This page is for requesting access to the AFC Helper script. If you wish to discuss this list, its requirements, or AFCH in general, do so at the main talk page.

Requests

All archived requests older than one month can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants/Old Requests.
We generally do not notify users of acceptances, so check back often.
Non-admins should refrain from closing reviews.

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Create an account to request permissions.

(add request)

Shortcut

WT:AFCP

Review the Criteria before making a request.

Administrators and new page reviewers are automatically approved and do not need to be added to the list.
If approved, consider adding yourself to the list of reviewers by subject.

March

Inactive (Mar)

User:Jeromeenriquez

Jeromeenriquez (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights. i would like to help more as i have been inactive please make me active to bring more knowledge to the platform.thanks. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 12:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Name change (Mar)

Codename Noreste (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

Was renamed from 64andtim to Codename Noreste. Codename Noreste (talk) 10:09, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 08:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dilettante

Dilettante (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

I created this account as User:Novo Tape and was granted AFCH by Ingenuity but recently received a username change. I'm listed by my old name on the participants page. Would it be possible to replace that with my new username? Sincerely, Dilettante 16:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 07:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New (Mar)

User:Antny08

Antny08 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

Hello, I am a Wikipedia user that is interested in helping others improve their articles. I am an extended-confirmed user, and have over 1000 edits on here (some I have deleted). I have created many articles on Wikipedia, and am looking to help others do the same thing. I have never had any action taken against me for violating any rules, because I have not violated any. As an AfC participant, I will use my knowledge of Wikipedia and my skill to accurately, unbiasedly, and efficiently help to review articles to help make Wikipedia a better place. I am an active user and can actively check on articles and help improve them during the drafting process. Thank you for your time!

UPDATE TO APPLICATION: I have throughly reviewed Wikipedia notability guidelines, and countless other guidelines for Wikipedia, so I believe I am fit to review articles. I am fully willing to quickly answer questions from any users. Thank you.

Antny08 (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, too many deleted articles and problems at AFD. Primefac (talk) 08:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The deleted articles I have deleted myself except for some, and I have not had problems with AFD, I have only had discussions with people about what is correct and what is not. I ask that you please reconsider, as I believe I am more than fit to be a reviewer. Thank you and have a good day. Antny08 (talk) 13:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For further information, I have only had 6 actually articles deleted. The rest were on talk pages / deleted to clean up space, such as my request for adminship. 3 of the articles I created that have been deleted were deleted by me, either because I realized they were not notable enough, or because of a name misspell (Battle of Namka Chun). The 3 that were deleted by others, 1 of them I was able to recreate. And the final 2 that were deleted by others and I was not able to recreate, were articles I did earlier into my time as a Wikipedia editor. I have not had any "problems" at AFD unless you are considering not agreeing with others on certain decisions as problems. Any mistakes that I have made have shown me not to make those mistakes again and why, and I believe that making these mistakes has given me more knowledge than somebody who never makes any mistakes. Thank you for your time, and I once again ask that you reconsider. Antny08 (talk) 13:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

33% success at AFD is a problem. You are correct that the deleted pages are not a significant portion of the pages you have written overall, but I also just found the copyright violation among your deleted pages. This decline is not a "never", just a "not now". Primefac (talk) 08:33, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's because according to that it says I have only participated in 3 AfDs (which is incorrect). The one for the List of military engagements of World War II is wrong, I was the one who created the AfD and I wanted it to be merged. It saying that I wanted it to be deleted is an error with the system, so I should have 66% success. Although I have not participated in many AfDs directly, I have viewed countless other AfDs, so I am more familiar with the process than it shows. Antny08 (talk) 11:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A 66% success rate is still very low and a recent copyright violation is an indicator that you are not yet experienced enough for this right.

