Wikipedia:WikiProject Software/Free and open-source software task force

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Welcome to the free and open-source software task force, a project devoted to creating, improving, and maintaining articles pertinent to free and open-source software (FOSS), and bringing them to good or featured article status. The scope of this project extends to:

Always remember to follow Wikipedia conventions, and to be bold.

The FOSS task force is supported by WikiProject Software and WikiProject Computing.

Article rating statistics

Free software articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
GA 1 3 4 3 1 12
B 12 29 28 19 3 91
C 8 54 87 110 34 293
Start 5 66 162 595 204 1,032
Stub 9 33 410 155 607
List 2 5 13 12 10 42
Book 2 2
Category 94 94
Disambig 1 1 2
File 3 3
Portal 2 2
Project 2 2
Redirect 18 71 89
Template 36 36
Other 1 1
Assessed 28 166 327 1,168 212 407 2,308
Unassessed 1 402 403
Total 28 166 327 1,169 212 809 2,711
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 10,432 Ω = 5.04


To edit ratings for articles tagged {{WikiProject Free Software}}, just add |class=|importance= inside the {{}} symbols, i.e. {{WikiProject Free Software|class=|importance=}}. The tag does not do this automatically, so by adding this you can rate the article.

Free software articles by quality log

What to do

Here are some tasks that have to be done constantly or to almost every article. Further down the page you'll find TODO lists with one-off tasks that need to be done.

Verifying the bare minimum

Each article about a free and open-source software project should:

  1. Contain a link to the Free and open-source software portal
    • The easiest way to do this is to add {{Portal|Free and open-source software}} to the "See also" section or the last section of prose in the article body.
    • Alternatively, add {{Portal bar|Free and open-source software}} to the bottom of the page.
  2. Mention that it is free and open-source software in the opening paragraph, preferably in the first sentence
  3. Describe the free software licenses used by the project, preferably in the infobox, with a citation to the project's license
  4. Use {{citation needed}} to tag any unverified statements

Adding references

If you want to use an external webpage as a reference for a statement, the best way to do this is with a "{{cite web}}" template inside <ref> tags. The "cite web" template can take many optional fields, but "title" and "url" are mandatory. So here's a minimal reference:

The GNU project was launched in 1983.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.gnu.org/gnu/initial-announcement.html
|title=GNU Initial Announcement
|}}</ref>

Or if the information isn't so obvious in the linked document, or if you can give more information, you can use some of the additional tags:

<ref>{{cite web
|title = POSIX® 1003.1 FAQ Version 1.12
|url = http://www.opengroup.org/austin/papers/posix_faq.html
|quote = The name POSIX was suggested by Richard Stallman.
|date = 2006-02-02
|accessdate = 2006-07-16
|}}</ref>

Article alerts

Articles for deletion

Proposed deletions

Participants

Participants

If you wish to join the project, please add your name to the list with:

