Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 November 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 17

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:100% (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:80% (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:85% (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:90% (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:95% (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:105% (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:110% (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:115% (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:120% (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:150% (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

{{100%}} outputs <span style="font-size:100%;>[...]</span>, which is the equevilent of "do nothing with the font size". Therefor completely useless. Also, ambiguous, generic naming for all other templates. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 09:55, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2. Should the other resizing convenience templates listed here also therefore be replaced/deleted..?
Sardanaphalus (talk) 11:27, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Addendum. I missed that this was still in open discussions, and I goofed up by closing prematurely. However, since the template is unused, and the author has no other plans with it, I'd like to keep this close, even if it is out of process. If anyone has objections to that, feel free to undo this close, and ask for undeletion (by me, or anyone else). No need to go by me first or any of that red tape. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:16, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cross out (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a newly created, yet unused, template to cross out words using <s>...</s>. I see two problems with this. It is redundant to html tags s and del, and the documentation also mentions problems where <nowiki>...</nowiki> tags are needed. I may have fixed the latter problem with this edit, but I'm not really sure what template errors the documentation is talking about. —PC-XT+ 07:35, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:29, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Coding (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused except for two transclusions on historical BOTREQ pages, where it appears the user wanted {{BOTREQ|coding}} instead. I'm not sure having a cleanup template referring to markup is a good idea in the first place; if someone is going to the effort of applying such a template, they may as well run the page through one of the many automatic-cleanup gadgets that are available, and spend a few seconds double-checking... Reticulated Spline (tc) 00:43, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.