On Wikipedia, an essay is a page in the project namespace (Wikipedia:) that is written by one or more editors that typically addresses some aspect of working on or with Wikipedia. Such pages are categorized into Category:Wikipedia essays or a related subcategory. Essays may range from personal or minority views, to views that enjoy a wide consensus amongst Wikipedia editors. Unlike policies and guidelines, no formal attempt to gauge their consensus has been made.
User essays have a purpose similar to essays placed in the project namespace; however, they are often authored by only one person, and may represent a strictly personal viewpoint about Wikipedia.
This is a proposed recommendation for adding a simple consensus building method to discussions on Wikipedia. Initially it has to start as a voluntary experiment to see what changes are needed and how it catches on. The intent is to adhere to keeping it simple and avoid instruction creep as much as possible.
This consensus-building method encourages results that include all the editors' stated positions, like any consensus-based method. Importantly, it also mitigates the ability to filibuster or obstruct a discussion. It does that by requiring editors to state their positions up front, and obligating editors who object to a proposal to make a better proposal that includes all sides. An editor who does not make an effort to meet those obligations is more visible in having not participated, and may be excluded from the discussion if necessary to reach a conclusion. It makes it easier to show who is acting in good faith.
Even with that said, we're all human. So it can't possibly be perfect. We're looking for an improvement good enough to make Wikipedia more fun, or at least not setting up valuable volunteers to drive each other away, while retaining its basic principle of large scale consensus-based decision making. Remember the saying, Perfect is the enemy of done. So let's find what it takes to achieve these needed improvements in consensus building! Read more...
One of the criteria for inappropriate usernames is "is extremely lengthy". Given that "extremely lengthy" is undefined, subjectivity is brought in. Under the terms of Dweller's Sri Lankan cricket team test, if the username is longer than the longest surname of any Sri Lankan cricketer, it is inappropriate. Currently (4th November 2007) that record is held by Pradeep Jayaprakashdaran, at 16 letters. Critics of Dweller's Sri Lankan cricket team test may point out that this criterion is arbitrary, inexplicable and, erm, subjective. The critics are correct. — from Wikipedia:Dweller's Sri Lankan cricket team test
The following is a list of Wikipedia essays by category. The purpose of an essay is to aid or comment on the encyclopedia and not any unrelated causes. Essays have no official status, and do not speak for the Wikipedia community as they may be created without approval.