Wikipedia:WikiProject Nursing/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Human-emblem-favorite-blue-128.png Project Human-emblem-sound-blue-128.png Talk Human-emblem-handshake-blue-128.png Members Human-emblem-documents-blue-128.png Templates Human-emblem-star-blue-128.png Assessment

Quality: FA-Class | A Class | GA-Class | B-Class | Start-Class | Stub Class | Unassessed Importance: Top | High | Mid | Low

This page aims to give detailed information about how nursing related pages are assessed, and allows for requests to members of this wikiproject for assessments of pages.



An article's assessment is generated from the parameters in the {{WPNURSE}} project banner on the article's talk page. Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Nursing articles.


You can learn the syntax by looking at the talk pages in edit mode and by reading the info below. This is the rating syntax (ratings are samples, change to what applies to the article in question):

{{WPNURSE}} or {{WPNURSE|class=|importance=}}
  • Displays the default banner, showing the project info and only ??? for the quality and importance parameters.
  • Classed A with Top priority. All assessed articles should have quality and importance filled in.

Quality assessment[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WPMED}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WPMED| ... | class=??? | ...}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article:

Priority assessment[edit]

An article's priority assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WPNURSE}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WPNURSE| ... | importance=??? | ...}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter:

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance scale[edit]

WikiProject article importance scheme

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to a student or an expert.

Requesting an assessment or re-assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article please feel free to list it below.

Add articles here! Newest requests on the BOTTOM

Assessment log[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.