#{{np2|username}} ~~~~~

Join the free and open-source software task force

  1. 0xd34df00d (talk · contribs) 08:30, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. A.Ou (talk · contribs) 01:35, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
  3. Adam1213 (talk · contribs) 10:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. Aditya.as (talk · contribs) 18:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  5. Ajith P V (talk · contribs) 08:37, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
  6. AlexKmml (talk · contribs) 21:39, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
  7. Alfasst (talk · contribs) 16:45, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
  8. Amit6 (talk · contribs) 14:21, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  9. Anhimgr8 (talk · contribs) 03:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  10. Annoyamouse (talk · contribs) 06:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
  11. Antonio Lopez (talk · contribs) 17:22, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
  12. Apageor2 (talk · contribs) 19:33, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
  13. Arcyqwerty (talk · contribs) 21:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
  14. Ashawley (talk · contribs) 02:42, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  15. Bazinga26 (talk · contribs) 17:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
  16. Bbabybear02 (talk · contribs) 05:10, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
  17. Bbadger (talk · contribs) 16:56, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
  18. Benjamin Mako Hill (talk · contribs) 13:24, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  19. Blacksmith (talk · contribs) 09:22, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
  20. Bodsda (talk · contribs) 11:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
  21. Bytbox (talk · contribs) 09:33, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
  22. CFeyecare (talk · contribs) 02:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
  23. Cabalamat (talk · contribs) 05:31, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
  24. Carpetsmoker (talk · contribs) 01:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  25. Chenzw (talk · contribs) 10:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
  26. ChristinFrohne (talk · contribs) 12:28, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  27. Chills42 (talk · contribs) 20:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
  28. CloneDeath (talk · contribs) 19:23, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  29. Codecodelover (talk · contribs) 21:30, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
  30. CoolingGibbon (talk · contribs) 00:11, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
  31. Cooljeanius (talk · contribs) 23:53, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
  32. Cyberdiablo (talk · contribs) 18:37, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
  33. Czarkoff (talk · contribs) 06:51, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  34. Daimanta (talk · contribs) 17:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  35. DaniDarling (talk · contribs) 18:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  36. Daniel kenneth (talk · contribs) 14:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
  37. Deblopper (talk · contribs) 17:23, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
  38. DENAMAX (talk · contribs) 18:15, 23 April 2015‎ (UTC)
  39. Ewald (talk · contribs) 19:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
  40. Feezo (talk · contribs) 00:56, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
  41. Flaming (talk · contribs) 03:16, 14 February 2008‎ (UTC)
  42. FlyingToaster (talk · contribs) 01:40, 4 January 2009‎ (UTC)
  43. FOSSilised (talk · contribs) 16:57, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
  44. Gl1d3r (talk · contribs) 02:21, 3 December 2010‎ (UTC)
  45. Gnepets (talk · contribs) 12:54, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  46. Gronky (talk · contribs) 14:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
  47. Guy Macon (talk · contribs) 20:42, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
  48. Guyjohnston (talk · contribs) 12:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
  49. H2g2bob (talk · contribs) 14:35, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  50. Happysmileman (talk · contribs) 16:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  51. HockeyInJune (talk · contribs) 02:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  52. Hotshotesquire (talk · contribs) 01:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  53. Hyperreallogic (talk · contribs) 02:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
  54. Infamouse (talk · contribs) 16:43, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
  55. Iraneal (talk · contribs) 22:56, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
  56. Isilanes (talk · contribs) 14:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  57. JackSlice (talk · contribs) 05:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
  58. Je mir (talk · contribs) 10:07, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  59. Jet123 (talk · contribs) 01:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  60. Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 20:47, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
  61. Jimduchek (talk · contribs) 15:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
  62. Joeblakesley (talk · contribs) 16:37, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  63. Johnsu01 (talk · contribs) 15:34, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  64. Jonathan.roberts.uk (talk · contribs) 8:17, 6 Marth 2007 (UTC)
  65. JordanMussi (talk · contribs) 13:49, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
  66. JorgePeixoto (talk · contribs) 18:23, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
  67. Jrtayloriv (talk · contribs) 22:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
  68. Karl.brown (talk · contribs) 21:10, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
  69. KernelExcqtable (talk · contribs) 22:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
  70. KeybladeSephi (talk · contribs) 22:42, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
  71. Kl4m (talk · contribs) 03:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
  72. Koman90 (talk · contribs) 22:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
  73. Linus M. (talk · contribs) 16:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
  74. Little Filament (talk · contribs) 15:31, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  75. Luca Edd Fike (talk · contribs) 12:21, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
