Talk:Hoxne Hoard

Hoxne Hoard is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 16, 2010.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 27, 2010	Featured article candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 3, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Hoxne Hoard, the largest hoard of Roman silver and gold discovered in Great Britain, includes pepper pots, silverware and a body chain?

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 16, 2012, November 16, 2016, November 16, 2017, and November 16, 2022.

The Hoxne Challenge
How quickly can Wikipedians produce a top quality article if given access to the world's best resources?

This article was the focus of a major rewriting project. A joint workshop with curators held on 25 June 2010 resulted in significant improvement and recommendations. See here for more details.

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Museum High‑importance

	This article relates to the British Museum. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one, as needed.British MuseumWikipedia:GLAM/British MuseumTemplate:WikiProject British MuseumBritish Museum-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Anglia: Suffolk Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Suffolk task force.

Archives

1, 2

/sources—new sources pending area

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

}}

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hoxne Hoard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111024051925/http://finds.org.uk/blogs/fromehoard/ to http://finds.org.uk/blogs/fromehoard/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hoxne Hoard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive newspapers[edit]

It says

Newspapers lost interest in the hoard quickly, allowing British Museum curators to sort, clean, and stabilise it without further disruption from the press.

And it's sourced to Bland & Johns 1993b pp. 153-157. My questions are:

How can newpapers "disrupt" the sorting, cleaning, and stabilization of archeological finds? What, precisely, could The Times or any other paper done to prevent curators from sorting and cleaning the items of this find? Would they have kidnapped key personnel, or excited the public to storm or block the museum buildings, or what?
Do Bland & Johns really say this claim, or is that a misinterpretion of the source?
If Bland & Johns really do say this, what other ridiculous things do they say, and how good a source are they? Herostratus (talk) 12:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously they are much the best source. If you'd met Johns you'd have less difficulty believing this was said. The Staffordshire Hoard, in which the press lost interest a good deal more slowly, is probably the best example for the opposite. If nothing else, the work of curators was "disrupted" for some time by the perceived need for media appearances. Johnbod (talk) 14:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I would have assumed that any "disruption" in cases like this is simply newspapers wanting to photograph the finders with their discovery. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:04, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, can't the curators just say "No you can't come in here"? How much would this really interrupt the work. It's a bit of calumny on Fleet Street and certainly makes the curators look feckless. Herostratus (talk) 21:19, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure they probably can say "No you can't come in here". The disruption is that they have to wait until the newspapers have finished taking their "we-are-real-life-Detectorists-jackpot-winners" glamour shots before they can even begin their time-sensitive conservation work. But that's just my guess. We'd have to ask one of them, I guess. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:42, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]