Wikipedia:WikiProject Equine/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the assessment department of the Equine WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about the equestrian world. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WPEQ}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Equine articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below. Or assess it yourself, using the guidelines here.
Who can assess articles? 
Anyone, but especially a member of the Equine WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
Discuss at the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Equine. Or, you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this article.

Instructions[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WPEQ}} project banner on its talk page.

{{WPEQ|class=|importance=}}

When applicable, status of an article as a part of a WPEQ task force may also be added with the

|breeds=yes

or

|training=yes

parameters following the "importance" parameter

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed equine articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance scale[edit]

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Agriculture.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Topics which may seem obscure to an audience in one part of the world—but which are of high notability in other places—could still be highly rated. However, topics of intense interest to a narrow demographic may not be of adequate general interest to earn a high rating.

Status Template Meaning of Status Examples
Top {{Top-importance}} This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information. Very few articles (currently about 10, no more than 1%) are top importance. Horse, Donkey
High {{High-importance}} This article is very important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge applicable to most equines and parts of the world, or covers a major topic of great significance. The only horse breeds that are ranked high should be those which have had a worldwide impact and influenced the creation of multiple other breeds. Relatively few articles (currently about 50, no more than 5%) are high importance. Saddle, Horse colic, Thoroughbred
Mid {{Mid-importance}} This article is relatively important to this project, as it either covers a topic of wide interest or fills in important specific knowledge of certain areas. The only horse breeds that are ranked mid-importance or higher are those either significant for their influence on other breeds, significant for their historical importance, or those which have very large numbers today. No more than about 10% of all WikiProject Equine articles (currently under 200) will be mid-importance. Bay (horse), English riding, Bowed tendon, Andalusian horse
Low {{Low-importance}} This article is not of overall general importance to this project because it either covers a specific area of knowledge or it covers a more obscure topic that is of limited scope. A "low" importance rating is not a quality assessment; an article of "low" importance may still be an excellent, FA-class article. Nearly all horse breeds will be ranked "low", as will most equestrianism disciplines, medical conditions, equipment, and biographies of individual people or horses tagged in this project. American Livestock Breeds Conservancy, Ambling, Eastern equine encephalitis virus, Banker horse
??? {{???}} This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be assessed. Default if no importance parameter is given
NA {{Not Applicable}} This article does not require an importance assessment. This is usually because it is a category, template, redirect, disambiguation page, or an example on a project page Category:Feral horses, Template:Equestrian Sports

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

:North Swedish Horse; expanded and re-illustrated, with some sources. Pitke (talk) 10:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Done. Montanabw(talk) 01:26, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Dartmoor Pony; expanded, multiple references / citations added. (ThatPeskyCommoner (talk) 07:38, 21 February 2011 (UTC))
Done, start to C, probably B class, but may need a touch more content (i.e. if someone ups it to B, I'm OK w/that, just being cautious). Montanabw(talk) 21:35, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
New Forest Pony please? Loads of refs etc. :o) ThatPeskyCommoner (talk) 16:24, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
... and Dales Pony, too? :o) ThatPeskyCommoner (talk) 17:54, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
You can do these now, you're "big" enough (pets pup's head... grin) Montanabw(talk) 21:13, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Did dat ting :o) ThatPeskyCommoner (talk) 07:00, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Assessment log[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

July 25, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 20, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 17, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Wonky Donkey (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

July 14, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 9, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 7, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Toronado (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

July 4, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 2, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 17, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Erbovirus (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

June 16, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Porfirio Rubirosa (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Priob (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Unmol (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

  • Ob pony (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Unmol Horse (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

June 15, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

June 14, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 9, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 8, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Animal show (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

June 3, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Arriero (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

May 31, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Esher Cup (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Stéphane Pasquier (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Whitsun Cup (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

May 29, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 27, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 26, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 23, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Overcheck (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

May 21, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Mezen horse (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

May 19, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 17, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 16, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 14, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 13, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 12, 2015[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Sweet Idea (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

May 9, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Equestrian Grand Slam (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Sweet Idea (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

May 6, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 4, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 1, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 29, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 28, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Sweet Idea (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

April 27, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 25, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 20, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Bridle path (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

April 19, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 17, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 13, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Arlington Downs (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).
  • Lendon Gray (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

April 12, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 11, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 8, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 7, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 6, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Tencendur (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

April 5, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 2, 2015[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Cellulitis (talk) removed. Quality rating was B-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

April 1, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 29, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 25, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

March 23, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 18, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 17, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 16, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

March 15, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 9, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Livery yard (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

March 7, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 6, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Bill Laurie (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

March 4, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 3, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 1, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 28, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 25, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 24, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 23, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 22, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 20, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 19, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Worklist[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

This page was once used by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. It is preserved because of the information in its edit history. This page should not be edited or deleted. Wikiproject article lists can be generated using the WP 1.0 web tool.