Not done, please continue to gain experience with AfD and content policies rather than arguing with this decline. Spicy (talk) 14:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright violation was because I was basing the text on an article off of a source I was using. It does not show I am not experienced enough in any way. I realized my mistake and as I stated earlier mistakes help you learn better than not making them in the first place. I recreated the article using my own words and it still up to this day. Having only 1 AfD result turn out against the consensus is not bad. Also note the copyright violation was multiple months ago, in my earlier times on Wikipedia, it is not that recent. Please reconsider. Antny08 (talk) 14:24, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let me be blunt; you have had two admins tell you that you are not quite ready. I said earlier you were at a "not now". Continuing to insist that you must have access to this tool will very quickly turn that into a "never". Get some more experience, write some more articles, and come back in a couple of months. Primefac (talk) 14:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will, but I believe I do have a right to argue this decision, which I properly and respectfully did, but I will not comment any further unless asked. Have a good day. Antny08 (talk) 14:39, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Twinkle1990

Twinkle1990 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

@Primefac I'm applying again after 9+ months. I'm requesting this for a probationary period of 1-3 weeks to prove my competency. Let it be. If not then how I can prove my competency and efficiency in AfC? Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:36, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For reference see WT:WikiProject Articles for creation/Archive 53#We need to be more cautious which led to Twinkle1990 being removed. @Twinkle1990 what have you learned since that time and what would do differently? S0091 (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091 whatever I learned is simple, my old perceptions and doings were wrong. And I don't hesitate to admit that I did wrong. Twinkle1990 (talk) 08:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle1990, could you elaborate a little bit on that? What did you do wrong? Primefac (talk) 08:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did wrong by rejecting a handful of AfC drafts those were eligible for acceptance. Also, I accepted one draft, which was later deleted by AfD. At that time, I also did wrong by ignoring non-English sourcing. Those were my grave mistake. I have realized it over the time. Twinkle1990 (talk) 09:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac if you don't give chance for just a few (say 1-2 weeks) just deny my request. Otherwise, give me a chance to prove myself. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The other requests were rather straight-forward. I am still thinking about your answers above. Please be patient. Primefac (talk) 15:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well. You are free to do so. I will have no hard feelings even if I am denied.--Twinkle1990 (talk) 02:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. In addition I am restricting you to a maximum of five reviews per day. Primefac (talk) 20:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Macbeejack

Macbeejack (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

I think i understand Wikipedia's Notability Guidelines and having good faith to Wikipedia. Also wanted to contribute to reduce the heavy backlog load. Please check if i am eligible to review AFC drafts. Thank You. Macbeejack ☎ 04:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Primefac. I will not let you down. Since I cannot see the review option on any draft, I would like to know if you have granted permission to review the draft. Macbeejack ☎ 05:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have to enable the tool in your preferences. Primefac (talk) 08:24, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:CSMention269

CSMention269 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

I have most of my articles got accepted through AFC review. My policy is to work and assess only topics from WP:NPOL and India-related. Having such right will help me to reduce backlogs in AFC. CSMention269 (talk) 07:39, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:14 novembre

14 novembre (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

I meet the criteria, and I have a significant experience in drafts, in fact, I have several times successfully nominated them for speedy deletion or moved to more appropriate title, so I think the possibility of reviewing drafts could help me to contribute constructively at Wikipedia. 14 novembre (talk) 14:45, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) You have least experience in AfD and AfC, apart from that you have ANI thread issues per your PCR permission declined by @Ingenuity:. CSMention269 (talk) 15:20, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CSMention269 why do you comment there? 14 novembre (talk) 08:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. I am still concerned about the various issues brought up in various locations about your tenacity and mistake-making, so I am restricting you to a maximum of five reviews per day. Primefac (talk) 20:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac Thank you so much for your careful evaluation of the situation. I think you have done the best choice. Kind regards 14 novembre (talk) 21:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Afyaniuhai

Afyaniuhai (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

As an experienced editor, acquiring afc helper script rights would enable me to contribute significantly to reducing the AFC backlog. ANU^writes 15:01, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Anuwrites

