Three open cases
The Committee neither closed nor opened any cases, leaving the total at three.
Fæ (Week 5)
The case concerns alleged misconduct by Fæ, brought by MBisanz. Proposed decisions are due tomorrow (Tuesday 26 June).
In response to a Workshop proposal calling for his desysopping, Fæ's administrator rights were removed at his request on 18 June; he has declared he will not pursue RfA until June 2013, and that should another user nominate him and he feels confident to run, he will launch a reconfirmation RfA rather than requesting the tools back without community process.
The case was referred to the committee by Timotheus Canens
, after TheSoundAndTheFury
filed a "voluminous AE request
" concerning behavioural issues in relation to Ohconfucius
, and Shrigley
. The accused deny his claims and decried TheSoundAndTheFury for his alleged "POV-pushing". According to TheSoundAndTheFury
, the problem lies not with "these editors' points of view per se
"; rather, it is "fundamentally about behaviour".
Proposed decisions are due by 30 June.
The case, filed by P.T. Aufrette, concerns the suitability of the new move review forum, after a contentious requested move discussion (initiated by the filer) was closed as successful by JHunterJ; the close was a matter of much contention, with allegations that the move was not supported by consensus. After a series of reverts by Deacon of Pndapetzim, Kwamikagami and Gnangarra, the partiality of JHunterJ's decision was discussed, as was the intensity of Deacon of Pndapetzim's academic interests in the topic.
Evidence submissions and proposed decisions are due 28 June and 12 July, respectively.
is written by editors like you — join in!