Wikipedia:WikiProject Technology/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Assessment · Collaboration · Review · Outreach · Task forces

The Assessment department finds technological articles and rate them on Quality scale.

The articles are rated by examining them and comparing them to the Quality scale. A template is then place on the article's talk page stating that the article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology and displaying what rating the article has been given when compared to the Quality scale.

Requests for assessment[edit]

Technological articles can be found in Category:Technology and its subcategories

Template[edit]

WikiProject Technology (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Quality scale[edit]

Featured articles[edit]

Reserved for articles that meet the featured article criteria and have received featured article status after community review

Featured articles are selected at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates

A-Class[edit]

Reserved for articles that have received A-Class status after review by the project. Such articles are expected to largely meet the featured article criteria, and must be comprehensive, accurate, well-sourced, and decently-written.

A-Class articles are selected by the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Review#A-Class Review.

Good articles[edit]

Reserved for articles that meet the good article criteria and have received good article status.

Good articles are selected at Wikipedia:Good article nominations.

B-Class[edit]

The article meets the following six criteria:

  1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited.
  2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies.
  3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.
  4. It is free from major grammatical errors.
  5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.
  6. It is written from a neutral point of view

Start Class[edit]

Start class article have a few paragraphs that provide all the key points but may not cover all aspects of the subject. These articles usually have an image or infobox to support the text.

Start-class articles are selected by individual assessors.

Stub Class[edit]

Stubs are very short articles which offer a quick description of the subject

Stub articles are selected by individual assessors

Simplified quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Statistics[edit]

Current status[edit]


Log[edit]

October 8, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 7, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • AMX Mouse (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

October 6, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 5, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 4, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 3, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 2, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 1, 2018[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 30, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 29, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 28, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 27, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 26, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 25, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 24, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 23, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 22, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 21, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Nanotube (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Redirect-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

September 20, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 19, 2018[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 18, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Besom (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Candle snuffer (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • D-ring (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Hackle (wig making) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Unassessed-Class (rev · t).
  • Lid (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Quick connect fitting (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

September 17, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 16, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Requests for assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

  • VHS - Please assess this article for "B" grade. I've made some significant additions and changes. I think the article fulfills the criteria as a "B" article. Thank you! Groink (talk) 08:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Millenniata - Please assess this article for "B" grade. I rewrote it as NPoV. I believe the company itself is only notable for the M-DISC technology (a type of specialty DVD-R), but I'm not sure of the best way to handle that. Advice appreciated! —Hobart (talk) 01:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
  • I noticed that in Talk:Fucking Machines that this unfortunate article has a Good Article status from this WikiProject. This status needs to be reconsidered and likely removed. Rlsheehan (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)