|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration subpages|
|Archive of prior proceedings|
Comments in My Section
Two editors in good faith added comments in my section in which I endorsed formal mediation for the No Gun Ri massacre request. Since threaded comments are not permitted in Arb requests, will a clerk please move their comments? Robert McClenon (talk) 21:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- It appears that L235 took care of this request on Tuesday. Just wanted to note that this question was addressed. Liz Read! Talk! 20:05, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
The evidence page for this case is already extremely large due to all the preliminary comments that have been copied there. Most however are comments relating to whether or not Malik's desysop was level 1, level 2 or neither, and whether it should be reversed. They are procedural comments, not substantive evidence about behaviour in the P-I topic area. I'm not sure it makes sense to copy every comment to that section, might I suggest that this practice be modified so that:
- (first preference) It is left to users to decide whether or not they want to base their evidence on their preliminary comments before the case was opened; or
- (second preference) The clerk opening the case actually considers the substance of the preliminary comments and whether they contain evidence that should be copied to that page (likely to be unduly onerous for the clerks).