Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 September 19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 19

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No oppose (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 13:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Only has a single linked entry. Fails its sole purpose as a helpful navbox. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 19:46, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Deprecate old template (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:03, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deprecating Template:RankedMedalTable, Template:RankedMedalRow & Template:RankedMedalFooter in favor of Template:Medals table.
I have just completed {{Medals table}} which accomplishes what {{RankedMedalTable}}, {{RankedMedalRow}} and {{RankedMedalFooter}} do but in one template. Rank is automatically calculated as are the totals for each nation. I guarantee that there is room for improvement with {{Medals table}} and welcome any and all feedback. My proposal is to deprecate the use of these three templates in favor of using the new one. I don't think this is technically a case for merging, but want to get the discussion started. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:19, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 21:46, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to Template:Road infrastructure in Brisbane. This was always rather redundant anyway but now this template has been fully integrated into that one. No other Australian capital city has an equivalent template - hence why I merged them. No transclusions. Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 13:02, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 October 1. Primefac (talk) 00:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:08, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a navbox containing players in a rugby union squad. However, none of the players have an article, all the links are red links. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 04:18, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 October 1. Primefac (talk) 00:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 28. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:09, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 28. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:09, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).