Wikipedia:WikiProject Kelly Clarkson/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the assessment department of the Kelly Clarkson WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Kelly Clarkson-related articles in Wikipedia. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

Contents

Quality assessments[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Kelly Clarkson}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Kelly Clarkson|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Kelly Clarkson articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Kelly Clarkson articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Kelly Clarkson articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Kelly Clarkson articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Kelly Clarkson articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Kelly Clarkson articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Kelly Clarkson articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Kelly Clarkson articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Kelly Clarkson articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Kelly Clarkson articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Kelly Clarkson articles)  ??? 

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Kelly Clarkson}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Kelly Clarkson| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale[edit]

Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Top The article is one of the core topics about Kelly Clarkson. A reader who is not involved in the Kelly Clarkson field will have high familiarity with the subject matter and should be able to relate to the topic easily. Articles in this importance range are written in mostly generic terms, leaving technical terms and descriptions for more specialized pages. Kelly Clarkson discography
High The article covers a topic that is vital to understanding Kelly Clarkson. Stronger (What Doesn't Kill You)
Mid The article covers a topic that has a strong but not vital role in Kelly Clarkson's career. Many readers will be familiar with the topic being discussed, but a larger majority of readers may have only cursory knowledge of the overall subject. Articles at this level will cover subjects that are well known but not necessarily vital to understandKelly Clarkson. Due to the topics covered at this level, Mid-importance articles will generally have more technical terms used in the article text. Already Gone
Low The article is not required knowledge for a broad understanding of Kelly Clarkson. Few readers outside the Kelly Clarkson WikiProject may not be familiar with the subject matter. It is likely that the reader does not know anything at all about the subject before reading the article. Articles at this range of importance will often delve into the minutiae of the Kelly Clarkson, using technical terms (and defining them) as needed. Topics included at this level include most infrastructure of Kelly Clarkson. Behind These Hazel Eyes

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.


Assessment log[edit]

Kelly Clarkson articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

July 29, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 17, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 9, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 2, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 23, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 27, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 4, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 7, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 6, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 28, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 25, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 30, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 28, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 13, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 8, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 24, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 30, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • PrizeFighter (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).

August 29, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 15, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 30, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 23, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • 4 Carats (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as High-Class (rev · t).

February 21, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 20, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 17, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • One Minute (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to GA-Class (rev · t).

February 7, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 6, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 29, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 26, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 16, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 10, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Just for Now (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as High-Class (rev · t).

November 2, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 30, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 26, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 8, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 20, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Tie It Up (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from High-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

August 11, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 24, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 22, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Tie It Up (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

June 21, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Tie It Up (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as High-Class (rev · t).

June 10, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 5, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 20, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 25, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 20, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 16, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 15, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 11, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 6, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 5, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 5, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 19, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 7, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 31, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 30, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 24, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 17, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 11, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 9, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 8, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 7, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 6, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 5, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 4, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 3, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 2, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 1, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 31, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 30, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 29, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 28, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 27, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 25, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 24, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 23, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 21, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 20, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 19, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 18, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 17, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 16, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 15, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 14, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 13, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 11, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 10, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 9, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 8, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 7, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 6, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 4, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 3, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 2, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 1, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 30, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 29, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 28, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 25, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 24, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 22, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 21, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 20, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 19, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 18, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 17, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 16, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 15, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 14, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 13, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 12, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 11, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]