Welcome to WikiProject Paranormal, a WikiProject that aims to provide a framework for the improvement and organization of articles related to the paranormal, anomalous phenomena and other similar areas. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask us on our discussion page.
To provide a concise and accurate record of notable beliefs, organizations, experiments, individuals and events which are associated with the paranormal, including their history, background and their current status.
To provide a framework (including infoboxes, categories, and examples of Best Practice) from within which scholarly entries about the paranormal, and related topics, may be produced.
To provide a scholarly set of terminology to describe the paranormal which is technically, culturally, and contextually accurate.
To seek out and apply verifiable mainstream sources to pages within the projects scope with the aim of A) addressing any issues of verifiability and reliability that have been highlighted in existing entries, and B) ensuring that new entries are of sufficient quality that their verifiability and reliability do not become an issue.
To ensure that each entry approaches its topic from a balanced and neutral perspective.
To ensure that the notability of each topic can be gleaned from its entry, without the need for additional explanation.
To ensure that a clear dividing line is established between reporting the belief in/background of the topic in a scholarly manner, and advocating/denouncing the topic itself.
To expand project stubs to full entries and to progress full entries to the next level.
Patrol frequently vandalized pages within the project's scope.
The following articles fall within the scope of the project and have been noted for their outstanding quality. Project members are encouraged use them as examples of good practice and to note their different writing and organizational styles.
The article is hoax, or at least fiction, see details at talkpage. Before nomination, I askedUser:TheValeyard to clarify the status of the article. This incident does not appear in Hungarian historiography. Norden1990 (talk) 16:26, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
It is fiction, pure and simple, taken from a novel. Nobody heard of the event in Hungary, no history books mention it, so it can't be sourced. --Pagony (talk) 16:47, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Delete unless some sources can be identified. Odd. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:10, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
HOAX - Delete - The one source cited is a publisher's webpage for a novel, possibly a very recent one. Fictional works are not historical sources. I suspect the whole thing is trying to advertise the book in WP. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:48, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Although entertaining and quite interesting in its own way, it's hard to see how this meets the notability threshold. Although there are some media appearances and comments, many of them seem incidental. A fair portion of citations also appear to be self-published. Shritwod (talk) 14:17, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
* Keep – I've previously edited this article in minor ways. I would argue that it passes the threshold for notability, though perhaps not greatly exceeding that threshold. — jmcgnh(talk)(contribs) 16:38, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
delete as this appears to be an autobiography of a person with no support from references that have written about them. Also the books do not appear to have ever been reviewed. Wikipedia is being treated as though it were linkedin. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
This page falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.
This user is a part of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the paranormal. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
{{blackproject}} - Notice placed on talk pages of articles that discuss black projects — "highly classified military/defense projects, unacknowledged publicly by the government, military personnel, or defense contractors"
Because of the nature of such projects, the most authoritative sources (any involved governments and defense contractors) may not even acknowledge its existence. The most reliable sources may be highly speculative.
FA
GA
Borley Rectory
.png)
Definitions from Wiktionary
Media from Commons
News from Wikinews
Quotations from Wikiquote
Texts from Wikisource
Textbooks from Wikibooks
Learning resources from Wikiversity
