Wikipedia:WikiProject Grenada/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to the assessment department of Grenada WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about Grenada, its governments, people, geography, and history. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Grenada}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Grenada articles by quality and Category:Grenada articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of Trinidad and Tobago WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Grenada}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Grenada
|class= 
|importance= 
|attention= 
|needs-infobox= 
|peer-review= 
|old-peer-review= 
}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Grenada articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Quality scale[edit]

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Non-standard grades[edit]

There are a few other assessments used in the mainspace that are done by WikiProjects but do not fit into the scale; they are not necessarily used by all WikiProjects. The more popular assessments, in no particular order:

Other WikiProject assessments
Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
A-BB+
{{Bplus-Class}}
Detailed, clear and accessible, often with history or images; possible good article nominee. Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject which attempts to be as accessible as possible, with a minimum of jargon. No obvious problems, gaps, excessive information. May be improved by input from experts to assess where coverage is still missing, and also by illustrations, historical background and further references. Consider peer review or nominating for good article status. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time. Gödel's incompleteness theorems (as of December 2010)
Future
{{Future-Class}}
A topic where details are subject to change often. The article covers a future topic of which no broadcasted version exists so far and all information is subject to change when new information arises from reliable sources. With multiple reliable sources there might be information that contradicts other information in the same or other articles. Amount of meaningful content varies over time as the projected event draws near. Material added might be speculation and should be carefully sourced. The Waters of Mars (as of May 2009)
Current
{{Current-Class}}
A topic where details are subject to change often. The article covers an event or topic that is currently going on; such as football game or a sports team's season. Amount of meaningful content varies over time as the projected event goes on. Material added might quickly become obsolete. 2010 Alabama Crimson Tide football team (as of August 2010)
Disambig
{{Disambig-Class}}
Any disambiguation page falls under this class. The page directs the reader to other pages of the same title. Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Aa River (as of June 2008)
NA
{{NA-Class}}
Any non-article page that does not fit into any other category. The page does not have article content. May or may not apply, depending on the type of page. any WikiProject's internal resources
Redirect
{{Redirect-Class}}
Any redirect falls under this class. Collapse Into Now
Book
{{Book-Class}}
Any Wikipedia book falls under this class. Book:Canada
Template
{{Template-Class}}
Any template falls under this class. Template:Magnapop
Category
{{Category-Class}}
Any category falls under this class. Category:George Orwell

Some WikiProjects use additional grades not listed above, such as those used at WP:Comics. Most common are Cat, Dab (for Disambiguation), Current (for ongoing events), Image, Needed, and Template. See relevant Assessment page for the WikiProject, at Category:WikiProject assessments.

Importance scale[edit]

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Grenada.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

WikiProject article importance scheme

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Grenada}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Grenada| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

  1. Mt. Rich Petroglyphs

Assessment log[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

June 16, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 7, 2018[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 29, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 24, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 12, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 11, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 8, 2018[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 20, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 16, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 16, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 15, 2018[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 9, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

March 31, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Eric George (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

March 26, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

March 25, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 22, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

March 21, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

March 20, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 16, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 12, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 2, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 1, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 15, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 5, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 2, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 31, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Joan Anim-Addo (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

January 28, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 23, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

December 23, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 22, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 13, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 11, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

November 29, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 16, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Kairo Mitchell (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

November 12, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 21, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 18, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 17, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 9, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 5, 2017[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 30, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • George Harris (actor) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

September 14, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 13, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 9, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 9, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 4, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 15, 2017[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 14, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 11, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 9, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

Worklist[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

This page was once used by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. It is preserved because of the information in its edit history. This page should not be edited or deleted. Wikiproject article lists can be generated using the WP 1.0 web tool.