Wikipedia:WikiProject Thailand/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the assessment department of the Thailand WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about Thailand, its land, people, and history. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Thailand}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Thailand articles by quality and Category:Thailand articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Thailand WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Thailand}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Thailand
|class=
|attention=
|collaboration-candidate=
|past-collaboration=
|peer-review= 
|old-peer-review=
|needs-infobox=
}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed-Class Thailand articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance scale[edit]

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Thailand.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status Template Meaning of Status
Top {{Top-Class}} This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
High {{High-Class}} This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
Mid {{Mid-Class}} This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
Low {{Low-Class}} This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
None None This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

We are currently discussing which articles should be counted as being of Top-importance at Wikipedia:WikiProject Thailand/Assessment/Top-importance articles.

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

  1. Tourism in Thailand Assessed as C-class/Top-importance. See article's talk page for details. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
  2. Pheu Thai Party -- RJFF (talk) 14:37, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
  3. Abhisit Vejjajiva Please check against B-class criteria -- RJFF (talk) 15:48, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Assessment log[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

July 2, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Asiatic linsang (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Ipomoea aquatica (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • Kai yang (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t).
  • Kouprey (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Lao language (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • M-150 (energy drink) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 17, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 16, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Pannarai (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Tawee Boonyaket (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

June 15, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 14, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 13, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 12, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Kue cucur (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Pokklaw Anan (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

  • Kuih cucur (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Pokkhao Anan (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

June 10, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 9, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Eld's deer (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • Sitthichai Sitsongpeenong (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

June 8, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 7, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 6, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Thon Buri (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Thon Buri Kingdom (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as High-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

June 5, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • AutoAlliance Thailand (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 4, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 3, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Ayothaya (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Intharacha (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Suphanburi (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • Trailokkanat (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

June 1, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Maechi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

  • Mae ji (talk) removed. Quality rating was C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

May 31, 2015[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 30, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 29, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 27, 2015[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 26, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 25, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 24, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Parapadsorn Disdamrong (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 21, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 20, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 19, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 18, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 17, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Thai Forest Tradition (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to High-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

  • Ban Ho Mosque (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

May 16, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 15, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 14, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Wat Yan Nawa (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

May 13, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 12, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 11, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Worklist[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

This page was once used by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. It is preserved because of the information in its edit history. This page should not be edited or deleted. Wikiproject article lists can be generated using the WP 1.0 web tool.