Anuwrites (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

Just lost access to the AfC helper script because I changed my username from user:afyaniuhai to user:anuwrites. "Anuwrites" is not listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants. Could I ask to be added again on the list? ANU^writes 20:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 20:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Guessitsavis

Guessitsavis (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

Hey, I was hoping to become an AfC reviewer to gain more experience with Wikipedia policy, and reduce the backlog. Thanks! Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 01:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Listen1st

Listen1st (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

I am requesting afc helper script rights to help reduce the AFC backlog. Listen1st (talk) 17:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 20:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Unknown-Tree

Unknown-Tree (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

I would like to be able to use the AfC helper script to review nominations for AfC, as I feel I sufficiently meet the criteria. Unknown-Tree🌲? (talk) 01:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 20:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:V.B.Speranza

V.B.Speranza (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

Hi fellow editors, I would like to be able to review AfC submissions.

I’ve created over 130 articles and one of them is GA. After being active for over a year with near 5000 edits I believe I acquired a decent amount of knowledge regarding Wikipedia's deletion policy which is evidenced by my contributions. Thank you for your attention. V.B.Speranza (talk) 21:58, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 07:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hassocks5489

Hassocks5489 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

I am an experienced Wikipedian with an extensive record of article creations and other contributions over an 18-year period (>50,000 edits, >300 articles created). I have recently started exploring the AfC space and have noticed some promising drafts in areas of my particular expertise, which I would like to bring to article space and improve. I would expect my future reviewing activity to be focused on the same general areas. I am on Wikipedia every day and can commit to responding to queries promptly. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 09:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 07:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jonathan Deamer

Jonathan Deamer (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

I'm requesting AFC helper script rights as I currently participate in recent changes/new pages patrolling and AfDs, and would like to contribute to the project further.

I've read the reviewer criteria and believe I meet them:

Experience in the quick-fail criteria review step from work on speedy deletions, vandalism patrols.
Experience in the notability and verifiability review step from participation in AfDs and my general editing/page creation.
Experience in the suitability review step through my own article creation, DYK submissions and general editing history. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 11:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 07:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Brindille1

Brindille1 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

I've been editing a lot of articles in the US football project, and have noticed that some articles have gone quite a while without a review (see Draft:2024 Hartford Athletic Season for example). I'd love to be a reviewer to encourage and help new Wikipedia editors. Brindille1 (talk) 03:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 07:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Spiderjiu

Spiderjiu (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

I am working on WP:DRAFT, known WP:HTCAP, WP:YFA and WP:N as well. Spiderjiu (talk) 15:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 07:36, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chennai Passangai

Chennai Passangai (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights Chennai Passangai (talk) 14:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Primefac (talk) 15:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Robertjamal12

Robertjamal12 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

Hello, I would like to get involved in WP:AFC to help reduce the backlog and gain experience Robertjamal12 ~🔔 13:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robertjamal12, I will be honest, your AFD stats are... really not good. How do you think this demonstrates that you have a understanding the deletion policy? Primefac (talk) 12:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac Yes, I understand the stats are not good that is why I took sometime off AFD discussions. I think I have a good understanding now and would like to gain more experience here at the WP:AFC as well -- Robertjamal12 ~🔔 12:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shonyx

Shonyx (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

I am became an AFC reviewer with an 502 edits. I can confirm the articles that been created and I can relate the created article to electrical engineering, engineering etc. I don't have experience to be an AFC reviewer but this is a great idea to review the new articles. ‍ Shonyx 03:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, fails minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 15:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April

Inactive (April)

User:Gryllida

Gryllida (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

Was helping previously, with access having expired due to inactivity. Keen to resume activity now. Please re-add me to participants list. Thanks Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 22:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 11:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sahaib

Sahaib (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

I used to contribute to WP:AFD and would like to review more articles. I am less busy nowadays as well, former name was User:Sahaib3005. Sahaib (talk) 07:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:-noah-

