Wikipedia:WikiProject Peru/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Peru
National Flag of Peru
Coat of Arms of the Republic of Peru
Location of Peru in South America
IRC
#wikipedia-en-wpperu
Main pages
Main project talk
Peru portal talk
New articles talk
Cleanup articles talk
Nuvola apps kedit.png Peer review talk
Deletion talk
Peru related ACID
Article improvement drive talk
  Previous collaborations talk
  Featured collaborations talk
  Previous nominations talk
Peru Assessment
Assessment department talk
  Assessment bot log talk
Task forces
Translation project talk
Images task force talk
Maps task force talk
Congressional project talk
Other
Outreach talk
Template list talk
Category structure talk
Notability criteria talk
External links talk

Welcome to the assessment department of the Peru WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Peru related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{PeruProjectBanner}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Peru articles by quality and Category:Peru articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Peru WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

Quality assessments[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Peru}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Peru|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Peru articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Peru articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Peru articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Peru articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Peru articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Peru articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Peru articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Peru articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Peru articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Peru articles) Category page Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Peru articles) Disambiguation page Disambig 
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Peru articles)  Draft 
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Peru articles)  File 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Peru articles)  Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Peru articles)  Project 
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Peru articles)  Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Peru articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Peru articles)  ??? 

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:Peru articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{PeruProjectBanner}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Peru| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale[edit]

Label Criteria Examples
Top See Criteria for Top classification Peru, Culture of Peru, Lima
High Topics that are very notable within Peru, and not unheard of outside of it, and can be reasonably expected to be included in any print encyclopedia Trujillo, National University of San Marcos
Mid Topics that are reasonably notable on a national level within Peru without necessarily being famous or very notable internationally
Low Topics of mostly local interest or those that are only included for complete coverage or as examples of a higher-level topic; peripheral or trivial topics

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.


Assessment log[edit]

The text below is transcluded from Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Peru articles by quality log

Peru articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a weekly basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

September 25, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

  • Laura Caller (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 24, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 23, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

September 22, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 21, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

September 20, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Yana Qaqa (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

September 19, 2016[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 18, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 17, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

September 16, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 14, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

September 13, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 12, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

September 11, 2016[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 10, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

September 9, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

  • Raju Cutac (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 8, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

September 7, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Coricancha (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • Piruro (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Saposoa Airport (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

  • Phiruru (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Qurikancha (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).

September 6, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 5, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 4, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

September 3, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

September 2, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 1, 2016[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • National Afro-Peruvian Museum (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 30, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]