Wikipedia:WikiProject Northamptonshire/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This is updated every 3 days by WP 1.0 bot

Welcome to the assessment department of the Northamptonshire WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles related to Northamptonshire. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 programme, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognising excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WPNorthamptonshire}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Northamptonshire articles by quality and Category:Northamptonshire articles by importance.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Northamptonshire WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

Quality assessments[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WPNorthamptonshire}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WPNorthamptonshire|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Northamptonshire articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Northamptonshire articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Northamptonshire articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Northamptonshire articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Northamptonshire articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Northamptonshire articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Northamptonshire articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Northamptonshire articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Northamptonshire articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Northamptonshire articles) Category page Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Northamptonshire articles) Disambiguation page Disambig 
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Northamptonshire articles)  File 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Northamptonshire articles)  Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Northamptonshire articles)  Project 
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Northamptonshire articles)  Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Northamptonshire articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Northamptonshire articles)  ??? 

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:Northamptonshire articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

Some articles that are stubs will have the following template located at the bottom of the page: {{Northamptonshire-geo-stub}} by inserting {{Northamptonshire-geo-stub}}. Doing so will automatically add the article to the Category:Northamptonshire geography stubs. If you see a stub from the WikiProject Devon it is advised that you add the template to it, but make sure that it is removed for articles that are Start or above class.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WPNorthamptonshire}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WPNorthamptonshire| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale[edit]

Label Criteria Examples
Top Well known nationaly Northamptonshire
High Known of nationally Kettering
Mid Known within Northamptonshire Rushden
Low Not known across Northamptonshire Isham

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Requested assessments


  • Wellingborough I've made quite a few changes to the artical, can someone check it over for class please. Likelife (talk) 19:33, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Good articles[edit]

The featured article symbol
The good article symbol

Listed below are some of our finest articles, which are great examples of how to improve your article! If you're writing about a settlement there's a guideline page, especially written for you as part of our parent WikiProject, UK Geography. See How to write about a settlement. For articles to reach good article atatus they must go through a peer review by one of the GA reviewers. They will assess it on the quality of its prose and references mainly. Unlike featured article status, you don't need to cover all the areas in detail. For more information see: Wikipedia:Good article criteria and Wikipedia:Featured article criteria.

Featured articles[edit]

Good articles[edit]

Article alerts[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Northamptonshire/Article alerts

Assessment log[edit]

Northants articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically by a bot on a daily basis. It is a reflection of changes made to the talk page template in ratings of articles of this project. Please do not edit this section.


September 19, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 13, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 9, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 9, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 27, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 25, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 24, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 23, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 5, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Sophie Turner (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

August 1, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 26, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 22, 2017[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 15, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 5, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 28, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 24, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 11, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • 99p Stores (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

June 8, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 27, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Ben Foden (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

May 4, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 25, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 1, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 21, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 4, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 30, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

November 20, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 18, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 17, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 11, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 9, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Deene Park (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).

November 8, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 5, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 3, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 1, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 31, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 28, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 26, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 22, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 17, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 12, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Peter Bone (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Philip Hollobone (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

October 9, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 8, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 7, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Archdeacon of Northampton (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

October 4, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 25, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Anne Elizabeth Baker (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

September 20, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 10, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 9, 2016[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 8, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 6, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 1, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 30, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 29, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Church's (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Corby toxic waste case (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Crockett & Jones (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Edward Green Shoes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Loake (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Phil Hope (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Solovair (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Tredair (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

August 26, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Joan Wake (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

August 25, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 22, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 5, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 4, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Thenford (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

July 31, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 10, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 5, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Andrea Leadsom (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

June 29, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 12, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 4, 2016[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 3, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Wadenhoe (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t).