Wikipedia:WikiProject Time/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the assessment department of the Time WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Time related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Time}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Time articles by quality and Category:Time articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Time WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

Quality assessments[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Time}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Time|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Time articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Time articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Time articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Time articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Time articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Time articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Time articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Time articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Time articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Time articles) Category page Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Time articles) Disambiguation page Disambig 
File (for files; adds pages to Category:File-Class Time articles)  File 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Time articles)  Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Time articles)  Project 
Template (for templates; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Time articles)  Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Time articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Time articles)  ??? 

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:Time articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Time}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Time| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale[edit]

Label Criteria Examples
Top Core topics about Time. Generally, these topics are sub-articles of the main Time article, vital for the understanding of Time or extremely notable to people outside of the field of the study of Time. This category should stay limited to approximately 100 members. Biographies should be limited to the top one or two people in a particular field or persons of the greatest historical importance
High Topics that are very notable within the field of Time, and well-known outside of it, and can be reasonably expected to be included in any print encyclopedia.
Mid Topics that are reasonably notable on a national level within Time without necessarily being famous or very notable outside of the field.
Low Topics of mostly specialized interest or those that are only included for complete coverage or as examples of a higher-level topic; peripheral or trivial topics or topics that have only a limited connection to Time.

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.


  • Should all months (January-->December) be High Importance. They are very notable within the field of Time and are included in print encyclopedias. Callanecc (talk) 13:30, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Assessment log[edit]

Time articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

July 29, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Timecode (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 28, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 26, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 24, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • 656 BC (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • 659 BC (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • 660 BC (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • 663 BC (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • 715 BC (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • 730 BC (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

July 23, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • 1918 in Japan (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to List-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • 2014 in Japan (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to List-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

July 20, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 18, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 17, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 15, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 14, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Meni (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

July 13, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 12, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]