Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia talk:Editor retention)
Jump to: navigation, search
  Main page   Editor of the Week   Members   Templates   Talk page  
WikiProject Editor Retention
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Editor Retention, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of efforts to improve editor retention on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 

Previous conversations about newbies, all in one place, so we can harvest ideas for solutions and not re-hash them[edit]

An un-opened gift from User:Penyulap

This is a library of sorts. Open 24/7. No library card is required and no fines will be levied.

Back on July 1, 2012, Dennis Brown said: "I'm seeing a lot of discussion in a lot of place regarding editor retention, but not a coordinated effort. This is that coordinated effort, a way for us to actually do something beside speak out in random venues."

Women in Red November contest open to all[edit]


Women in Red logo.svg
Announcing Women in Red's November 2017 prize-winning world contest
Robinson projection SW.jpg

Contest details: create biographical articles for women of any country or occupation in the world: November 2017 WiR Contest

Read more about how Women in Red is overcoming the gender gap: WikiProject Women in Red

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 15:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

OUTCOMES as a means to prevent editor frustration at AfD/MfD[edit]

Hi. I've been burned at AfD plenty of times and I think unintended results hurt editor retention. (No one wants "their article" deleted. Some people favor specific types of articles.) I think that OUTCOMES can help prevent needless head-on collisions between editors. I want to craft a nutshell for that essay so we can share a common understanding and stop the headaches and editor alienation. Please chime in at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes#Second effort for a nutshell. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:52, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

It's not so much 'their' articles, as the needless sprees of serial listing at AfD of absolutely non toxic articles for which a clear precedent has been established. Some articles are listed at AfD by relatively clueless newbies who think it's cool to join Wikipedia and start patrolling new articles without any experience. Some are listed by established editors with a vengeance for some kinds of articles they just don't like. Either way, the people who get hurt are new users who have created non toxic articles in good faith. That's what has to stop. Many people still fail to realise (or pretend not to) that Outcomes is neither a policy, a guideline, nor an essay. It's just a factual report on how some types of harmless articles have traditionally been handled - sometimes in their 1,000s. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)