Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Home Assessment Cleanup Participants Guidelines To do list Talkpage Templates Translators
Index · Statistics · Log

Welcome to the assessment department of the Wine WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Wine related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Wine}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Wine articles by quality and Category:Wine articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Wine WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

Quality assessments[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Wine}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Wine|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Wine articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Wine articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Wine articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Wine articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Wine articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Wine articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Wine articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Wine articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Wine articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Wine articles) Category page Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Wine articles) Disambiguation page Disambig 
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Wine articles)  Draft 
FM (for files; adds pages to Category:FM-Class Wine articles) Featured media FM 
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Wine articles)  File 
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Wine articles) Redirect page Redirect 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Wine articles)  Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Wine articles)  Project 
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Wine articles)  Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Wine articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Wine articles)  ??? 

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:Wine articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Non-article grades[edit]

There are a few other assessments used in the mainspace that are done by WikiProjects but do not fit into the scale. Some of these are not used by all WikiProjects. Of these, only List-Class is tracked by the bot. In no particular order:

]

Other WikiProject assessments [
Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Project
{{Project-Class}}
All project and task force pages fall into this category.
Can be given an importance rating.
Portal
{{Portal-Class}}
All portal pages fall into this category.
Can be given an importance rating.
List
{{List-Class}}
An article that meets the definition of a Stand-alone List. It should contain many wikilinks, with descriptions. There is no one way to make a list, but it should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists can be anything from a stub to a Featured List. List of aikidoka (as of June 2007)
File
{{Image-Class}}
All food related images not contained in WikiMedia Commons fall into this category.
Can be given an importance rating.
Template
{{Template-Class}}
All template pages fall into this category. Used to identify templates that can be used in Wine articles, including project banners, user boxes and page templates. WP Food & Drink banner
Disambig
{{Disambig-Class}}
Any disambiguation page falls under this class. The page directs the reader to other pages of the same title. Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Aa River (as of June 2008)
Category
{{Category-Class}}
All categories used to organize food related articles and pages into logical groupings. Allows users to find related articles, e.g. Baking articles. Allows editors to find and group similar articles to allow better project integration . FA-Importance Wine articles
Needed
{{Needed-Class}}
An article page that should exist, but does not. The page does not exist or is a redirect. An appropriate article should be created on the subject. Lake effect (as of April 2007)
NA
{{NA-Class}}
Any non-article page that does not fit into any other category. The page does not have article content. May or may not apply, depending on the type of page. Square knot (as of November 2006)

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Wine}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Wine| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale[edit]

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Comics.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status Template Meaning of Status
Top {{Top-Class}} Core topics about Wine. Generally, these topics are sub-articles of the main Wine article, vital for the understanding of Wine. This category should stay limited to approximately 100 members. Biographies should be limited to the top one or two people in a particular field or persons of the greatest historical importance
High {{High-Class}} Topics that are very notable within the field of Wine, and not unheard of outside of it, and can be reasonably expected to be included in any print encyclopedia
Mid {{Mid-Class}} Topics that are reasonably notable within the field of Wine aficionados without necessarily being famous or very notable by the greater community.
Low {{Low-Class}} Topics of mostly local interest or those that are only included for complete coverage or as examples of a higher-level topic; peripheral or trivial topics
NA {{NA-Class}} Used for categories, templates, portal and project pages, separate from article space.

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Request reassessment for substantially rewritten articles Blaye (wine), Pessac-Léognan. Also request assessment for new articles Pauillac AOC, Margaux AOC and Pomerol AOC.Havelock Jones (talk) 17:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Reassessed Pessac-Léognan as C-class. Assessed Pomerol AOC as C-class, high importance. Good job!Tthaas (talk) 16:37, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Request reassessment for Rudy Kurniawan, Denis Dubourdieu, and Domaine Ponsot. I have self-assesed as start/low for most, but want an outside opinion. Tthaas (talk) 16:37, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Request assessment for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:La_Crescent_(grape) User:Pdxdoglover

Assessment log[edit]

Wine articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

June 17, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 16, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 15, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 14, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 13, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 12, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 11, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 10, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 9, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 8, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 7, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 6, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 4, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 3, 2018[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 2, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 1, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 31, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 30, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 29, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 28, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 27, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 26, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 25, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 24, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 23, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 22, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 21, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 20, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 19, 2018[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 18, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 17, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 16, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 15, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 14, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 13, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 12, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 11, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 9, 2018[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Liquor (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).

May 8, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 7, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 7, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 6, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 5, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 4, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 3, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 2, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 1, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 30, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 29, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 28, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 27, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 26, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 25, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 24, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 23, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 22, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 21, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 20, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 19, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 18, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 17, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 17, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 16, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 16, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 15, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 14, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Florio (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

April 12, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 11, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 10, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 9, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 8, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 7, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 6, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 5, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 4, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 3, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 2, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 1, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 31, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 30, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 29, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 28, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 27, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 26, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Kamptal (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • Kremstal (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • Traisental (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).

March 25, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 24, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 23, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 22, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Italian Swiss Colony (wine) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).
  • Kenwood Vineyards (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • OneHope Wine (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

March 21, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 20, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 19, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 18, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Nizza (wine) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

March 17, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 16, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 15, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 14, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 13, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 12, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 11, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 10, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 9, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 8, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]