Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Main Page   Article Guidelines   Assessment   Cleanup   Templates   Grand Slam Project   Tournament Task Force   Members >> Join
Tim Henman Wimbledon 2005 1.jpg

WikiProject on
Tennis
Main pages
Project Main Page talk
Article Guidelines talk
Assessment Department talk
Cleanup Department talk
Templates and Categories talk
Grand Slam Project talk
Davis Cup/Fed Cup Project talk
Tournament Task Force talk
Tennis Portal talk


Welcome to the Assessment Department of the Tennis WikiProject. This department was made to assess and grade the quality and importance of articles related to tennis. The main purpose is to recognise excellent articles and to identify articles that might need more work or could be improved.


Frequently Asked Questions[edit]

How can I get a tennis article rated?

Please list it in the section for assessment requests at the bottom of this page.

Who can assess tennis articles?

Any member of the Tennis WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article. Please note that the GA and FA classes need to be assessed by the community, and need consensus for promotion.

Someone put a {{WikiProject Tennis}} template on an article, but it's not a Tennis-related article. What should I do?

Feel free to remove the template, if it is improperly placed.

How do I assess a tennis article?

Place a {{WikiProject Tennis}} template on the article's Talk page using this tag: {{WikiProject Tennis|class=|importance=}}
An example based on class=start, importance=mid:
WikiProject Tennis (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This page has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Tennis articles by quality and importance[edit]

100% Quality assessed (based on articles with {{WikiProject Tennis}} template on talk page)

   

100% Importance assessed (based on articles with {{WikiProject Tennis}} template on talk page)

   


Update table: update project data

Instructions[edit]

The assessment of an article is made with the class and importance perimeters, with the {{WikiProject Tennis}} banner.

Quality Scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance Scale[edit]

Tennis article importance grading scheme
Label Criteria Examples
Top Articles strictly related to the game: rules of the game, associations. The Grand Slam tournaments as well as the season ending championships on both ATP and WTA tours, Davis Cup and Fed Cup Tennis
Women's Tennis Association
Australian Open
High Former or current world number ones, Grand Slam tournament winners, ATP Masters Series tournaments, WTA Tier I Series/WTA Premier mandatory/5 tournaments. Andre Agassi
2008 ATP Tour
Canada Masters
Mid Former or current Top 20 players, International and International Series Gold category tournaments/250 and 500 series tournaments. As well as all WTA International tournaments Alicia Molik
2005 French Open
SAP Open
Low Any other Tennis-related articles. Futures and ATP Challenger Series tournaments and ITF tournaments. Maret Ani
2005 French Open - Men's Singles
Sporting Challenger
NA Any Tennis-related templates, categories, disambiguation pages and images. Template:Draw key
Category:Tennis
1977 Australian Open


Assessment requests[edit]

2016[edit]

  • Milos Raonic - Currently C-class/Mid-importance. I believe this is at least B-class, but don't feel right adjusting it myself. I've been doing a massive overhaul (as documented here) over the past weeks. My intention is to keep working it towards good article status and, eventually, featured article. Thanks. Saskoiler (talk) 01:03, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done–Categorized as B-class. Good job. --Wolbo (talk) 01:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

2015[edit]

2014[edit]

Yes check.svg Done–Categorized as B-class. Nice work! --Wolbo (talk) 23:58, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
  • João Sousa - Originally rated Stub-class, Low-importance. I categorized it as C-class, but I am unsure if it's the correct one. SOAD KoRn (talk) 22:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done–Categorized as B-class pending the GA review. Nice article.--Wolbo (talk) 00:45, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done–Categorized as C-class. I realize the red text color matches the team color but it did not meet contrast requirements per WCAG so I updated it to white.--Wolbo (talk) 00:37, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done–Categorized as C-class.--Wolbo (talk) 02:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Add your request here


Assessment log[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

July 24, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 23, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 22, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 21, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 20, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 19, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 18, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 16, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 15, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 14, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Lev Urusov (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

July 13, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 12, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]