Wikipedia:WikiProject Lady Gaga/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to the assessment department of the Lady Gaga WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Lady Gaga related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Lady Gaga}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Lady Gaga articles by quality and Category:Lady Gaga articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Lady Gaga WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

Quality assessments[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Lady Gaga}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Lady Gaga|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Lady Gaga articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Lady Gaga articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Lady Gaga articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Lady Gaga articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Lady Gaga articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Lady Gaga articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Lady Gaga articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Lady Gaga articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Lady Gaga articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Book (for Wikipedia books; adds pages to Category:Book-Class Lady Gaga articles) Wikipedia Book Book 
Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Lady Gaga articles) Category page Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Lady Gaga articles) Disambiguation page Disambig 
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Lady Gaga articles)  Draft 
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Lady Gaga articles)  File 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Lady Gaga articles)  Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Lady Gaga articles)  Project 
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Lady Gaga articles)  Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Lady Gaga articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Lady Gaga articles)  ??? 

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Lady Gaga}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Lady Gaga| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale[edit]

Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Top
{{Top-importance}}
Articles about the most historically and culturally notable Lady Gaga-related topics. These are the articles with the highest potential for being elevated to featured article status. A reader who is not necessarily a Lady Gaga fan will have high familiarity with a Top importance subject and should be able to relate to it easily. Only the most culturally and historically significant subjects will be assessed with Top importance, as these are the most likely to have large amounts of reliable secondary sources available to reference the article. As they appeal to a wide range of readers, articles in this importance range are written in mostly generic terms, leaving technical terms and descriptions for more specialized pages. Lady Gaga
High
{{High-importance}}
Articles about Lady Gaga-related topics that are historically and culturally notable. These articles have a high potential to be elevated to featured article status. Most readers will have some knowledge of these topics. It is likely that a good number of reliable secondary sources exist that could be used to reference the article. Articles at this level use some specific and specialized terms, as they appeal to readers who are likely familiar with the terminology related to Lady Gaga. Bad Romance
Mid
{{Mid-importance}}
These articles cover Lady Gaga-related topics that have a strong but not vital level of notability. These articles should still have the potential to reach good article or featured article status with work. Subjects may be rated mid-importance even if they do not have a high level of historical or cultural significance. Many readers will be familiar with these topics, but a larger majority of readers may have only cursory knowledge of them. Moderately well-known topics will be marked with Mid importance, as it is less likely that a high number of reliable secondary sources exist that cover it. Articles at this level will cover subjects that are well known but not necessarily vital to an understanding of Lady Gaga. Mid-importance articles will generally have more technical terms used in the article text. Most topics familiar only to Lady Gaga fans will be rated in this level. Do What U Want
Low
{{Low-importance}}
These articles cover Lady Gaga-related topics that have a low level of historical or cultural notability. Low importance articles have far less potential to be advanced to good article or featured article status than more notable topics. Few readers who are not Lady Gaga fans may be familiar with these topics. It is unlikely that the typical reader knows anything at all about a Low importance topic before reading its article. Lesser-known subjects might be listed with Low importance, as it is unlikely that many reliable secondary sources exist that cover it. Articles at this range of importance will often delve into the minutiae of the subject, using technical terms (and defining them) as needed. The Cherrytree Sessions (Lady Gaga EP)

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

  1. Christmas Tree (Lady Gaga song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- EA Swyer Talk Contributions 23:56, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
    Reassessed to B-class. Wonderful job. --Legolas (talk2me) 05:25, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
  2. Haus of Gaga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) YZJay 09:29, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
  3. Marry the Night (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) 19:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
  4. 3-Way (The Golden Rule) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)Chase (talk / contribs) 18:53, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Assessment log[edit]

Lady Gaga articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

June 10, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 7, 2018[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 23, 2018[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 22, 2018[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 15, 2018[edit]

Removed[edit]

March 30, 2018[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 30, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 26, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 22, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 10, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 27, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Lady Gaga (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from GA-Class to FA-Class (rev · t).

November 24, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 29, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Gagadon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

October 26, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 17, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 15, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 24, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 22, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 21, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 30, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 26, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 7, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 5, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 3, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 29, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 28, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 6, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 24, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 30, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 26, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 25, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 1, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 17, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 15, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 13, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 7, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 30, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

December 27, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

December 26, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 21, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • ArtRave (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to GA-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

December 17, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

November 23, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 14, 2016[edit]

Removed[edit]

November 12, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 11, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 10, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 9, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 7, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Joanne (Lady Gaga song) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

November 6, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 31, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 30, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 29, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 28, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 26, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 22, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 21, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Dive Bar Tour (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from High-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

October 20, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 19, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Book:Joanne (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Book-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as High-Class (rev · t).

October 15, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 14, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]