  76. Ma11achy (talk · contribs) 13:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  77. Mad Pierrot (talk · contribs) 19:51, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
  78. Mayurf (talk · contribs) 00:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
  79. Md gilbert (talk · contribs) 20:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  80. Melab-1 (talk · contribs) 00:25, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
  81. Melnakeeb (talk · contribs) 09:14, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
  82. Menasim (talk · contribs) 18:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
  83. MichaelNetzer (talk · contribs) 08:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
  84. Mike Linksvayer (talk · contribs) 19:05, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
  85. Mnair69 (talk · contribs) 02:08, 12 December 2018‎ (UTC)
  86. Mohammadnasiruddin (talk · contribs) 00:11, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
  87. Monochrome Monitor (talk · contribs) 01:47, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
  88. Muchris (talk · contribs) 12:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  89. Narwaro (talk · contribs) 22:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
  90. NerdyNSK (talk · contribs) 00:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
  91. Newslinger (talk · contribs) 20:45, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
  92. Nickispeaki (talk · contribs) 08:45, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
  93. Nightrune (talk · contribs) 00:32, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
  94. Northgrove (talk · contribs) 13:09, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
  95. P3net (talk · contribs) 05:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  96. Palmpilot (talk · contribs) 01:16, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
  97. Pmresource (talk · contribs) 12:06, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  98. Potatoj316 (talk · contribs) 19:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
  99. Punk physicist (talk · contribs) 20:59, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
  100. Puttyschool (talk · contribs) 20:25, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  101. Raunak777 (talk · contribs) 12:16, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  102. RedDwarfPlanet (talk · contribs) 19:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
  103. RedSpike101 (talk · contribs) 15:53, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
  104. Resistor (talk · contribs) 22:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
  105. Richlv (talk · contribs) 14:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
  106. Rozzychan (talk · contribs) 10:53, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
  107. Russh (talk · contribs) 11:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
  108. RyGuy (talk · contribs) 14:18, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
  109. Saeedbiniqbal (talk · contribs) 14:11, 19 February 2008‎ (UTC)
  110. SantaWinsAgain (talk · contribs) 13:20, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
  111. Sco1996 (talk · contribs) 07:26, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
  112. ScotXW (talk · contribs) 13:44, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
  113. Sean (talk · contribs) 20:08, 26 December 2009‎ (UTC)
  114. Sean Amoss (talk · contribs) 18:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
  115. Secondplanet (talk · contribs) 16:20, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
  116. Sgartner (talk · contribs) 21:54, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  117. Shooke (talk · contribs) 19:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
  118. Shruti14 (talk · contribs) 20:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
  119. Sidnext2none (talk · contribs) 10:05, 22 October 2013‎ (UTC)
  120. Skeith (talk · contribs) 16:51, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  121. Smmsadrnezh (talk · contribs) 20:14, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
  122. Sodaplayer (talk · contribs) 22:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
  123. Some Gadget Geek (talk · contribs) 20:03, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  124. SpK (talk · contribs) 13:18, 22 February 2007‎ (UTC)
  125. Stephenchou0722 (talk · contribs) 01:34, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
  126. Stewart Little (talk · contribs) 14:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  127. Stormchaser (talk · contribs) 17:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
  128. Sub-Z3R0 (talk · contribs) 00:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  129. Superm401 (talk · contribs) 03:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  130. Tharikrish (talk · contribs) 15:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
  131. Themcman1 (talk · contribs) 10:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  132. Theoa (talk · contribs) 07:17, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
  133. Thorenn (talk · contribs) 21:11, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
  134. Timeshifter (talk · contribs) 22:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
  135. Tinucherian (talk · contribs) 06:51, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
  136. Tiven2240 (talk · contribs) 08:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
  137. Trisweb (talk · contribs) 00:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  138. Tyciol (talk · contribs) 04:21, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
  139. Unforgiven24 (talk · contribs) 04:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
  140. UrbanTerrorist (talk · contribs) 20:17, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  141. VARGUX (talk · contribs) 20:54, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
  142. VJ (talk · contribs) 17:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  143. Vendion (talk · contribs) 18:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
  144. Vincentvikram (talk · contribs) 07:20, 28 March 2010‎ (UTC)
  145. Vishwin60 (talk · contribs) 20:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  146. Waterfox (talk · contribs) 22:54, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
  147. Wei2912 (talk · contribs) 07:11, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
  148. Wikinerd2000 (talk · contribs) 18:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  149. Wwwolf3 (talk · contribs) 00:52, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
  150. Yarou (talk · contribs) 18:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
  151. Zazpot (talk · contribs) 13:03, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
  152. Zephyris (talk · contribs) 19:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  153. Zhaofeng Li (talk · contribs) 14:40, 29 September 2012 (UTC)