-noah- (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

Hi! I used to be a probationary reviewer a while ago but then I stopped being active and my permissions expired. Thanks! Noah ^💬 00:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New (Apr)

User:Idunnox3

Idunnox3 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

Hi! I'd like to contribute to WP:AfC project and now I have enough time for it. I've read the rules, and I have some WP:AFD experience to start with. Idunnox3 (talk) 12:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, fails minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 11:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shonyx

Shonyx (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

I have an experience with WP:AFD and reverting articles. As a participator of WikiProject Articles for creation, I have now the experience of:

reject/decline the draft if the draft has low on citations and no notable support between independent sources and the draft itself.
approve of these drafts and move them to article space if theres a connection between independent sources, affiliated sources and the draft must have a inline citations. If does the article had 1550 letters, then I slapped (means 'nominate deletion of the article) and copyright violation.
declining of the draft submitted because breaks the WP:GNG, WP:BIO, etc.

I have more than 500 edits and I have low on undeleted edits, see my contributions ‍ Shonyx 06:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and one last thing I mentioned that my account is more than 90 days ‍ Shonyx 06:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, fails minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 11:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac What requirements I failed? ‍ Shonyx 05:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account is more than 90 days old, but that is the only requirement you seem to have met at the moment. Primefac (talk) 06:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:AWN08

AWN08 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

I would like to review AfC primarily on British non-profit organisations, international relations, militaries and politics. AWN08 (talk) 22:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now; a bit more content creation experience and/or deletion-related experience will help. Primefac (talk) 11:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:NegativeMP1

NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

Requesting AfC reviewer to help out in more general areas of Wikipedia, which includes decreasing the backlog. My account is about a year old, and while I've created very few articles overall (25~), I would say I have pretty good comprehension of the notability guidelines. I have plenty of experience in AfD, having participated in it nearly as long as I've been on Wikipedia with a 62% success rate (+ more if you count merges). I also have a general idea of other notability guidelines, but I only say "general idea" because I don't write articles for, say, sports players. I would respond to questions quickly as I am very active on-wiki. λ NegativeMP1 04:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC) λ NegativeMP1 04:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Xkalponik

Xkalponik (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

I've been a longtime editor with 3.5k+ edits, created (out of the 4 deleted articles 3 were self-delete) and contributed to a fair number of articles, having GA, and passed DYKs. I've participated in various WikiProjects, most notably WIR and WikiProject:Fungi. I've experience with AFDs and noticeboard discussions. For quite some time now, I'm almost regular to the wiki and if able, I hope to respond promptly to questions about my reviews. I have a good grasp of the policies and guidelines mentioned in the reviewing instructions, especially the various notability guidelines.

I'd like to help the AFC backlogs, especially with biological nomenclature articles, as I'm more often than not somewhat familiar with and passionate about these fields. X (talk) 14:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC) X (talk) 14:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Staraction

Staraction (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

I want to be able to help with the AfC backlog! I've been working with creating new articles through AfC for a while now, so I have a good idea of the requirements, especially WP:NOTABILITY (which I've learned through experience). I believe I meet the minimum requirements and would like to help more. Thanks for considering! Staraction (talk | contribs) 22:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Futuristicediting

Futuristicediting (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

To start a new beginning Futuristicediting (talk) 11:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. You were just blocked from moving pages, which will make it impossible to be a reviewer. Additionally, the recent series of rapid, useless edits to your talk page does not give me any confidence. If you continue editing disruptively, you will be blocked sitewide. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:SafariScribe

SafariScribe (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

Hi, I'm requesting the AFC reviewing right after reading more of the reviewing instructions to volunteer in WP:AFC. Furthermore, I have participated actively in AFD, and from my contibs, helped out in certain tasks of the encyclopedia. I have also helped in some draft reviewing, so it's a good way of helping the backlog (since it do rise each time I look at it). Thanks for the consideration.— Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shadow311

Shadow311 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd) (add user)

I would like to help lower the backlog. Shadow311 (talk) 19:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]