Wikipedia:WikiProject Piracy/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Contents

Assessment guidelines[edit]

The following system is used by the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team for assessing how close we are to a distribution-quality article. The system is based on a letter scheme which reflects principally how complete the article is, though the content and language quality are also factors. Once an article reaches the A-Class, it is considered "complete", although edits will continue to be made.

Two levels, GA and FA, are not assessments that can be assigned simply by a project member. These refer to external judgments of article quality made at WP:GA and WP:FA. If these tags are desired, and the article meets the criteria (for GA or FA), it must be nominated (for GA or FA) and await comments.

At present this assessment system is in use in the Wikipedia 1.0 project, and in several hundred WikiProjects on the English Wikipedia. As of November 16, 2007, over 900,000 articles have been assessed. Other languages are now beginning to use the system also.

There is a separate scale for rating articles for importance or priority, which is unrelated to the quality scale outlined here. Unlike the quality scale, the priority scale varies based on the project scope. See also a proposed template at {{Importance Scheme}}.

Assessment scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance scale[edit]

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Micronations.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Current WikiProject stats[edit]

The following table shows the current stats of articles listed under the scope of WikiProject Piracy...



Requesting assessment or re-assessment[edit]

  1. Chagres and Fort San Lorenzo

To request an assessment on an article, add the article to the bottom of the list:


Assessment log[edit]

July 15, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 8, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 5, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 16, 2018[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 15, 2018[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 27, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 25, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 19, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 16, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 7, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 7, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 23, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 18, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 16, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 16, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 8, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 7, 2018[edit]

Removed[edit]

March 31, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 23, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 18, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 13, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 11, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 27, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Hubert Hugo (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).
  • Julienne David (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

February 22, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • River piracy (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Disambig-Class (rev · t).

February 20, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 15, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 31, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 28, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 23, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 25, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

December 16, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

December 12, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

December 11, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 30, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 28, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 23, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 12, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 28, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 14, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 9, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 8, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 5, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 3, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 29, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 20, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 18, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 17, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 15, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 14, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 9, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 9, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]