Wikipedia:WikiProject Bavaria/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the assessment department of the WikiProject Bavaria! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Bavaria-related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Bavaria}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Bavaria articles by quality and Category:Bavaria articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the WikiProject Bavaria is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

Quality assessments[edit]

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:Bavaria articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the MunichImp parameter in the {{WikiProject Bavaria}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Bavaria|Importance=???|Class=???}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale[edit]

Label Criteria Examples
Top Core topics about Bavaria. Generally, these topics are sub-articles of the main Bavaria article, vital for the understanding of Bavaria or extremely notable to people outside of Bavaria. This category should stay limited to approximately 100 members. Biographies should be limited to the top one or two people from Munich in a particular field or persons of the greatest historical importance Bavaria
Kingdom of Bavaria
History of Bavaria
High Topics that are very notable within Bavaria, and not unheard of outside of it, and can be reasonably expected to be included in any print encyclopedia War of the Bavarian Succession
Mid Topics that are reasonably notable on a national level within Germany without necessarily being famous or very notable internationally Middle Franconia
Low Topics of mostly local interest or those that are only included for complete coverage or as examples of a higher-level topic; peripheral or trivial topics Hermann Detzner

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.


Assessment log[edit]

Bavaria articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

August 25, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 22, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 18, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 12, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 31, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 21, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 20, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 19, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 17, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 14, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 12, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 11, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 6, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 2, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • EV Landshut (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • Straubing Tigers (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 12, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 9, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 8, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 7, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 6, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 29, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 26, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Brotzeit (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

May 23, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 21, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 13, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 2, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Gauchsbach (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

  • Kleine Vils (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

April 29, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Plattling Black Hawks (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

April 27, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • München RFC (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

April 25, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Aiterach (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

April 22, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 18, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 16, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 15, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 12, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 9, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 28, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 23, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 6, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Mitwitz (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

March 4, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

February 25, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 20, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 19, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 6, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Inzell (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

February 3, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 23, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 18, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 17, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 15, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 14, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 13, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Nuremberg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as High-Class (rev · t).

January 12, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Esselbach (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

December 26, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 25, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Sugenheim (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

December 19, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 14, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 11, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 28, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Bavarian Open (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

November 24, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 15, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

November 15, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

November 10, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 5, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 2, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Oktoberfest (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to High-Class (rev · t).

October 29, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • FC Coburg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

October 28, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • DVV Coburg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

October 22, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 21, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 18, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 10, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 9, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 5, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 3, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Burgkunstadt (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

October 1, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 29, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 28, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 24, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 22, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 21, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 20, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 13, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 12, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 11, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 9, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 8, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 7, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 6, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 5, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 4, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • TSV Roth (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

September 3, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]