Wikipedia:WikiProject Finland/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to the assessment department of the Finland WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Finland related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Finland}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Finland articles by quality and Category:Finland articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion for it, please consider requesting

How can I get my article rated? 
You can request a peer review at WP:PR. Alternately, you can ping and ask any active member of the project to rate the article.
Who can assess articles? 
Any editor or member of the Finland WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article per the criteria on their own (except for FA and GA-Classes, which require a peer review through their own systems or A-Class, which requires an independent and thorough peer review).
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can request a peer review at WP:PR. Alternately, you can ping and ask any active member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

Quality assessments[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Finland}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Finland|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Finland articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Finland articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Finland articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Finland articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Finland articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Finland articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Finland articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Finland articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Finland articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Finland articles) Category page Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Finland articles) Disambiguation page Disambig 
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Finland articles)  Draft 
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Finland articles)  File 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Finland articles)  Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Finland articles)  Project 
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Finland articles)  Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Finland articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Finland articles)  ??? 

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:Finland articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Finland}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Finland| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale[edit]

Label Criteria Examples
Top Core topics about Finland. Generally, these topics are sub-articles of the main Finland article, vital for the understanding of Finland or extremely notable to people outside of Finland. This category should stay limited to approximately 100 members. Biographies should be limited to the top one or two Finnish people in a particular field or persons of the greatest historical importance
High Topics that are very notable within Finland, and well-known outside of it, and can be reasonably expected to be included in any print encyclopedia. This includes cities with a population of more than 100,000.
Mid Topics that are reasonably notable on a national level within Finland without necessarily being famous or very notable internationally, including smaller towns
Low Topics of mostly local interest or those that are only included for complete coverage or as examples of a higher-level topic; peripheral or trivial topics or topics that have only a limited connection to Finland.

Assessment log[edit]

Finland articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

September 21, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Leena Kaskela (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Sam Lake (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).

September 20, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 19, 2018[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 18, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 17, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 16, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 15, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 13, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 12, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 11, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 10, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 9, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Rovio Entertainment (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

September 8, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Amos Rex (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

September 7, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 6, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 5, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 4, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 3, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Paavo Ravila (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 2, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 1, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 31, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Charlotte Thitz (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

August 30, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 29, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Infinite Visions (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to NA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Tyyni Tuulio (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

August 28, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 27, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 26, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 25, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 24, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 23, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 22, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Bonuviers Teater (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • ELSA-rata (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Engels Teater (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Sampo Terho (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

August 21, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 20, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 19, 2018[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 18, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Raimo Salmi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Reza Heidari (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).