Wikipedia talk:Article wizard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
WikiProject Articles for creation (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject icon This page is used for the administration of the Articles for Creation or Files for Upload processes and is therefore within the scope of WikiProject Articles for Creation. Please direct any queries to the discussion page. WikiProject icon
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the quality scale.
 

Untitled[edit]

The 'conflict of interest' rule makes no sense in my case. Also it can easily be cheated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wouter Drucker (talkcontribs) 19:01, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 19 January 2015[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Template talk:AFC submission/declined#Template-protected edit request on 19 January 2015. Thought I should post about it here in case anyone watches this page and not that one (since the sibling templates’ Talks redirect here). —174.141.182.82 (talk) 11:15, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 10 February 2015[edit]

8.37.228.90 (talk) 19:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. -- John of Reading (talk) 20:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Create a separate "failure" page for notability from sources[edit]

Hi, I've noticed that if you state that your topic may not be notable, you are linked to this page with a large button in the middle stating "create new userspace draft". I think that the article wizard should not be encouraging new users to create articles that are not notable - the article was just get deleted/draft will get declined if submitted as a draft. Frankly, it's quite cruel to suggest creating a page about a topic that may not be notable, because the user may spend several months fruitlessly working on their draft about a non-notable person which has no chance of getting accepted anyway. This only drives them away from Wikipedia, while clogging the AFC workload with non-notable subjects, a lose-lose situation in the end. In fact, although I started this message with the idea of differentiating the failure pages for sources and notability, without sources a draft will have no chance of getting accepted as well. I think it would be a better idea to encourage new users to write about another topic, or edit a couple of existing articles instead. If people agree with this I can draft up a different failure page for both sources and notability. Thanks! Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 14:12, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

I support this, as we have a ton of people come into the IRC channel where we tell them their declined article will never be accepted. Cutting them off before they start seems like a good way to prevent people from wasting their time. Primefac (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Per this discussion, and my own opinion, I've BOLDly removed the "Create a userspace draft section". — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 16:04, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 April 2015[edit]

Mohd Saquib is a entrepreneur. 14.98.41.227 (talk) 03:46, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page Wikipedia:Article wizard. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. Stickee (talk) 05:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello! I want to crate an new article relative with constitutional ceremonial monarchy. Can you help me please?176.92.231.100 (talk) 12:32, 3 June 2015 (UTC)