Wikipedia talk:Good articles

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Semi-protected edit request on 5 January 2016[edit]

Ladycools (talk) 23:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. DatbubblegumdoeIt's2016? 23:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Add an Anatomy section?[edit]

I notice the Biology section has a lot of articles like Brain, Cervix, Pudendal nerve, etc. Would it make sense to add an anatomy section just for these? (It could be human and nonhuman anatomy). I would be happy to do the split. delldot ∇. 21:06, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

@Prhartcom:, @Animalparty:, @FunkMonk:, you all weighed in on the Animal taxa split earlier, any thoughts on this idea? delldot ∇. 16:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 January 2016[edit]

Change married to Tyler Diebel. 66.87.144.111 (talk) 15:18, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm not exactly sure what you mean; this is just a list of articles so there's no real content to change. Is there an article in particular you're asking about? GRAPPLE X 15:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page Wikipedia:Good articles. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. --Majora (talk) 15:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

United States[edit]

I am not sure how this passed a GA review considering the disputes ongoing and grossly over sized article with dead links and dated statements. Do other think this should be reviewed? Talk:United States/GA2 is so small considering all the problems.-- Moxy (talk) 14:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

I'd recommend leaving a note on the talk page outlining what you think needs fixed, then take to WP:GAR if they don't get addressed in a reasonable time. delldot ∇. 04:10, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Flame & Citron[edit]

The article Flame & Citron passed the GA review on January 19, 2016 ([1]) but until know the bot didn't add the GA icon. Is it a problem if I add on my own? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 21:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Not at all, I have noticed this problem too. I have done this with many articles I have promoted or others that have been passed. Burklemore1 (talk) 04:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Image size discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images[edit]

Opinions are needed on the following matter: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images#Fixing images below the default size. A WP:Permalink for it is here. The discussion concerns whether or not we should keep the following wording: "As a general rule, images should not be set to a larger fixed size than the 220px default (users can adjust this in their preferences). If an exception to the general rule is warranted, forcing an image size to be either larger or smaller than the 220px default is done by placing a parameter in the image coding." The latest aspect of the discussion is the 1.4 Amended proposal (2A) subsection. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

This discussion has progressed to a WP:RfC: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images#RfC: Should the guideline maintain the "As a general rule" wording or something similar?. A WP:Permalink is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:45, 25 January 2016 (UTC)