Wikipedia:WikiProject European Microstates/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the assessment department of the European Microstates WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about European Microstates or the people of European Microstates. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject European Microstates}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:European Microstates articles by quality and Category:European Microstates articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Index · Statistics · Log

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the European Microstates WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject European Microstates}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject European Microstates
|class=
|attention=
|collaboration-candidate=
|past-collaboration=
|peer-review= 
|old-peer-review=
|needs-infobox=
}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed European Microstates articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance scale[edit]

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of European Microstates.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status Template Meaning of Status
Top {{Top-Class}} This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
High {{High-Class}} This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
Mid {{Mid-Class}} This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
Low {{Low-Class}} This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
None None This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

We are currently discussing which articles should be counted as being of Top-importance at Wikipedia:WikiProject European Microstates/Assessment/Top-importance articles.

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Assessment log[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

February 12, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

February 10, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

February 9, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

February 8, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 7, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 6, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 5, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 3, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

February 2, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 1, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 31, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Bruno Morri (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

January 30, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 29, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • 1932 Monaco Grand Prix (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).
  • 1933 Monaco Grand Prix (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).
  • List of museums in San Marino (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Pope Adrian (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Pope Alexander (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Pope Anastasius (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Pope Eugene (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from List-Class to Disambig-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Pope Felix (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Pope Honorius (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from List-Class to Disambig-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Pope John Paul (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from List-Class to Disambig-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Pope Julius (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from List-Class to Disambig-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Pope Leo (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from List-Class to Disambig-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Pope Marcellus (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from List-Class to Disambig-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Pope Nicholas (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from List-Class to Disambig-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Pope Paul (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from List-Class to Disambig-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Pope Sylvester (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from List-Class to Disambig-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Pope Urban (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Pope Victor (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Saint Sixtus (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Women in Europe (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Top-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

January 27, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 26, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 25, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 24, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Antipope (talk) removed. Quality rating was B-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

January 23, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 22, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 21, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 19, 2016[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 18, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 15, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 13, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 12, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 11, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 10, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 9, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 8, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Serge Telle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

January 6, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Monacan Americans (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Walser (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

January 5, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 4, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 3, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Monaco-City (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).

January 1, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

December 31, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Joe Barral (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

December 30, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 29, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 28, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 27, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Worklist[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

This page was once used by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. It is preserved because of the information in its edit history. This page should not be edited or deleted. Wikiproject article lists can be generated using the WP 1.0 web tool.