individual articles. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:09, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per nominator: more than 2/3rds of the articles are red linked, and the others are redirects to List of Full House episodes. Battleaxe9872 Talk 23:13, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AMG Artist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only 67 No transclusions, redundant to and replaceable with the much more widely used {{Allmusic}}. {{AMG Artist}} has different parameter names, but for the sake of so few transclusions it's probably not worth the bother of adding them to the other template. A straightforward replace and delete should suffice. PC78 (talk) 21:57, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was  Relisted on Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_September_9#September_9. Ruslik_Zero 16:12, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uniform polyhedra navigator (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Polyhedra pages are awash with templates and we don't need yet another one. This one is curious in that its implying some sort of sequence to the polyhedron and the rational behind this ordering is not obvious. Salix (talk): 21:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:54, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Edmonton Oilers staff (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A template full of non-notable people. Is there really a reason for this template other than a collection of every single employee for the Oilers? Probably not. Much more of a fancruft template than anything else, and does not contribute to the quality of any article, nor do much to inform of anything but random employees working for a professional team. The team is noteworthy; not the mostly non-notable staff. Jmlk17 20:29, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Close. The author was not notified. Ruslik_Zero 16:01, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Transport by country (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant, many handmade links, Template:Asia topic, Template:Europe topic, Template:Africa topic etc are better to handle this. TruckCard (talk) 12:20, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete all. Ruslik_Zero 16:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kansas state footballseasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Kansas State football seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:KansasStateWildcatsfootballseasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Kansas State Wildcats football seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All are unused, and redundant to various parts of Template:KansasStatefootball, these may even fit the criteria for Speedy Deletion. EmanWilm (talk) 04:37, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.