Wikipedia:WikiProject Greater Manchester/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is the assessment page for the Greater Manchester WikiProject.


Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance scale[edit]

Label Criteria
Top Articles describing the major structural elements of Greater Manchester, or subjects of UK or international importance
Examples: Manchester, Salford, metropolitan boroughs, major urban areas, former county or municipal boroughs, Manchester Airport, Manchester University.
High Articles describing the major infrastructure of Greater Manchester, or subjects of significant importance to Greater Manchester or North West England
Examples: crown courts, large stations (both current and historical), towns that are not former boroughs, parliamentary constituencies, Grade I listed buildings.
Mid Articles describing the minor infrastructure of Greater Manchester
Examples: medium sized stations, large libraries, magistrates courts, electoral wards, Grade II* listed buildings, nationally known schools, civil parishes, villages, notable localities.
Low Articles describing subjects of local interest
Examples: suburbs, small stations/metro stops, branch libraries, leisure centres, Grade II listed buildings, local parks.


How to assess articles[edit]

To assess an article, add |class= and |importance= to the WikiProject banner on the article's talk page to get this:

{{WikiProject Greater Manchester|class=|importance=}}

To assess the quality of the article, add either stub, start, C, B, GA, A, or FA after class=.

Example:
{{WikiProject Greater Manchester|class=GA|importance=}}

To assess the importance of the article, add low, mid, high, or top after importance=.

Example:
{{WikiProject Greater Manchester|class=GA|importance=high}}
The following is a list of parameters for different quality ratings and importance ratings
Featured article FA
A-Class article A
GA
B
C
Start
Stub
Needed

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article:

Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you are not certain how an article should be graded, or want an impartial view, the best place to make a request is on the wikiproject talk page. Due to the level of activity on that page, requests are more likely to be dealt with quickly there.

Log[edit]

October 8, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 7, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 6, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 5, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 4, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 3, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 2, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 1, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 30, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 29, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 28, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 27, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 26, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 25, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • M5000 (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
  • T-68 (talk) removed. Quality rating was C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • Weaste & Seedley (ward) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 24, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 23, 2018[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 22, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 21, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Lee Beard (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

September 20, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]