Wikipedia talk:Featured topic candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Featured content dispatch workshop 

Oct 1: Let's get serious about plagiarism


Jul 10: Infoboxes: time for a fresh look?


Nov 15: A guide to the Good Article Review Process
Oct 18: Common issues seen in Peer review
Oct 11: Editing tools, part 3
Sep 20: Editing tools, part 2
Sep 6: Editing tools, part 1
Mar 15: GA Sweeps end
Feb 8: Content reviewers and standards


Nov 2: Inner German border
Oct 12: Sounds
May 11: WP Birds
May 4: Featured lists
Apr 20: Valued pictures
Apr 13: Plagiarism
Apr 6: New FAC/FAR nominations
Mar 16: New FAC/FAR delegates
Mar 9: 100 Featured sounds
Mar 2: WP Ships FT and GT
Feb 23: 100 FS approaches
Feb 16: How busy was 2008?
Feb 8: April Fools 2009
Jan 31: In the News
Jan 24: Reviewing featured picture candidates
Jan 17: FA writers—the 2008 leaders
Jan 10: December themed page
Jan 3: Featured list writers


Nov 24: Featured article writers
Nov 10: Historic election on Main Page
Nov 8: Halloween Main Page contest
Oct 13: Latest on featured articles
Oct 6: Matthewedwards interview
Sep 22: Reviewing non-free images
Sep 15: Interview with Ruhrfisch
Sep 8: Style guide and policy changes, August
Sep 1: Featured topics
Aug 25: Interview with Mav
Aug 18: Choosing Today's Featured Article
Aug 11: Reviewing free images
Aug 9 (late): Style guide and policy changes, July
Jul 28: Find reliable sources online
Jul 21: History of the FA process
Jul 14: Rick Block interview
Jul 7: Style guide and policy changes for June
Jun 30: Sources in biology and medicine
Jun 23 (26): Reliable sources
Jun 16 (23): Assessment scale
Jun 9: Main page day
Jun 2: Styleguide and policy changes, April and May
May 26: Featured sounds
May 19: Good article milestone
May 12: Changes at Featured lists
May 9 (late): FC from schools and universities
May 2 (late): Did You Know
Apr 21: Styleguide and policy changes
Apr 14: FA milestone
Apr 7: Reviewers achieving excellence
Mar 31: Featured content overview
Mar 24: Taming talk page clutter
Mar 17: Changes at peer review
Mar 13 (late): Vintage image restoration
Mar 3: April Fools mainpage
Feb 25: Snapshot of FA categories
Feb 18: FA promotion despite adversity
Feb 11: Great saves at FAR
Feb 4: New methods to find FACs
Jan 28: Banner year for Featured articles

Better definition for rules[edit]

I think that the following criterion could be defined more clearly:

The featured topic director, GamerPro64, or his delegate Juhachi, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. For a nomination to be promoted to FT or GT status, consensus must be reached for a group to be promoted to featured or good topic status.

I am going to recommend that we follow the WP:FPC guidelines of:

For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-third majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets.

Rephrased for our project:

For promotion, if a topic is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be promoted. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-third majority in support, including the nominator(s) of the topic; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets.

Thoughts? Kees08(Talk) 19:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

  • A hard ten day limit is going to be very problematic here, given how long it can take to draw attention to even the most well-qualified of topics. I'd suggest a month, as that seems to be how long a normal nomination takes around here. Courcelles (talk) 21:04, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Yeah, 30 days seems more appropriate. Kees08 (Talk) 19:21, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination needs closing[edit]

Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Type 1934-class destroyers/archive1 was promoted but the nomination is still open. Brad (talk) 00:43, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

GamerPro64 closed it last January...-- 01:08, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Unlike FAC or FLC, FTC doesn't have a bot come by and put closing templates on the nomination page. When the coordinator says that the nomination is closed and adds the topic to WP:GT/FT, that's it. --PresN 01:17, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Article alerts shows the nomination as still open so something isn't right. Brad (talk) 13:23, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

There was still a template up saying it was still nominated. I removed the template. GamerPro64 16:01, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Month-old addition page still open[edit]

This nomination for three additions to the Marvel Cinematic Universe films good topic has been open since April 8 and currently has six votes of support (and in the interest of transparency, one is from me). I wanted to request a user to review this addition and close it as either added or not, as I personally think it has remained open longer than necessary. Sock (tock talk) 17:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Ancient FTC[edit]

Greetings, shouldn't Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Naruto characters/archive1 be closed? It's almost a year old with no comments and two standing opposes. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:36, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

It says its been closed. GamerPro64 20:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

2 Topics listed as good topics, say they are featured[edit]

@GamerPro64 and Juhachi:

Quick question: there are two topics that are listed on the good topics page, but not the featured topic page, that both claim (on their talk pages) that they are currently featured topics. They are Wikipedia:Featured topics/Battlecruisers of Russia and Wikipedia:Featured topics/1st Army Group (Kingdom of Yugoslavia). Which are these? And, if they are only good topics, how can I nominate them for featured status? The only thing that's changed since they were promoted to good topics is that they now meet the requirements for featured topics.

Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Good topics become featured topics automatically if at least 50% of the articles in the topic become featured, so there is no renomination process. I moved the two topics to the featured topic page.-- 00:28, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
@Juhachi: Thanks! Also, I created a section in my sandbox (User:DannyS712/sandbox#Promote topics) that lists every topic that only needs 1 more article to bec featured to become a featured topic. If this is useful feel free to copy/edit it. --DannyS712 (talk) 00:35, 30 November 2018 (UTC)