Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian history/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Welcome to the assessment department of the Christian History WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Christian History related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Christian History}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories ofCategory:Christian History articles by quality and Category:Christian History articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Christian History WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Staff[edit]


Instructions[edit]

Statistics[edit]

Index · Statistics · Log

Quality assessments[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Christian History}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Christian History|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Christian History articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Christian History articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Christian History articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Christian History articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Christian History articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Christian History articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Christian History articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Christian History articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Christian History articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Book (for Wikipedia books; adds pages to Category:Book-Class Christian History articles) Wikipedia Book Book 
Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Christian History articles) Category page Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Christian History articles) Disambiguation page Disambig 
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Christian History articles)  File 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Christian History articles)  Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Christian History articles)  Project 
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Christian History articles)  Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Christian History articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Christian History articles)  ??? 

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:Christian History articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Christian History}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Christian History| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale[edit]

Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Top The article is one of the core topics about Christian History. Articles in this area should be limited to those which could, reasonably, be found in any encyclopedia regarding Christian History. A reader who is not involved in the field of Christian History will have high familiarity with the subject matter and should be able to relate to the topic easily. Articles in this importance range are written in mostly generic terms, leaving technical terms and descriptions for more specialized pages. Christian History
High The article covers a topic that contributes a depth of knowledge regarding Christian History.
Mid The article covers a topic that is important to at least one field within the broad field of Christian History, and that contributes relevant details regarding the subject. Many readers will be familiar with the topic being discussed, but a larger majority of readers may have only cursory knowledge of the overall subject. Articles at this level will cover subjects that are well known but not necessarily vital to understand Christian History. Due to the topics covered at this level, Mid-importance articles will generally have more technical terms used in the article text. Most people whose involvement with Christian History in general has been of such impact that a broad understanding of Christian History is not possible without some knowledge of them will be rated in this level.
Low The article is not required knowledge for a broad understanding of Christian History. Few readers outside the Christian History field may be familiar with the subject matter. It is likely that the reader does not know anything at all about the subject before reading the article. Articles at this range of importance will often delve into the minutiae of Christian History, using technical terms (and defining them) as needed. Topics included at this level include most practices and infrastructure of Christian History. Armageddon

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Requested Assessments[edit]

Assessment log[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

April 20, 2018[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 14, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 27, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 21, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 12, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 23, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 20, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 22, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 26, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 15, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 26, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Majorinus (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 25, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Saint Venera (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Top-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

September 24, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Saint Venera (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).

August 20, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Judith Maltby (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

August 6, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 5, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 28, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Judith Maltby (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

June 24, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 23, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 16, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 13, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Anna Ecklund (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

May 9, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 3, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Anna Ecklund (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

April 25, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 1, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 5, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 2, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

December 30, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 8, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 24, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 25, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 19, 2016[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Johann Wild (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

July 18, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Johann Wild (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

June 30, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 28, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 8, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 19, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 14, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 9, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

March 1, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 25, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 12, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Archibald Main (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

February 6, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 21, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 12, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 6, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 3, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 1, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 29, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 11, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Hippo Regius (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).

December 9, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 20, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 15, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 14, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 7, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 6, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 27, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Archibald Main (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

October 16, 2015[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 13, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 13, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 2, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Bernard d'Anduze (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

July 2, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 12, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 29, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 2, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 23, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 25, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 24, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 16, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 14, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 21, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 14, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 30, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 24, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 22, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 15, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 15, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 6, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 23, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 20, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 12, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 11, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]