Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 December 14

< December 13	December 15 >

December 14[edit]

Template:CIA trans ref[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:38, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CIA trans ref (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Now unused. Previously extremely specific and limited in use, and only ever used at List of flags of convenience. Wikiacc (¶) 07:00, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Video game engines[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete, but some consensus to reduce the number of entries. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Video game engines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is essentially a template that lists the articles in the category. In my opinion, they are not linked closely enough that they should have a nav template between them - but if they do, WP:NAV suggests using the self-populating {{otherarticles}} template instead. I think that is a better fit here. Addionne (talk) 15:54, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is not just a copy of the category, but a list of distinction between FOSS and non-FOSS software, as plenty of other FOSS/non-FOSS aggregation templates exist for other software classifications. --Toussaint (talk) 06:08, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 09:19, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TFD tag added. 134.253.26.9 (talk) 18:42, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JPG-GR (talk) 06:56, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KeepIt's going over VG engines as a whole, and I realy don't think you can classify VG engines more specifically than just "Video game engines" without upsetting some people, even the FPS engine article is a long shot. It may be a smidgen redunant but nothing that disrupts Wikipedia. Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 17:56, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the template, and delete the substandard articles that are causing the template to become overgrown with links to obscure and non-notable software. Ham Pastrami (talk) 06:15, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Patton tank navigation[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:00, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Patton tank navigation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

See WP:Articles for deletion/Patton tank.The Patton tanks have little in common. Just sharing the namesake of Patton does not make them part of a family. Tanks of the U.S. in the Cold War covers the same topic. Marcus Qwertyus 19:44, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

keep. That's a rather blinkered view. From an operational or strategic view, they have everything in common, fulfilling the same role. The US Army considered this a series of Main Battle Tanks, else why would they have given them a common name? And that list article cannot replace this in-page navigation template. —Michael Z. 2010-12-06 21:55 z
~~Weak keep~~. Moderately useful template, I think - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 23:12, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete if the outcome of the AfD is to convert or redirect Patton tank. --Bsherr (talk) 02:49, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome of Patton tank AfD is convert to disambiguation page. Still waiting for close. Marcus Qwertyus 14:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Change to Delete. Existing US tank tenplate and Patton disambig page are sufficent. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SA Parliament by Province[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:00, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SA Parliament by Province (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox template that is not used anywhere. Very little likelihood that it will be used anywhere, given that all the links are red. htonl (talk) 02:01, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:REDNOT, it's useless and unused. Mhiji (talk) 02:37, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Range map[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:35, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Range map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Red link Mhiji (talk) 01:00, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NorthstarHiawathaCentral[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep Mhiji (talk) 12:30, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NorthstarHiawathaCentral (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Mhiji (talk) 01:00, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep used on Twin Cities Rail Transport. Them From Space 10:48, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as now used. Mhiji (talk) 12:30, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sci Class P[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:29, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sci Class P (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Mhiji (talk) 00:59, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete superceded by Template:Taxobox. Them From Space 10:51, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Random selection1[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:29, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Random selection1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Mhiji (talk) 00:59, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not sure what this was intended for. Them From Space 11:03, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NorthstarLine[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:27, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NorthstarLine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Red links Mhiji (talk) 00:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete superceded by Template:Northstar Corridor. Them From Space 10:57, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Northern Province, Sri Lanka topics[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:59, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Northern Province, Sri Lanka topics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Red links Mhiji (talk) 00:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NoCoins[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Mhiji (talk) 14:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NoCoins (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Mhiji (talk) 00:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. That this template is unused is a good sign that images do not use currency for size comparisons. As users upload images that do so, this tag is added to the image description. See the related category, Category:Images with coins to indicate scale; "Administrators: Please do not delete this category even if it is empty! Categories with this message may be empty occasionally or even most of the time." --Geniac (talk) 01:29, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry I didn't realise this. Keep per Geniac. Mhiji (talk) 14:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NCAA Team[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:58, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NCAA Team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Red link Mhiji (talk) 00:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Legal codes of Thailand[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:57, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Legal codes of Thailand (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Red links Mhiji (talk) 00:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Kanchipuram district[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Mhiji (talk) 04:41, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kanchipuram district (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Mhiji (talk) 00:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but after some copyedits and adding it to some articles. This is one of a collection in Category:Tamil Nadu district templates. 134.253.26.10 (talk) 16:51, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, one of the most ridiculous reasons to tag a template for deletion. If you are doing this on behalf of someone else to make me quit Wikipedia, then let me tell you this - I've already reducing my Wiki-ing habits. I've a few goals in mind and once they are over, I'll be quitting. Regards.-The Enforcer _{Office of the secret service} 13:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Now it is being used. And it is a perfectly valid navigational template.--Sodabottle (talk) 13:33, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, keep as now used. Mhiji (talk) 04:41, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox i Science Inc.,[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per nom. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox i Science Inc., (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Pointless! Mhiji (talk) 00:56, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete, per nom. Creating user was the now-blocked Iscience. Code is also invalid as it tries to input an image directly from another website. --vgmddg (look | talk | do) 23:23, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AFL (2010) Labelled Map[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted per G7

Template:AFL (2010) Labelled Map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Red link Mhiji (talk) 00:56, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete: I just tagged it under G7 as the creator. Tampabay721 (talk) 02:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:BAB-Nr[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:53, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BAB-Nr (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Red link Mhiji (talk) 00:56, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The German version is also an orphan. 134.253.26.10 (talk) 16:43, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Autostrada-it[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Mhiji (talk) 01:12, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Autostrada-it (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

~~Unused. Red link~~ Mhiji (talk) 00:56, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose it shouldn't be in direct use. It's designed that way. The concept is that this template is a copy of the corresponding infobox on the Italian Wikipedia. If an Italian editor wants to translate an article from there to here, they can copy and paste the infobox out of the Italian Wikipedia article, and then substitute the infobox. The result is that this template converts the Italian code into the English Wikipedia's {{infobox road}} for output. Do some cleanup, finish translating the article to English and, voilà, we have another Italian autostrada article ready. Imzadi 1979 → 01:03, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, hadn't realised this is a subst'd template. Keep. Mhiji (talk) 01:12, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rank insignia OF[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:19, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rank insignia OF (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Red links Mhiji (talk) 00:54, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Appears to be malformatted as well and there would be better ways to present the information (ie: Template:Late Ottoman military ranks). Them From Space 10:45, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TuteinPairsHand[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:56, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TuteinPairsHand (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Red links Mhiji (talk) 00:53, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Recording Artist Lugo[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:45, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Recording Artist Lugo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Red links Mhiji (talk) 00:53, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Saints Football kit[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:56, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Saints Football kit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Red links Mhiji (talk) 00:52, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Former countries in India[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:18, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Former countries in India (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Mhiji (talk) 00:52, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Werdnabot-archivenum[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:55, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Werdnabot-archivenum (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Mhiji (talk) 00:48, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Surajpur district, Chhattisgarh[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:44, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Surajpur district, Chhattisgarh (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Not a template. Mhiji (talk) 00:45, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as a copy of Surguja district. 134.253.26.10 (talk) 16:45, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.