After you sign up, please get active on this page and/or on the Talk page. You may want to add some of the below todo lists to your watch list.

Templates

Articles

To tag an article as a FOSS article, please add the following to the top of its talk page:

{{WikiProject Computing|class=|importance=|software=y|software-importance=|free software=y|free-software-importance=}}

This produces the following banner:

WikiProject Computing / Software / Free Software (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
 This page is supported by WikiProject Software.
Taskforce icon
 This page is supported by WikiProject Free Software.
 

The banner adds the talk page to Category:WikiProject Free Software articles.

Userbox

The FOSS task force userbox is transcluded by using {{User FOSS task force}}, which yields:

Free and open-source software logo (2009).svgThis user is in the free and open-source software task force.

Invitation

To invite a user to the FOSS task force, use {{subst:FOSS task force invite}}, which displays:

Free and open-source software logo (2009).svg

Hi, WikiProject Software/Free and open-source software task force! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to free and open-source software. I'd like to invite you to become a part of the free and open-source software task force, a project aimed at improving the quality of articles about free and open-source software on Wikipedia.

If you would like to participate, please visit the free and open-source software task force for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Participants". Thanks! ~~~~

Assessment

The Assessment department will focus on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's FOSS-related articles. This will aid us in recognising excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

Assessment should be conducted following these guidelines.

WikiProject article quality grading scheme
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
Featured article FA  The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies our very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; and
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process.
  2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using either footnotes (<ref>Smith 2007, p. 1</ref>) or Harvard referencing (Smith 2007, p. 1)—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style.
 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. Cleopatra
(as of June 2018)
A-Class article A  The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).
 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. Battle of Nam River
(as of June 2014)
 GA  The article has attained good article status having been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the good article criteria:

A good article is:

  1. Well written:
    1. the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and
    2. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. FreeBSD
B-Class article B  The article is mostly complete and without major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the six B-Class criteria:
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. GNU General Public License
C-Class article C  The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective. It is most likely that C-Class articles have a reasonable encyclopedic style.
 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Free and open-source software
Start-Class article Start  An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete. It might or might not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style compliance non-existent. The article should satisfy fundamental content policies, such as Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Frequently, the referencing is inadequate, although enough sources are usually provided to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.
 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. cd (command)
Stub-Class article Stub  A very basic description of the topic. However, all very-bad-quality articles will fall into this category.
More detailed criteria
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short; but, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category. Although Stub-class articles are the lowest class of the normal classes, they are adequate enough to be an accepted article, though they do have risks of being dropped from being an article altogether.
 Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Integer set library
Featured list FL  The article has attained featured list status.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
  1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  2. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  3. Comprehensiveness.
    • (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items.
    • (b) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article.
  4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
  5. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
  6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events
(as of May 2018)
 List  Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. Comparison of free and open-source software licenses
Category page Category  Any category falls under this class. Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. Category:Free and open-source software organizations
Disambiguation page Disambig  Any disambiguation page falls under this class. The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. Free software (disambiguation)
 File  Any page in the file namespace falls under this class. The page contains an image, a sound clip or other media-related content. Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited. File:Linus Torvalds.jpeg
 Portal  Any page in the portal namespace falls under this class. Portals are intended to serve as "main pages" for specific topics. Editor involvement is essential to ensure that portals are kept up to date. Portal:Free and open-source software
 Project  All WikiProject-related pages fall under this class. Project pages are intended to aid editors in article development, and are probably not useful to readers. Develop these pages into collaborative resources useful for improving articles within the project. Wikipedia:WikiProject Software/Free Software
Redirect page Redirect  Any redirect falls under this class. The page redirects to another article with a similar name, related topic or that has been merged the original article at this location. Editor involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. ANSI/POSIX Environment
 Template  Any template falls under this class. The most common types of template include infoboxes and navboxes. Different types of template serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. Template:Free and open-source typography

Stub, Start, and B class assessments can be made by every editor (although it is generally regarded good behaviour not to assess an article in which you have had a major influence yourself)
A class assessment is made within this project
Good Article and Feature Article assessments require formal review procedures outside of this project.

Open tasks

edit · history · watch · refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Software/Free and open-source software task force:
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
NaodW29-nowiki286369b71e7b327900000001

If you would like to help, here are some suggestions for things to do. The date in parenthesis is the date on which the task was added.

