Wikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Gemology and Jewelry WikiProject
Index · Statistics · Log

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Gemology and Jewelry articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognising excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Gemology and Jewelry articles by quality and Category:Gemology and Jewelry articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How do I add an article to the WikiProject? 
Just add {{WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any editor is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Please add your name to the list of participants if you wish to assess articles on a regular basis.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
Where can I get more comments about my article? 
The peer review department can conduct more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
How can I keep track of changes in article ratings? 
A full log of changes over the past thirty days is available here. If you are just looking for an overview, however, the statistics may be more accessible.

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

Quality assessments[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Gemology and Jewelry articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Gemology and Jewelry articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Gemology and Jewelry articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Gemology and Jewelry articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Gemology and Jewelry articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Gemology and Jewelry articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Gemology and Jewelry articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Gemology and Jewelry articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Gemology and Jewelry articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Gemology and Jewelry articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Gemology and Jewelry articles)  ??? 

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessments[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project:

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Gemology and Jewelry articles)  Top 
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Gemology and Jewelry articles)  High 
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Gemology and Jewelry articles)  Mid 
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Gemology and Jewelry articles)  Low 
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Gemology and Jewelry articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Gemology and Jewelry articles)  ??? 

The importance parameter should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

Importance scale[edit]

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Gemology and Jewelry.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Requesting an assessment[edit]

Click here to add a request


Participants[edit]

Please feel free to add your name to this list if you would like to join the assessment team

  1. SauliH (talk · contribs)

Assessment log[edit]

Gemology and Jewelry articles:
Index · Statistics · Log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Assessment log

October 7, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 6, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • ALTR Created Diamonds (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

October 1, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 28, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 26, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Jig (jewellery) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to NA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

September 24, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 22, 2018[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 18, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Glyptology (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 14, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 8, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 5, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 30, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 27, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Three hares (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class (rev · t).

August 24, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Leszko I (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).

August 22, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 20, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 19, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Catalina la Grande (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

August 15, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 8, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 7, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 4, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Lock ring (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

August 3, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 2, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Blue amber (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).

August 1, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 25, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 23, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 20, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 16, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 7, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 5, 2018[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • LifeGem (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

July 2, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Abnu šikinšu (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

July 1, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 19, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 18, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 6, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 27, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 24, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 23, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 19, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 18, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Leszko I (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

May 2, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 30, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 23, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 19, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Lotus chalice (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

April 18, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 17, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 17, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 10, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 3, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 29, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 26, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

March 12, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 9, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 3, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

March 1, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 28, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 20, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 12, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Earwire (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

January 28, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 23, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

December 10, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Kalabubu (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

December 9, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 7, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 4, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 1, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 30, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 29, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 27, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 25, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • 💎 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).

November 16, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 13, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Madaka (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

November 12, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 31, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 27, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 24, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 21, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 18, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 15, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Hallmark (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

October 10, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Vermeil (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to NA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

October 8, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Ann Sabina (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

October 7, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 6, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Louis Osman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

October 5, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 28, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Rovno amber (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

September 22, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 21, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 15, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Finding (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 13, 2017[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • FangFang (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 5, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Kimberly McDonald (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

August 30, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 26, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Apapa Hoard (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • Ari Norman (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

August 25, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Diamond District (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to NA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

August 22, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • FangFang (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

August 13, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 3, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 29, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 21, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 17, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 24, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 11, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 2, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 25, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 21, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 18, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 14, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 13, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Repossi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

May 12, 2017[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Ringsberry (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

May 10, 2017[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]