Wikipedia:WikiProject Lebanon/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Home Talk Participants Assessment To do Templates Outreach
Shortcut:


Scale of justice.svg Article assessment[edit]

Welcome to the article assessment page for WikiProject Lebanon! This page is meant to serve as a guideline for project members for assessing the quality and importance of articles that are covered by our project. Assessment is currently our topmost priority, because it will help us determine which areas require the most attention. The grading schemes used for the purposes of assessment are listed below. If you would like to review articles, be sure to read Instructions for reviewing an article.


Assessment criteria[edit]

Articles are assessed for both quality and importance. The criteria for each form of assessment are listed here.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance scale[edit]

Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Top The article is one of the core topics about Lebanon. A reader who is not involved in Lebanon will have high familiarity with the subject matter and should be able to relate to the topic easily. Articles in this importance range are written in mostly generic terms, leaving technical terms and descriptions for more specialized pages. Lebanon
High The article covers a topic that is vital to understanding specific topics about Lebanon or general topics about parts of Lebanon Most readers will have some knowledge of the subject Articles at this level cover particular issues related to Lebanon, specific terms are used to detail the topic Lebanese civil war
Mid The article covers a topic that has a strong but not vital role in Lebanon. Many readers will be familiar with the topic being discussed, but a larger majority of readers may have only cursory knowledge of the overall subject Articles at this level will cover subjects that are well known but not necessarily vital to understand Lebanon. Due to the topics covered at this level, Mid-importance articles will generally have more technical terms used in the article text.
Low The article is not required knowledge for a broad understanding of Lebanon, but may cover topics related to Lebanon. Few readers outside of Lebanon or that are not within the local area of the article's topic may be familiar with the subject matter. It is likely that the reader does not know anything at all about the subject before reading the article. Articles at this range of importance will often delve into the minutiae of Lebanon, using technical terms (and defining them) as needed. Arnoun

Instructions for reviewing an article[edit]

Assessing an article is very simple. Just follow these steps:

  1. Read the article carefully.
  2. Using the criteria listed above, decide on a covenient rating, for either quality, importance, or both.
  3. Add your rating to the WikiProject Lebanon template, which should be located on the article's talk page. The markup should look like this:

{{WikiProject Lebanon|class=your quality rating|importance=your importance rating}}

Assessments[edit]

This page was once used by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. It is preserved because of the information in its edit history. This page should not be edited or deleted. Wikiproject article lists can be generated using the WP 1.0 web tool.

Assessment Log[edit]

Expand

Assessment categories[edit]

Quality-based categories[edit]

Importance-based categories[edit]

Other[edit]