  1. (2019-02-02) The Draft:List of copyleft licenses draft needs to be properly sourced, and then submitted to Articles for Creation.
  2. (2018-08-27) The Source-available software article needs to be expanded with high-quality secondary sources.
  3. (2014-02-14) The The Geochemist's Workbench article is trying to become a comparison of geochemical modelling programs -- none of the free ones have more than a link.
  4. (2012-03-12) The Comparison of video converters article needs to be expanded. See: Category:Free video conversion software.
  5. (2011-12-26) Please comment on essay on reliable sources for software articles.
  6. (2008-10-29) The Comparison of 3D computer graphics software article needs to be heavily expanded.
  7. (2008-09-26) The OJS article needs significant cleanup, and reads like an advertisement.
  8. (2008-03-19) The article Hacker (programmer subculture) has some sections which should be rewritten with a more "detached" style, and needs more references.
  9. (2007-10-28) The timeline of FSF's and Debian's free software definitions needs to be constructed (see Talk:The Free Software Definition#Timeline: FSD and DFSG)
  10. (2007-09-18) The European Union v. Microsoft (the anti-trust case) article needs to add mentions of FSFE, free software, and Samba.
  11. (2007-09-17) The GNU Compiler Collection article contains no information about how fast/slow or big/small the outputted programs are.
  12. (2007-08-13) GPL linking exception - this article isn't yet linked to by the articles about projects that use this exception, and the article itself contains quite a few tags complaining about original research or mistakes. Care sought.
  13. (2007-05-14) The GNU/Linux naming controversy, Emacs, Common Unix Printing System, Ubuntu (operating system) and PaX articles were formerly featured articles, but have since had that status revoked. Maybe it would be easy to get them back up to Featured Article quality.
  14. (2007-04-13) The Player Project needs expansion, particularly someone with knowledge of the project to write about its history, goals, features without turning it back into an advert.
  15. (2007-04-11) The dual-licensing article needs some clean-up (this is half-done now)
  16. (2007-03-03) Patents and free software is a consolidation of previous stubs - it's new, so it needs some help and some review
  17. (2007-02-07) The History of free software article is new and seeks contributions, particularly if you have links to essays by old-times for info about free software in the 80s and 70s, as well as 90s and 60s.
  18. (2007-01-24) Some cleanup, and some aggregation, and probably some merging, is needed for Autotools, GNU build system, and GNU toolchain
  19. (2006-12-18) Add a section on how to contribute to the opensource community. This should cover how to create a program from existing technologies, languages and other opensource programs, how to fix a bug, write documentation, etc.
  20. (2006-10-10) Many articles containing phrases such as "free software licence" or "free software community", when it is usually better to link to "free software licence" and "free software community" instead of the main free software article.
  21. (2006-09-18) Free software should be mentioned in Software engineering
  22. (2006-09-13) Free software community needs more work
  23. (2006-08-25) For each article about a free software package, there should be a link to the licence information.
  24. (2006-08-22) The Category:Free software companies category is new and could use some help.
  25. (2006-06-15) add {{Free-software-stub}} to free software related articles which are stubs
  26. (2006-06-06) Work is being done to create useful sub-categories in Category:Free software. This requires help to move articles from Category:free software into the sub-categories.
  27. (2006-04-12) Add the {{Portal|Free and open-source software}} tag to articles about, or related to, free and open-source software.

The following articles are not yet started. If you are only able to write a stub, please add the {{free-software-stub}} tag.

Open Usability e.V. | Verein zur Förderung Freier Informationen und Software | Verein zur Förderung Freier Software | Wilhelm Tux | iPKG | Organisation of Free Software in Education and Teaching

Exquisite-kfind.png On Wikipedia, "stubs" are articles that someone has started, but need help in their expansion. Free software related stubs can be found in Category:Free software stubs. There you will find free software articles-in-need.

Here are some specific articles that have been highlighted by contributors to this portal: Association For Free Software | Associazione Software Libero | Associação Nacional para o Software Livre | Beamer (LaTeX) | BKchem | DSPAM | Free Software Award for Projects of Social Benefit | Collaborative software development model | Free Software Directory | Free Software Foundation Latin America | Free software movement | Fundación Vía Libre | Gnash | GNU Oleo | Loïc Dachary | lsh | Ricardo Galli | Sourcefire, Inc | Stet | W3C Software Notice and License | ExifTool

See also

Related projects

Categories

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Software/Free_and_open-source_software_task_force&oldid=883123968"