Two cases remain open, Abortion and Senkaku Islands; the second is very close to finished.
The Arbitration Committee is still seeking comments from the community regarding the candidates presented for appointment to the CheckUser and Oversight teams (see previous Signpost coverage). Comments concerning the suitability or unsuitability of the individual candidates may be made publicly or submitted privately via email to the committee until 23:59, 4 October 2011 (UTC). It is expected that by October 10 appointments will be announced from the list of approved candidates:
CheckUser: 28bytes • AGK • Courcelles • Elockid • HelloAnnyong • Keegan • Kww • Mentifisto • WilliamH
Oversight: Courcelles • Fluffernutter • WilliamH
I'm not entirely certain what this graph is intended to represent. I note, also, that it appears to only include pages of current cases, and does not include amendment requests, clarification requests, noticeboards, talk pages of noticeboards or other committee-related pages, anything to do with the AUSC, any other committee-related subpages (including the current CU/OS candidate pages). If that could be added in, it might give a picture that is a bit more realistic for people who are attempting to assess the amount of discussion related to the Arbitration Committee. Risker (talk) 16:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC)