Wikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive science/Assessment
This is the WikiProject Cognitive science assessment summary page. See WP:1.0 and WP:WVWP for more information. For Cognitive science articles, see Category:Cognitive science or Category:Cognitive science lists.
The quality assessments are mainly performed by members of WikiProjects, who tag talk pages of articles. These tags are then collected by a bot, which then generates output such as a table, log and statistics. For more information see Using the bot.
Note that when more than one WikiProject has rated an article, the bot will take the best rating as the rating of the overall article. The WP:1.0 team is now setting up to use a second bot to select articles, based on the assessments performed by WikiProjects.
Two levels, GA and FA, are assessments made by external panels, rather than by Wikiprojects. Candidates are nominated by listing them at Good article candidates and Featured article candidates. Judgments are made according to the criteria at What is a good article? and Featured article criteria, and the results are listed at Good articles and Featured articles.
It is vital that people do not take these assessments personally. It is understood that we each have our own opinions of the priorities of the objective criteria for a perfect article. Generally an active project will develop a consensus, though be aware that different projects may use their own variation of the criteria more tuned for the subject area, such as this. Many projects have an assessment team. If you contribute a lot of content to an article you may request an independent assessment.
|Cognitive science articles by quality and importance|
|WikiWork factors (?)||ω =1,811||Ω = 4.78|