Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 December 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 10

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:49, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ustatus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This appears to be currently pointless, since the bot that updates the status is not active. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 00:34, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:22, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ivy League MLB All-Stars (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This seems unnecessary to me. There is no page for List of Ivy League Major League Baseball All-Stars, and nor should there be. Why do we have to link these six individuals together based on a coincidence? Muboshgu (talk) 19:53, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this. --Muboshgu (talk) 03:15, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:46, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Supervisedpage (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Pagealsosupervised (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used on failed proposal at Wikipedia:Experimental vandalism protection. Substitute and then delete. WOSlinker (talk) 19:44, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Aaron Schulz 21:54, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 06:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Differences between turtles, tortoises and terrapins (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused since February 2010. Former templatification of article text. The three articles now read differently, to focus on each term in particular. oknazevad (talk) 19:17, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 06:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Arab-African Super Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template with no blue links for a never-played competition whose own article was recently deleted. Alzarian16 (talk) 15:00, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete, given the sheer size of the category. If someone wants to create a more targeted version, perhaps as a footer navigation box, go right ahead. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:54, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Humanities (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template's subject matter is bound to be unwieldy. Everything related to history and politics in a sub-heading? Everything in the visual and performing arts? A third of Wikipedia would end up with this on it. It will not be an aid to navigation. RJC TalkContribs 14:47, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete. Humanities is a broad concept, but important in discussions on education and funding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.75.0 (talk) 17:44, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restructure. A simplified box would be acceptable, one that only contained links to the main articles it presents as top categories: law, visual- and performing arts, literature, history and politics and philosophy and religion and no more. Trying to fit in all undercategories will indeed eventually bloat the thing beyond any useful purpose. --Saddhiyama (talk) 13:51, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - far too broad to be covered in a single navigational template. Suitable as a category (Category:Humanities), where readers can browse the subcategories, but not as a template. Robofish (talk) 22:02, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per G7. Mhiji (talk) 15:38, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FIFA World Cup 2022 Qualifiers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Way too early to have a template for the qualification to an event which will occur in 2022, see also WP:CRYSTAL. Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 14:29, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 06:39, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Round Maple (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Round maple is a tiny hamlet of dubious notability in itself. The buildings and woods listed on this template are also not notable, and only redirect to the main article. Serves no purpose whatsoever. Quantpole (talk) 12:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 06:38, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Johnny Depp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No other actor has a navbox that is dumped on every article of films they star in. I think this is a little too much... —Mike Allen 01:42, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.