Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 February 8

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 7 February 9 >

February 8[edit]

Template:PD-Coa-Germany[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 18:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 22:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here. Frietjes (talk) 13:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-CA-State-Capitol-Museum[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 18:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused copyright tag. Any future uploads under this license belong at Commons. FASTILY 22:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, if it's PD, it should be uploaded to commons directly, hence, this is not needed here. Frietjes (talk) 13:12, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hotels in Benin[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 18:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

this template is just a directory of red links. Rather than the purpose of a template to link to multiple other articles in a topic. It contains only 2 articles, one of which is up for deletion. LibStar (talk) 16:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Template is almost exclusively populated of red-links. Only two remaining (one of which is nominated for deletion). Ajf773 (talk) 20:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, already covered by a category. if we really need the list, we should create a list article instead. Frietjes (talk) 13:12, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Indefblockedipbecause[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 February 18. Primefac (talk) 00:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zambian Secretary Generals[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

only used on one page and no parent article. we could link the top to List of Zambian presidents and their deputies, and add it to the transcluding articles. but currently, it's pointless. Frietjes (talk) 13:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikilivres[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 February 18. Primefac (talk) 00:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vet[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 19:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, mostly duplicates functionality of {{Navbar}} — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 05:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete or redirect per {{vte}}. Frietjes (talk) 13:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • But, but, how are you ever going to make Frietjes without Vet? (Sorry, couldn't resist). Fram (talk) 13:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • Fram, can you believe that some people try to make them without it? baked fries shouldn't be called fries, no matter what it does for your health, it's just wrong. Frietjes (talk) 13:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Please leave this line alone (Tharindu Lakshan)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Primefac (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Useless. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 03:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as test page. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 05:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_February_8&oldid=1074062621"