Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion
|In February 2011, it was proposed that this page be moved from Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion to . The result of the debate was not moved. (See discussion.)|
|In May 2016, it was proposed that this page be moved from Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion to . The result of the debate was no consensus (not moved). (See discussion.)|
Why are there so many new listings by one user?
I am an unregistered user and am posting here to complete Stage I of the MfD process, as per Wiki instructions.
Reasons for nomination: the page in question is a copy of an already-deleted Wikipage (which the same user also created), which was deleted due to contraventions of WP:BLP.
The woman concerned has a paramount right to privacy, which is contravened by this article. Since 1998, she and several of her colleagues have been hounded by certain media outlets, including WikiPedia and the page creation and editing of the User:Mmyotis.
The woman has the right to remain incognito and not to be subject to this harassment. She is not a 'missing' person.
I now ask a registered editor to continue the MfD process with Stages II and III. (I am unable to do so, as unregistered editors do not have such permissions).
- Done. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mmyotis/Amalia Marquez. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Mfdx
Template:Mfdx has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pppery (talk) 14:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Requested move crosspost
I am posting here to notify you of a requested move I made regarding a bunch of deletion discussion templates. The discussion is at Template_talk:Cfd-notify#Requested move 21 August 2016 Pppery (talk) 23:28, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
I tried to nominate Talk:New World Order (conspiracy theory)/13 Secret Families for deletion... I thought I was following the directions... but something keeps screwing up... tried to fix it myself, but I ended up making it worse (I even ended up nominating my nomination page for deletion - see: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:New World Order (conspiracy theory)/13 Secret Families). Not sure what I am doing wrong. Can someone help?
My rational for the actual nomination is as follows: "Talk sub-page is one huge WP:SYNTH vio... the page creator has a unique (original) take on the "13 families" (a sub-theory within the broader NWO theory). He created the sub-page to lay out the "evidence" supporting his original theory. While he does cite sources... he does so as "evidence", not verification. The problem is that the editor is the one making all the connections, and reaching conclusions... not the sources he cites as evidence."