Wikipedia:WikiProject Bavaria/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the assessment department of the WikiProject Bavaria! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Bavaria-related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Bavaria}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Bavaria articles by quality and Category:Bavaria articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the WikiProject Bavaria is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

Quality assessments[edit]

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:Bavaria articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the MunichImp parameter in the {{WikiProject Bavaria}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Bavaria|Importance=???|Class=???}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale[edit]

Label Criteria Examples
Top Core topics about Bavaria. Generally, these topics are sub-articles of the main Bavaria article, vital for the understanding of Bavaria or extremely notable to people outside of Bavaria. This category should stay limited to approximately 100 members. Biographies should be limited to the top one or two people from Munich in a particular field or persons of the greatest historical importance Bavaria
Kingdom of Bavaria
History of Bavaria
High Topics that are very notable within Bavaria, and not unheard of outside of it, and can be reasonably expected to be included in any print encyclopedia War of the Bavarian Succession
Mid Topics that are reasonably notable on a national level within Germany without necessarily being famous or very notable internationally Middle Franconia
Low Topics of mostly local interest or those that are only included for complete coverage or as examples of a higher-level topic; peripheral or trivial topics Hermann Detzner

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.


Assessment log[edit]

Bavaria articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

August 25, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Maxberg specimen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to NA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

August 24, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Fabian Benko (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

August 22, 2016[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Fabian Benko (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

August 19, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 15, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 10, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 6, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • David Elsner (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

August 4, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 1, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 29, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 28, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Franconia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from High-Class to Top-Class (rev · t).

July 26, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 24, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 22, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 21, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 19, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 18, 2016[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 16, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 15, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Ernst Röhm (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

July 12, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 8, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 6, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 5, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Battle of Hiltersried (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

July 3, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 2, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 1, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 29, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 28, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 27, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 25, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • David Elsner (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • ERC Ingolstadt (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • EV Füssen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • EV Landshut (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Konrad von Thüngen (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

June 24, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 21, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 19, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 18, 2016[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 17, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 14, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 12, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 10, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 7, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 4, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 1, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 30, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 27, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 25, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]