Wikipedia:WikiProject Indonesia/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

National emblem of Indonesia Garuda Pancasila.svg
WikiProject Indonesia

General information
Main project page
To-do list
Project members (Activities)
Naming conventions
Project-related templates
Useful resources
Indonesia Portal
Newsletters
Monitoring
Popular pages
Departments
Assessment
Cartography
Collaboration
Outreach
Peer review
Photography
Discussions
Project · Portal
Related projects
LOC Country Studies – Indonesia
Countering systemic bias
Deletion sorting – Indonesia
Edit · Recent changes


Quality: FA-Class | A Class | GA-Class | B-Class | Start-Class | Stub Class | Unassessed Importance: Top | High | Mid | Low | Unknown

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Indonesia! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Indonesia articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognising excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WP Indonesia}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Indonesia articles by quality and Category:Indonesia articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How do I add an article to the WikiProject? 
Just add {{WP Indonesia}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Indonesia WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Please add your name to the list of participants if you wish to assess articles on a regular basis.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
Where can I get more comments about my article? 
The Status requester can conduct more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
How can I keep track of changes in article ratings? 
A full log of changes over the past thirty days is available here. If you are just looking for an overview, however, the statistics may be more accessible.

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WP Indonesia}} project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax):

{{WP Indonesia|class=???|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Indonesia articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

The following values may be used for the importance parameter:

The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance scale[edit]

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of India.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status Template Meaning of Status
Top {{Top-importance}} This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
High {{High-importance}} This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
Mid {{Mid-importance}} This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
Low {{Low-importance}} This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
None None This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

Importance standards[edit]

  • Cities & administrative areas - Generally classed as high to mid importance.
  • Lists - Generally classed as mid to low importance, unless the subject is high (e.g. List of Presidents)
  • People - Generally classed as mid to high importance.
  • Provinces - Generally classed as top to high importance.
  • Places - Generally classed as mid to low importance.
  • Schools - Generally classed as mid to low importance.

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the peer review department instead.

click here to add new request

Participants[edit]

Feel free to add your name to this list if you would like to join the assessment team

  1. *drew (talk · contribs) - last edited on WP in 2007
  2. Calupict (talk · contribs) - last edited on WP in mid 2008
  3. Gunkarta (talk · contribs)
  4. Nathan.tang (talk · contribs)
  5. Rigadoun (talk · contribs)
  6. Rochelimit (talk · contribs)
  7. SatuSuro (talk · contribs)
  8. W Tanoto (talk · contribs)
  9. Ydef (talk · contribs)

Example assessments[edit]

To assess an article, paste one of the following onto the article's talk page.

Quality

  • {{WP Indonesia|class=FA}} - to rate an article at FA-Class
  • {{WP Indonesia|class=A}} - to rate an article at A-Class
  • {{WP Indonesia|class=GA}} - to rate an article at GA-Class
  • {{WP Indonesia|class=B}} - to rate an article at B-Class
  • {{WP Indonesia|class=Start}} - to rate an article at Start-Class
  • {{WP Indonesia|class=Stub}} - to rate an article at Stub-Class
  • {{WP Indonesia}} - to leave the article un-assessed.


Importance

  • {{WP Indonesia|importance=Top}} - to rate an article at Top importance
  • {{WP Indonesia|importance=High}} - to rate an article at High importance
  • {{WP Indonesia|importance=Mid}} - to rate an article at Mid importance
  • {{WP Indonesia|importance=Low}} - to rate an article at Low importance

Log[edit]

October 18, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 17, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Nasi kebuli (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Surabaya Zoo (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

  • Akashmoni (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Buaran River (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

October 16, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Padar (island) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Pongok Island (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Thomas Ryan Bayu (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Yanto Basna (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

October 15, 2017[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Rengginang (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 14, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Mendanau Island (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Rasyid Bakri (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

  • Trio Lestari (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

October 13, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 12, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Ridwan Awaludin (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).
  • Shandy Aulia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t).
  • Sukma Ayu (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 11, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Hamzah Haz (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • I Ketut Ariana (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).
  • Ilham Armaiyn (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Joko Widodo (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to Top-Class (rev · t).
  • Karamian Island (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Mesty Ariotedjo (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Mulham Arufin (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).
  • Ronald Asamsum (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 10, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 9, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Budiman Yunus (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • I Putu Dian Ananta (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

  • Mulavarman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

October 8, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 7, 2017[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Śri Ajñadewi (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

October 6, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 5, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Bima Train (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

October 4, 2017[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 3, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 2, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 1, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • GSF Explorer (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Indra Kahfi (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 30, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • CNN Indonesia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

September 29, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]